Leptin Increases Blood Pressure and Markers of Endothelial Activation during Pregnancy in Rats

Ibrahim, Hisham Saleh; Omar, Effat; Froemming, Gabrielle Ruth Anisah; Singh, Harbindar Jeet

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/298401

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 | Article ID 298401 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/298401

Leptin Increases Blood Pressure and Markers of Endothelial Activation during Pregnancy in Rats

Hisham Saleh Ibrahim,¹Effat Omar,¹Gabrielle Ruth Anisah Froemming,¹and Harbindar Jeet Singh¹

Academic Editor: Rei Shibata

Received10 Apr 2013

Revised13 Aug 2013

Accepted23 Aug 2013

Published19 Sept 2013

Abstract

Raised leptin levels have been reported in the placentae and serum of women with elevated blood pressure and proteinuria during pregnancy. The role of leptin in this however remains unknown. This study investigates the effect of leptin administration on systolic blood pressure (SBP) and proteinuria and serum markers of endothelial activation during pregnancy in Sprague Dawley rats. From day 1 of pregnancy, 24 rats were randomised into those given either saline (group 1) or leptin at 60 or 120 μg/kg/body weight/day (groups 2 and 3 resp.). SBP was measured every 5 days and 24-h urinary protein was measured at days 0 and 20 of pregnancy. Animals were euthanised on day 20 of pregnancy, and serum was collected for estimation of E-selectin and ICAM-1. Compared to group 1, SBP during the latter part of the pregnancy was significantly higher in the leptin-treated group (). Urinary protein excretion, serum E-selectin, and ICAM-1 were significantly higher in leptin-treated rats (). It seems that leptin administration to normotensive Sprague Dawley rats during pregnancy significantly increases SBP, urinary protein excretion, and markers of endothelial activation. However, further studies are required to examine the underlying mechanism responsible for this and its relevance to preeclampsia in humans.

1. Introduction

Leptin, a 16 kDa protein, is primarily secreted from white adipose tissue and plays an important role in controlling food intake and energy balance [1, 2]. Exogenous leptin treatment decreases adiposity by decreasing food intake and increasing energy utilization [3–5]. In addition to suppressing appetite, leptin also promotes weight loss in rodents via sympathetic activation of brown adipose tissue and oxidation of fatty acids [6]. Sympatho-activation following either intra-cerebroventricular or chronic intravenous leptin administration has been shown to increase mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate in rodents [7–9]. Arterial blood pressure in leptin-deficient ob/ob mice is lower than in wild-type littermates and is substantially increased with exogenous leptin administration [10]. Agouti mice, which are obese and hyperleptinemic, and transgenic skinny hepatic leptin over-expressing mice have elevated blood pressure [10]. Taken together, these observations demonstrate in several different rodent models that leptin influences blood pressure and that hyperleptinemia in obesity might contribute to the hypertension.

Studies on nonpregnant obese individuals also indicate that adipose tissue expresses high levels of proinflammatory cytokines [11, 12], and the proinflammatory state of obesity has been implicated in pre-eclampsia [13]. Maternal obesity in pregnancy is associated with increases in serum leptin, MCP-1, and hsCRP [14]. Increased leptin concentrations have been found to correlate with increased concentration of inflammatory markers in morbidly obese individuals [15]. Elevated serum leptin levels have been reported in women with preeclampsia [16]. Leptin concentrations have also been found to be higher in the placentae of preeclamptic women [17]. In addition to raised serum leptin level, generalised endothelial dysfunction is evidently also present in women with pre-eclampsia [18, 19]. The cause for this widespread endothelial dysfunction is unknown, although numerous placental factors have been proposed. As the prevalence of pre-eclampsia is higher in obese women and elevated serum leptin concentrations therefore precede pre-eclampsia [16], we wondered if the raised serum leptin concentration contributed to the hypertension, proteinuria, and endothelial dysfunction that are commonly seen in women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. This study therefore examined the effects of exogenous leptin administration during pregnancy on blood pressure, urinary protein excretion, markers of endothelial activation, and food and water intake in non-obese normotensive Sprague Dawley rats.

