Clinical Study

The Usefulness of Impedance Cardiography for Predicting Beneficial Effects of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients with Heart Failure

Table 4

Comparison of analysed parameters in subgroups distinguished by peak VO2 improvement.

Peak VO2 improvement Peak VO2 no improvement

Men, (%)29 (90.6)15 (83.3)0.446
Age (years), mean ± SD55.6 ± 9.058.2 ± 7.70.308
BMI (kg × m−2), mean ± SD28.1 ± 3.529.9 ± 4.10.101
Ischaemic aetiology of HF, (%) 26 (81.3)16 (88.9)0.479
Myocardial infarction, (%)25 (78.1)13 (72.2)0.639
Diabetes, (%)7 (21.9)7 (38.9)0.198
Dyslipidaemia, (%)24 (75.0)15 (83.3)0.495
Hypertension, (%)14 (43.8)12 (66.7)0.120
ACE inhibitor, (%)28 (87.5)18 (100.0)0.118
Angiotensin receptor blocker, (%)4 (12.5)2 (11.1)0.884
Beta-blocker, (%)32 (100.0)32 (100.0)
Loop diuretic, (%)23 (71.9)17 (94.4)0.055
Spironolactone, (%)31 (96.9)16 (89.9)0.254
Aspirin, (%)28 (87.5)15 (83.3)0.684
Statin, (%)29 (90.6)17 (94.4)0.632
NYHA class before CR, mean ± SD2.31 ± 0.472.50 ± 0.510.200
NYHA class after CR, mean ± SD2.00 ± 0.442.17 ± 0.620.273
LVEF before CR (%), mean ± SD30.6 ± 7.428.8 ± 7.90.426
LVEF after CR (%), mean ± SD32.0 ± 7.529.0 ± 7.90.187
LVEF change after CR (%), mean ± SD1.4 ± 3.40.2 ± 1.80.220
6-MWT distance before CR (m), mean ± SD417.9 ± 103.5417.7 ± 107.10.993
6-MWT distance after CR (m), mean ± SD481.5 ± 90.1442.8 ± 110.00.184
6-MWT change after CR (m), mean ± SD63.6 ± 69.833.6 ± 47.30.054
TFC before CR (kOhm−1), mean ± SD28.4 ± 5.525.3 ± 4.00.039
TFC after CR (kOhm−1), mean ± SD25.7 ± 4.125.5 ± 3.40.850
TFC change after CR (kOhm−1), mean ± SD2.7 ± 3.60.2 ± 4.10.012

ACE: angiotensin-converting enzyme, BMI: body mass index, CR: cardiac rehabilitation, LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction, ns: nonsignificant, NYHA: New York Heart Association, peak VO2: peak oxygen consumption, TFC: thoracic fluid content.