MicroRNA Era: The Importance for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Adrenocortical Tumors

Bezerra, João Evangelista; Latronico, Ana Claudia

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/381917

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusions References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 | Article ID 381917 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/381917

MicroRNA Era: The Importance for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Adrenocortical Tumors

João Evangelista Bezerra¹and Ana Claudia Latronico²

Academic Editor: Maricilda Palandi de Mello

Received27 Mar 2014

Accepted27 May 2014

Published23 Jun 2014

Abstract

MicroRNAs play an essential role in posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression. They are evolutionary conserved, small, noncoding, 19–22-nucleotide RNAs, whose abnormalities, such as up- or downregulated expression, have been associated with several neoplasms, including adrenocortical tumors. Expression levels of distinct microRNAs can distinguish benign from malignant adrenal tumors. This current review provides recent data on the miRNAs profile in benign and malignant adrenocortical tumors diagnosed in adult and pediatric patients.

1. Introduction

Adrenocortical tumors are common entities [1]. Autopsy studies estimate a prevalence ranging from 1.4 to 2.9% and reaching up to 9% in elderly patients. Incidental adrenal tumors, when adrenal lesions are found during image tests for other reasons, have been found with increasing frequency [1, 2]. The primary adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC), however, is a rare entity. It has an estimated annual incidence of 0.5 to 2 cases per million people and accounts for 0.02% of all cancers [3, 4]. ACC has a bimodal peak of incidence, the first in children less than 5 years old and the second in adults in their fourth or fifth decade of life. It is more common in women than in men with a ratio of 1.5 : 1 [5]. ACC often causes endocrine disorders. Approximately, 60% of ACCs in adults present as a well-defined hormonal syndrome. Cushing syndrome (45%), mixed Cushing and virilization (25%), and isolated virilization syndrome (10%) are the most frequent presentations [6–9]. In childhood, ACC usually presents as virilization syndrome (84%) and less frequently as isolated Cushing syndrome (6%) [10, 11]. Patients who have nonfunctioning ACC present with signs and symptoms related to tumor growth, such as abdominal pain [6, 8].

Because of the huge difference in prognosis and treatment, an accurate distinction between adrenocortical adenomas (ACA) and ACCs is very important. The differentiation between ACA and ACC is primarily based on macroscopic and microscopic features. Some histological score systems were developed to improve accuracy [12–14]. The Weiss score system is the most widely used [15]. It analyzes nine histological parameters associated with adrenocortical neoplasms that metastasized or recurred locally: three related to structure features of the tumor (confluent necrosis, diffuse architecture, and quantity of clear cell component), three related to cytological features (nuclear atypia, atypical mitosis, and number of mitoses), and three related to tumor invasiveness (vascular invasion, sinusoidal invasion, and invasion of adrenal capsule). This system classifies as ACC any tumor that exhibits at least three of the nine features. Unfortunately, even experienced pathologists sometimes are unable to clearly define an adrenocortical tumor as malignant or benign [16]. Also, an adrenocortical tumor Weiss score of 2 or 3 may have unpredictable behavior. There are reports of adrenocortical tumor with Weiss score 2 that behaves in a malignant manner while many tumors with Weiss score 3 are cured by surgery alone. In addition, the applicability of Weiss criteria in the pediatric population is restricted due to poor correlation between histological findings and clinical evolution in this population [15, 17–19].

Adrenocortical carcinoma is potentially fatal. The five-year overall survival ranges from 35 to 58% in the more recent series [7, 9, 20, 21]. Stage is the most important prognostic factor, with a more advanced stage correlating with less durable survival rate [22, 23]. Unfortunately, in almost 70% of patients, the disease has spread beyond the adrenal gland at the time of diagnosis [24, 25]. Complete surgical resection of adrenal limited disease is the only potentially curative treatment procedure. Therapeutic options for more advanced diseases remain restricted. Mitotane (o,p′-DDD) is an isoform of the insecticide dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and is the only approved drug for ACC treatment. It is used for hormonal blockage of functional advanced diseases and is a direct antitumor activity drug [26–29]. However, mitotane is a difficult drug to manage because of its narrow therapeutic index and important side effects [28, 29]. Cytotoxic chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy have been used in the advanced setting but with limited responses [30]. Even the new classes of target therapies have not been useful for improving survival [31–34].

