Research Article

Coating with Autologous Plasma Improves Biocompatibility of Mesh Grafts In Vitro: Development Stage of a Surgical Innovation

Table 2

Mesh ranking.

Mesh typeNativePBMCATRPlasma

Dynamesh, FEG Textiltechnik2,22,12,62,7
TFT Motifmesh, Proxy Biomedical2,02,02,32,7
Vitamesh, Proxy Biomedical1,61,41,71,9
Ultrapro hernia system medium (UHSM), ethicon1,41,41,61,6
Mersilene band, Johnson and Johnson1,21,21,41,5
Proceed surgical mesh, ethicon1,21,11,41,5
TVT polypropylene 1,01,11,41,6

For assessing the adherence score after 6 weeks, we evaluated each mesh with tissue of ten different patients. After semiquantitative determination, we conducted the frequency distribution value of the score results for each mesh. (points/10).
Scoring was based on the classification proposed by Melman et al. [10].
None (0 point): no tissue ingrowth.
Fair (1 point): thin bands of fibroblasts and small collagen deposits between mesh filaments.
Good (2 points): moderately thick bands of fibroblasts and collagen deposits between mesh filaments.
Excellent (3 points): nearly all spaces between mesh filaments occupied by fibroblasts, collagen deposits, and capillaries.