2. Methods

Female Sprague Dawley rats, aged 12-13 weeks, were housed in polyethylene cages at room temperature (22–24°C), with a 12/12 hours light/dark cycle (7am–7pm), and with access ad libitum to food and water throughout the observation period. All animals were screened for raising blood pressure and proteinuria before the start of the study. Animals with systolic blood pressure (SBP) of ≥140 mm Hg and/or positive for proteinuria of (+) on the dipstick test were excluded from the study. After confirmation of proestrous following a vaginal smear, each female was housed overnight with a fertile male. Mating was confirmed through a positive sperm smear the following morning. This was marked as pregnancy day 1. Following confirmation of mating, the females were randomised into 3 groups, with a total of 8 rats per group (Table 1). Group 1 (NSP) was given 0.1 mL saline subcutaneously from day 1 of pregnancy; group 2 (LD1-60) was given 60 μg/kg/day of leptin subcutaneously from day 1 of pregnancy, and group 3 (LD1-120) was given 120 μg/kg/day of leptin subcutaneously from the day 1 of pregnancy. The dose of leptin used was based on our previous study in the male rat where 30 μg/kg/day was found to significantly affect sperm count and morphology without significantly affecting food or water intake [20]. The initial starting dose was doubled to 60 μg/kg/day in this study in view of the slight leptin resistance that is usually present during pregnancy. The dose of leptin was adjusted according to the change in body weight as the pregnancy progressed.

Body weight and food and water intake were recorded every 7 days, while 24-hour urine specimen for measurement of protein excretion was collected on days 0 and 20 of pregnancy. SBP was measured every 5 days during pregnancy using tail-cuff plethysmography (CODA, USA). All animals were decapitated using a small animal guillotine on day 20 of pregnancy, and blood samples were then collected for the analysis of ICAM-1 and E-selectin. Serum ICAM-1 was measured using a commercially available kit (Abnova, USA) as described in a previous study [21]. The serum E-selection was measured using a commercially available kit (IBL JAPAN) after Vadasz et al. [22]. Urinary protein excretion was estimated spectrophotometrically (Roche, Germany). The study design was approved by the Animal Users and Care Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc analysis. A was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

No significant differences were seen in water intake and body weight between the groups (Tables 1 and 2). Water intake on day 0 however was slightly lower in LD1-60 and LD1-120 when compared to that in NSP on day 0 ().

No significant differences were evident in SBP on day 0 between the 3 groups (Figure 1). Compared to the NSP, SBP was significantly higher on days 15 (LD1-120; ) and 20 (LD1-60 and LD1-120; ) of pregnancy in the two groups receiving leptin (Figure 1). SBP on day 20 was also significantly higher in animals receiving 120 μg of leptin when compared to that in animals receiving 60 μg of leptin (LD1-60 versus LD1-120; ).

No significant differences were evident in 24-h urinary protein excretion on day 0 between the three groups (Figure 2). Urinary protein excretion was significantly higher in leptin treated groups at day 20 of pregnancy when compared to that in NSP group (). No significant difference was present in 24 h urinary protein excretion between LD1-60 and LD1-120.

Serum ICAM-1 concentrations on day 20 of pregnancy were significantly higher in the groups receiving leptin when compared to the NSP group (; Figure 3).

Serum E-selectin concentrations on day 20 of pregnancy were significantly higher in the groups receiving 60 and 120 g/kg/day of leptin when compared to the NSP group ( and resp.; Figure 4).

4. Discussion

The major significant findings of this study are as follows: (a) raised blood pressure during the latter part of pregnancy, (b) raised urinary protein excretion, and (c) significantly higher levels ICAM-1 and E-selectin in the serum following leptin administration during pregnancy. The precise mechanism responsible for these remains unclear. Body weight was not significantly different between the three groups either on day 0 or day 20 (Table 1). Although water intake was lower at day 0 in leptin-treated groups, there was however no significant difference in water intake between the groups on day 20 of pregnancy (Table 2). The reason for the lower water intake on day 0 might be related to incomplete or poor acclimatisation to the metabolic cages by some of the animals, as measurements were made after just 24 hours of acclimatisation. It is however unlikely that the differences in water intake at day 0 would have in any way contributed to the differences in blood pressure, proteinuria, or the markers of endothelial activation between leptin treated rats and the controls.