2. MicroRNA Function and Carcinogenesis

MicroRNAs (miRNA) are a class of noncoding RNAs of 19–22 nucleotides in length. They specifically bind the 3′-untranslated regions (3′UTR) of the messenger RNA (mRNA) molecule inducing their degradation or inhibiting their translation, causing partial or full silencing of the respective protein-coding gene [35]. The miRNAs are involved in the regulation of several physiological processes in almost all eukaryotes, including development, growth, differentiation, and metabolism. Therefore, the involvement of miRNAs as an important player in carcinogenesis was not surprising. The first evidence of miRNA involvement in neoplastic processes came from the observation that these genes are frequently located at fragile regions of the chromosomes [36]. However, it was only in 2002 that Calin et al. [37] reported the abnormal expression of miRNA in a human neoplasm. Patients diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and deletion of locus 13q14 presented low expression of two miRNAs, miR-15 and miR-16. Furthermore, two patients also presented germline mutation of one locus of miR-16-1 gene and loss-of-heterozygosity in the chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells, fulfilling the Knudson model of inactivation of a tumor-suppressor gene [38]. Lu et al. [39] analyzed the miRNA expression profile from multiple tumor samples. They demonstrated that miRNA expression profile was able to put together different tumor samples sharing the same development linage and to classify poor differentiated tumors based on their origins with a better correlation than mRNA profile performed in the same samples. Since then, several studies have reported miRNA expression profiles abnormalities in most variety of tumors. The miRNA profiles were able to classify tumors based on prognosis, chance of recurrence, or response to therapy [40]. In addition, miRNAs are particularly resistant to degradation from the widely spread RNAase enzymes [41]. Because of that, miRNAs are easily isolated from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples [42], stored biological samples [43], and various biological fluids [44]. It makes miRNAs a promising biomarker for human cancer.

3. MicroRNA Expression in Adrenocortical Tumors

The initial evidence of miRNA contribution in adrenocortical tumor pathogenesis came up with the observation that H19 gene product, previously recognized as a noncoding RNA, would be a miRNA precursor [45]. The H19 gene is located in 11p15 locus, the same region of insulin-like growth factor-2 (IGF2) gene. The H19 expression is downregulated in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and is inversely related to IGF2 [46]. To date, distinct studies reported miRNA expression profile in adults and one in pediatric adrenocortical tumors.

3.1. Adrenocortical Tumors in Adults

Tömböl et al. [47] performed miRNA profiling for 368 miRNAs using a quantitative PCR array technique (TaqMan low density array (TLDA)) in 7 ACCs, 9 cortisol producing adenomas, and 10 normal adrenocortical tissue samples. The array revealed significant differences in expression of 22 miRNAs among the experimental groups. Fourteen miRNAs were selected for further validation and significant differences were confirmed in 6 of them: miR-184, miR-210, miR-214, miR-375, miR-503 and miR-511. Of these, miR-184 and miR-503 were overexpressed in ACCs in comparison with normal and benign counterparts and miR-210 was upregulated in ACCs compared with adenomas. Expression of miR-511 and miR-214 was downregulated in ACCs relative to adenomas and normal samples, while miR-375 was upregulated in normal tissues compared with ACCs and ACA. In order to identify potential biomarkers of malignancy, miRNAs with the most significant delta CT (ΔCT) differences between ACCs and the other tissues were tested by receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis. When settling the cut-off value of ΔCTmiR-511-ΔCTmiR-503 to 1.4 (diagnosis of ACC if the difference is ≥1.4), ACC could be identified with 100% sensitivity and 97% specificity.

Soon et al. [48] studied 22 ACAs, 27 ACCs, and 6 normal adrenal cortex tissues using the Locked Nucleic Acid microarray technology. When comparing ACCs and ACAs, 23 microRNAs were differentially expressed, 14 upregulated, and 9 downregulated. Interestingly, one sample histologically classified as ACC and grouped together with adenomas in the miRNA profile had remained disease-free seven years after adrenal surgery. This finding suggests that this tumor might be considered as a false positive of the Weiss system. Additionally, primary adrenal and metastatic cervical lymph node from one patient had very similar miRNA expression pattern, suggesting that microRNAs could remain relatively stable between different tumor clones. Three miRNAs were selected for validation using quantitative PCR: miR-195 and miR-335 were significantly downregulated and miR-483-5p had a trend toward being upregulated in ACCs compared with ACAs. Nonetheless, ACC patients with upregulated miR-483-5p and downregulated miR-195 identified a group with poor cancer specific survival. It is noteworthy that miR-483 gene is located within intron 2 of IGF2, a gene frequently upregulated in adrenocortical carcinomas [49].

