Evidence for the Treatment of Osteoporosis with Vitamin D in Residential Care and in the Community Dwelling Elderly
Table 6
Effect of vitamin D on bone turnover markers.
Sample size
Time
Regimen
25(OH)D (nmol/)
PTH (pmol/L)
ALP (U/L)
Baseline
Followup
Baseline
Followup
Baseline
Followup
Chapuy
142
18 months
CaD P
*
*
Decalyos II
583
2 years
CaD fixed CaD split P
NR
NA NA NA
NA NA NA
RECORD
60
1 year
CaD D P
Combined
Combined
NA NA NA
NA NA NA
Zhu
302
1 year
CaD Ca
+34%* NA
% %
NA NA
NA NA
Kyphos sub-study
120
5 years
CaD Ca P
NA NA NA
NA NA
Heikinheimo residential
33
Final treatment + 1 year
D P
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA
NR NR
NR NR
Heikinheimo community
29
Final treatment + 1 year
D P
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA
NR NR
NR NR
Lips
96
3 years
D P
NA NA
54 (43–61)# 23 (17–28)
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA
Ooms
270
1 year
D P
27 (19–36) 26 (19–37)
62 (52–70)# 23 (17–31)
3.3 (2.4–4.6) 3.5 (2.7–5.0)
3.1 (2.3–4.1)‡ 3.7 (2.5–5.8)
63 (53–78) 66 (55–78)
62 (53–74) 66 (54–76)
Meyer
70
1 year
D P
#
NA NA
NA NA
Lyons
102
At least 5 doses
D P
NA NA
54.0
NA NA
6.65
NA NA
NA NA
Smith
43
4/12
D P
Combined
+21% NA
4.8 (3.9–5.6)
−17% NA
NA NA
NA NA
Ca: calcium; D: vitamin D; P: placebo; NA: not available; NR: not recorded; : decreased; : increased. Plus-minus values: means ± SD. Values followed parentheses: median (interquartile range). Results nonsignificant unless indicated. To convert to ng/mL divide by 2.5. * compared to baseline. compared to baseline. # compared to placebo. ‡ compared to placebo. Difference between means 10.4 ng/mL (95% CI: 6.6–14.2). Difference between means 1.65 pmol/L (95% CI: 0.54–2.74).