Increases in blood pressure following leptin administration in nonpregnant rats have been reported before [7, 23], but no reports exist of this during pregnancy. This is the first of its kind examining the effect of leptin on blood pressure and proteinuria during pregnancy. Although the mechanism responsible for the rise in blood pressure following leptin treatment was not examined in this study, increases in blood pressure following leptin administration have been attributed to increases in sympathetic activity [24, 25], increased vasomotor activity and endothelial activation [26, 27], and/or alteration in renal salt and water handling [28]. It is possible that either one of these or all of them might be involved in the raised blood pressure following leptin treatment during pregnancy (Figure 1). It was also interesting to note that increases in blood pressure following leptin treatment only became evident during the second half of the pregnancy, that is, sometime between days 10 and 15. The precise reason for this “time lag” is unclear as in our other current studies involving nonpregnant rats, blood pressure increases become evident from as early as day 7 following daily leptin treatments (unpublished data). Serum leptin levels or the time course changes in serum leptin levels were not measured in this study as we did not expect to see any significant differences in serum leptin levels between the three groups. Our previous study in the male rats did not show any significant differences in serum leptin levels between control rats and those given 30 μg/kg/day of leptin for 42 days [20]. As leptin was injected as a single daily dose, and given its short half-life, it is unlikely that any significant differences in serum leptin levels would have persisted long enough to become evident between the groups, particularly when the blood was collected 24 hours after the last leptin injection. Moreover the change in body weight over the course of pregnancy was not different between the controls and leptin treated rats. Serum leptin levels however generally increase during pregnancy due to the increase in adipose tissue and we expect a somewhat similar increase in serum leptin in all the groups. Leptin injections would have just caused a transient increase in serum leptin levels, which was probably responsible for the noticeable differences in some of the measured parameters between the groups. SBP did not increase in nonleptin treated rats, suggesting that the increases in serum leptin concentrations during pregnancy do not significantly alter blood pressure. This might be due to concurrent vasodilatory effects of progesterone, as its levels increase during pregnancy. The increasing levels of progesterone during the early part of pregnancy could also explain the “time lag” between the start of leptin treatment and the increase in blood pressure. Interestingly, the effect of leptin on food intake was absent, as evident from similar increases in body weight in control and leptin treated rats, despite the raised serum leptin levels during pregnancy and this is believed to be due to concurrent leptin resistance that develops during pregnancy.

While the exact link between raised blood pressure and markers of endothelial activation is not evident from this study, the finding of elevated levels of ICAM-1 and E-selectin (Figures 3 and 4) might suggest a concurrent leptin-induced alteration in the release of vasoactive substances, like ET-1, which might be responsible for the raised blood pressure. Raised serum levels of E-selectin have been reported in cases of essential hypertension but the mechanism of the link between the raised blood pressure and increased levels of E-selectin remains unclear [29]. There are however no data available in the literature on the impact of leptin on markers of endothelial activation during pregnancy, despite the proposed link between adiposity and endothelial dysfunction [30–32]. A recent study in vitro however reported that leptin increased ICAM-1 production by HUVEC in a dose-dependent manner via the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway [33] and a similar mechanism might also be responsible for the increases in ICAM-1 and E-selectin levels in this study. Some previous studies in nonpregnant animals have also linked leptin to induction of endothelial dysfunction secondary to oxidative stress [34], decreases in paraoxonase activity, platelet aggregation, migration, hypertrophy, and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells [35]. Measurement of vasoactive factors of endothelial origin like ET-1, ACE I, or eNOS activity could provide a clearer picture of the actions of leptin besides its action on the markers of endothelial activation.

The precise mechanism responsible for the increased urinary protein excretion in leptin treated rats in this study is unclear (Figure 2). Little exists in the literature on the effect of leptin on renal protein handling. It is however known that leptin is mainly excreted by the kidney, and that rat and mouse kidneys show abundant Ob-R transcripts, indicating an interaction of leptin with special renal receptors [36, 37]. Long-term infusion of leptin in obese, diabetic db/db mouse however, has been found to induce glomerular expression and accumulation of type IV collagen [38]. Raised deposition of collagen and lesion to endothelial cells might lead to proteinuria [39]. Renal disease has been associated with obese individuals, and increased TGF-β and glomerulosclerosis have been reported in patients with high circulating leptin levels [39, 40]. Besides, TGF-β is also known to promote renal fibrosis through stimulation of extracellular matrix proteins [41]. These could be responsible for the raised protein excretion in leptin treated rats. Clearly, microscopic examination of the kidney could help provide some clues to the possible mechanism of leptin induced proteinuria.