Patterson et al. [50] performed a microarray in 10 ACCs, 26 ACAs, and 21 normal adrenal cortices. Interestingly, the tumors were classified as carcinoma based on clinical characteristics, when gross local invasion or metastasis was identified at any time during the follow-up and not by the usually employed histologic criteria of Weiss score system. Twenty-three miRNAs were differently expressed between ACA and ACC, 5 upregulated, and 18 downregulated. Thirteen miRNAs were chosen for further validation by quantitative PCR and four of them maintained statistical difference between groups: miR-483-5p was upregulated while miR-195, miR-125b, and miR-100 were downregulated in ACCs compared with adenomas. The expression levels of IGF2 mRNA and miR-483-5p obtained a good correlation, suggesting they were coexpressed from this locus. They also demonstrated that an increased expression of miR-483-5p predicted malignancy with 80% sensitivity and 100% specificity.

Schmitz et al. [51] studied 667 miRNAs from 4 primary ACCs, 3 metastases of ACC, 5 cortisol producing adenomas, 4 aldosterone producing adenomas, and 4 normal adrenal cortices. Samples were obtained from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. Direct analysis between carcinomas and adenomas revealed 159 miRNAs downregulated and 35 upregulated while comparison between ACCs and APA revealed 38 miRNAs. Three downregulated genes, miR139-3p, miR-675, and miR-335, were validated with quantitative PCR. The authors proposed that expression levels of these miRNAs could differentiate malignant from benign adrenocortical tumors despite the small sample size of the study.

Özata et al. [52] studied 26 ACAs, 22 ACCs, and 4 normal cortex samples by microarray encompassing 903 human miRNAs genes. Unsupervised cluster utilizing the 213 miRNAs, most differently expressed, could reasonably discriminate carcinomas from adenomas and the normal adrenal cortices. Comparison between carcinomas and adenomas revealed 38 miRNAs overexpressed and 17 underexpressed miRNAs. Seven miRNAs were selected for verification on an expanded cohort based on their difference in expression or potential role in adrenal carcinogenesis. In accordance with the microarray results, quantitative PCR analyses demonstrated a significantly high expression of miR-483-5p, miR-483-3p, miR-10, and miR-21 and lower expression of miR-1974, miR-195, and miR-497 in ACCs when compared with adenomas and normal samples. High levels of miR-503, miR-1202, and miR-1275 were persistently associated with shorter survival in ACCs after the analysis of the microarray results and further validation in an expanded cohort. The authors also evaluated the functional consequences from the dysregulation of four miRNAs in a human ACC cell line. Inhibition of miR-483-5p and miR-483-3p led to a significant reduction in cell proliferation. In the same way, a cell transfected with anti-miR-483-3p but not with anti-miR-483-5p showed a significant increase in apoptosis. In addition, miR-483-3p expression level was inversely correlated with the proapoptotic PUMA protein. As expected, the overexpression of miR-195 or miR-497 resulted in a significant decrease in cell growth and a concomitant induction of cell death. Besides confirming results from previous studies and presenting new potential prognostic biomarkers, Özata et al. [52] also clarified the function of miR-483 and miR-195 expanding possibilities for new therapeutic options for advanced ACC patients.

Chabre et al. [53] performed a microarray profile of miRNA in 6 ACAs and 12 ACCs. Twelve miRNAs were differently expressed between adenomas and carcinomas, five underexpressed, and seven overexpressed. Eight miRNAs were chosen for validation in a cohort of 10 ACAs and 18 ACCs. The expression levels of miR-195 and miR-335 were lower in ACCs compared with ACAs. As in other studies, mir-483-5p was markedly upregulated in ACCs. Table 1 summarizes the main studies that compared microRNA expression profiles in adrenocortical tumors.