From the results of this study it seems that leptin administration to normotensive Sprague Dawley rats during pregnancy significantly increases systemic blood pressure and markers of endothelial activation. In addition, it also increases urinary protein excretion. There is therefore a possibility that raised leptin levels might contribute to some of the symptoms of pre-eclampsia. However, further studies including the measurement of vasoactive substances and renal histopathology with TGF expression are required to examine the underlying mechanism of the raised BP and increased protein excretion following leptin treatment. The findings of this study nevertheless do point to a potential role for leptin in pregnancy-induced hypertensive disorders.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Grant no. 600-RMI/DANA 5/3/RIF (493/2012) from the Research Management Institute (RMI)—UiTM, Malaysia. We would also like to thank the staff of the IMMB, Faculty of Medicine, UiTM for their excellent technical support.

References

P. J. Scarpace and M. Matheny, “Leptin induction of UCP1 gene expression is dependent on sympathetic innervation,” American Journal of Physiology—Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 275, no. 2, pp. E259–E264, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
J. E. Schneider, R. M. Blum, and G. N. Wade, “Metabolic control of food intake and estrous cycles in Syrian hamsters. I. Plasma insulin and leptin,” American Journal of Physiology—Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology, vol. 278, no. 2, pp. R476–R485, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Abelenda, A. Ledesma, E. Rial, and M. Puerta, “Leptin administration to cold-acclimated rats reduces both food intake and brown adipose tissue thermogenesis,” Journal of Thermal Biology, vol. 28, no. 6-7, pp. 525–530, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Pelleymounter, M. J. Cullen, M. B. Baker et al., “Effects of the obese gene product on body weight regulation in ob/ob mice,” Science, vol. 269, no. 5223, pp. 540–543, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
P. J. Scarpace, M. Matheny, B. H. Pollock, and N. Tümer, “Leptin increases uncoupling protein expression and energy expenditure,” American Journal of Physiology—Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 273, no. 1, pp. E226–E230, 1997.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Collins, C. M. Kuhn, A. E. Petro, A. G. Swick, B. A. Chrunyk, and R. S. Surwit, “Role of leptin in fat regulation,” Nature, vol. 380, no. 6576, p. 677, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Rahmouni and W. G. Haynes, “Leptin and the cardiovascular system,” Recent Progress in Hormone Research, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 225–244, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. P. Nasrallah and F. N. Ziyadeh, “Overview of the physiology and pathophysiology of leptin with special emphasis on its role in the kidney,” in Seminars in Nephrology, Elsevier, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Schinzari, M. Tesauro, V. Rovella et al., “Leptin stimulates both endothelin-1 and nitric oxide activity in lean subjects but not in patients with obesity-related metabolic syndrome,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 1235–1241, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Aizawa-Abe, Y. Ogawa, H. Masuzaki et al., “Pathophysiological role of leptin in obesity-related hypertension,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 105, no. 9, pp. 1243–1252, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
A. S. Greenberg and M. S. Obin, “Obesity and the role of adipose tissue in inflammation and metabolism,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 461S–465S, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Mehta and J. A. Farmer, “Obesity and inflammation: a new look at an old problem,” Current Atherosclerosis Reports, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 134–138, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Wolf, E. Kettyle, L. Sandler, J. L. Ecker, J. Roberts, and R. Thadhani, “Obesity and preeclampsia: the potential role of inflammation,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 98, no. 5, pp. 757–762, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Madan, J. M. Davis, W. Y. Craig et al., “Maternal obesity and markers of inflammation in pregnancy,” Cytokine, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 61–64, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. M. H. Van Dielen, C. Van't Veer, A. M. Schols, P. B. Soeters, W. A. Buurman, and J. W. M. Greve, “Increased leptin concentrations correlate with increased concentrations of inflammatory markers in morbidly obese individuals,” International Journal of Obesity, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 1759–1766, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Miehle, H. Stepan, and M. Fasshauer, “Leptin, adiponectin and other adipokines in gestational diabetes mellitus and pre-eclampsia,” Clinical Endocrinology, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 2–11, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. J. Singh, A. A. Bakar, A. C. Romli, and A. Nila, “Raised leptin concentrations in feto-placental tissues from women with preeclampsia,” Hypertension in Pregnancy, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 191–199, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Chambers, L. Fusi, I. S. Malik, D. O. Haskard, M. De Swiet, and J. S. Kooner, “Association of maternal endothelial dysfunction with preeclampsia,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 285, no. 12, pp. 1607–1612, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
J. M. Roberts and K. Y. Lain, “Recent insights into the pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia,” Placenta, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 359–372, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. N. Haron, U. J. A. D'Souza, H. Jaafar, R. Zakaria, and H. J. Singh, “Exogenous leptin administration decreases sperm count and increases the fraction of abnormal sperm in adult rats,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 322–324, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Bella, P. R. Kolatkar, C. W. Marlor, J. M. Greve, and M. G. Rossmann, “The structure of the two amino-terminal domains of human ICAM-1 suggests how it functions as a rhinovirus receptor and as an LFA-1 integrin ligand,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 8, pp. 4140–4145, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Vadasz, T. Haj, K. Halasz et al., “Semaphorin 3A is a marker for disease activity and a potential immunoregulator in systemic lupus erythematosus,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 14, no. 3, article R146, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. N. Faria, F. F. Ribeiro Filho, S. R. G. Ferreira, and M. T. Zanella, “Impact of visceral fat on blood pressure and insulin sensitivity in hypertensive obese women,” Obesity Research, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 1203–1206, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
W. G. Haynes, D. A. Morgan, S. A. Walsh, A. L. Mark, and W. I. Sivitz, “Receptor-mediated regional sympathetic nerve activation by leptin,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 270–278, 1997.
View at: Google Scholar
J. C. Dunbar, Y. Hu, and H. Lu, “Intracerebroventricular leptin increases lumbar and renal sympathetic nerve activity and blood pressure in normal rats,” Diabetes, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 2040–2043, 1997.
View at: Google Scholar
M. L. G. Correia and K. Rahmouni, “Role of leptin in the cardiovascular and endocrine complications of metabolic syndrome,” Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 603–610, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Madajka, M. Korda, J. White, and T. Malinski, “Effect of aspirin on constitutive nitric oxide synthase and the biovailability of NO,” Thrombosis Research, vol. 110, no. 5-6, pp. 317–321, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. A. Ecelbarger, “Proteomics and sodium transport,” Proteomics in Nephrology, vol. 141, pp. 124–141, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
R. De Caterina, L. Ghiadoni, S. Taddei et al., “Soluble E-selectin in essential hypertension: a correlate of vascular structural changes,” American Journal of Hypertension, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 259–266, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. S. Yudkin, C. D. A. Stehouwer, J. J. Emeis, and S. W. Coppack, “C-reactive protein in healthy subjects: associations with obesity, insulin resistance, and endothelial dysfunction: a potential role for cytokines originating from adipose tissue?” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 972–978, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
H. O. Steinberg, H. Chaker, R. Leaming, A. Johnson, G. Brechtel, and A. D. Baron, “Obesity/insulin resistance is associated with endothelial dysfunction: implications for the syndrome of insulin resistance,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 97, no. 11, pp. 2601–2610, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Hashimoto, M. Akishita, M. Eto et al., “The impairment of flow-mediated vasodilatation in obese men with visceral fat accumulation,” International Journal of Obesity, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 477–484, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
J. J. Cha, Y. Y. Hyun, Y. H. Jee et al., “Plasma concentration of soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1) is elevated in type 2 diabetic patients, and sICAM-1 synthesis is associated with leptin-induced activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway,” Inflammation, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 878–887, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Hou and J. D. Luo, “Leptin and cardiovascular diseases,” Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 905–913, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Beltowski, “Leptin and atherosclerosis,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 189, no. 1, pp. 47–60, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Y. Wang, Y. T. Zhou, C. B. Newgard, and R. H. Unger, “A novel leptin receptor isoform in rat,” FEBS Letters, vol. 392, no. 2, pp. 87–90, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Serradeil-Le Gal, D. Raufaste, G. Brossard et al., “Characterization and localization of leptin receptors in the rat kidney,” FEBS Letters, vol. 404, no. 2-3, pp. 185–191, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. C. H. Dong Cheol Han, M. Isono, S. Chen et al., “Leptin stimulates type I collagen production in db/db mesangial cells: glucose uptake and TGF-β type II receptor expression,” Kidney International, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 1315–1323, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Wolf, A. Hamann, D. C. Han et al., “Leptin stimulates proliferation and TGF-β expression in renal glomerular endothelial cells: potential role in glomerulosclerosis,” Kidney International, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 860–872, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. L. Kasiske and J. T. Crosson, “Renal disease in patients with massive obesity,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 146, no. 6, pp. 1105–1109, 1986.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Sharma and F. N. Ziyadeh, “The emerging role of transforming growth factor-β in kidney diseases,” American Journal of Physiology—Renal Fluid and Electrolyte Physiology, vol. 266, no. 6, pp. F829–F842, 1994.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2013 Hisham Saleh Ibrahim et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1669

Downloads

1232

Citations