3.2. Adrenocortical Tumors in Children

Pediatric adrenocortical carcinoma is recognized for its distinct clinical, pathological, and molecular features [54]. To date, there is only one published study that evaluated miRNA expression profile in childhood adrenocortical tumors. Doghman et al. [55] analyzed 25 pediatric adrenocortical tumors and 5 age-matched normal adrenocortical tissue samples. They found 26 dysregulated miRNAs, most of them downregulated in tumors compared with the normal counterpart. Unsupervised cluster analysis of these tumors and normal samples could not clearly discriminate malignant from benign tumors, but three subclusters based on chance of relapse were identified. Not surprisingly, histological classification based on Weiss criteria was not significantly associated with any specific group of samples. Previous evidences indicate that the Weiss system is not entirely applicable to pediatric tumors and does not accurately predict clinical outcome in this population [56]. Interestingly, miR-483-3p was also upregulated in benign and malignant pediatric tumors, which is consistent with the finding that IGF2 is overexpressed in adrenocortical tumors independently of their malignancy [49]. Functional analysis of miR-99a and miR-100, which were among the highly downregulated miRNAs in tumors, was also performed. Additionally, these miRNAs share the same seed sequence, implying that they could regulate a common set of target mRNAs. It was demonstrated that in adenoma cells these specific miRNAs regulated IGF1R and mTOR signaling cascade at multiple levels.

3.3. MicroRNA Analysis in Blood Samples

More recently, three studies evaluated microRNAs in blood samples of adrenocortical tumor patients (Table 2). Patel et al. [57] analyzed five miRNAs in serum samples from 17 ACAs and 22 ACCs collected before adrenal surgery. Two of them, miR-34a and miR-483-5p, were found in greater levels in carcinomas than adenomas. The ROC curve analysis revealed a good accuracy for miR-34a (area under the curve = 0.83; ). There was no association of miRNAs serum expression levels with the extent of disease, positron emission tomography avidity, or disease-free survival time. Szabo et al. [58] demonstrated higher levels of several miRNAs, miR-100, miR-181b, miR-184, miR-210, and miR-483-5p, in plasma samples of a small group of patients with carcinomas when comparing to adenomas. Chabre et al. [53] assessed serum samples of 14 ACAs and 23 ACCs patients using five selected miRNAs. Blood samples from patients with ACC had lower levels of miR-195, miR-335, and miR-376a. On the other hand, miR-139-5p and miR-483-5p exhibited a higher level in the samples of patients diagnosed with adrenocortical carcinoma. The miR-195 was the best biomarker to discriminate malignant from benign tumors (area under the curve = 0.948; ), but miR-483-5p was able to differentiate recurring from nonrecurring tumors (area under the curve = 0.929; ). Additionally, higher levels of miR-483-5p and lower levels of miR-195 were associated with worse recurrence-free and overall survival.

4. Conclusions

The discovery of miRNAs as important regulators of gene expression has expanded our possibilities to understand tumor biology. However, many divergent data from published miRNA profiles in adrenocortical tumors still need to be understood. The correlation between miRNA profiles and the type of the genetic pathways differently activated in adrenocortical tumors, like mutant p53 or abnormal expression of β-catenin, would possibly explain some of these divergent findings as it could only reflect the selection of mutually exclusive drivers of tumorigenesis [59]. Among the assured results, miR-483 has the great potential to differentiate adenomas from carcinomas and aggressive from indolent carcinomas, and it might function as a therapeutic target.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported in part by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico Tecnológico (CNPq) Grants nos. 0025/2010-6 and 302825/2001-8 (to Ana Claudia Latronico).

References

R. T. Kloos, M. D. Gross, I. R. Francis, M. Korobkin, and B. Shapiro, “Incidentally discovered adrenal masses,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 460–484, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
G. B. Thompson and W. F. Young, “Adrenal incidentaloma,” Current Opinion in Oncology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 84–90, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. L. Wajchenberg, M. A. Albergaria Pereira, B. B. Medonca et al., “Adrenocortical carcinoma: clinical and laboratory observations,” Cancer, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 711–736, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Roman, “Adrenocortical carcinoma,” Current Opinion in Oncology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 36–42, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. P. B. Dackiw, J. E. Lee, R. F. Gagel, and D. B. Evans, “Adrenal cortical carcinoma,” World Journal of Surgery, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 914–926, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J.-P. Luton, S. Cerdas, L. Billaud et al., “Clinical features of adrenocortical carcinoma, prognostic factors, and the effect of mitotane therapy,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 322, no. 17, pp. 1195–1201, 1990.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Crucitti, R. Bellantone, A. Ferrante et al., “The italian registry for adrenal cortical carcinoma: analysis of a multiinstitutional series of 129 patients,” Surgery, vol. 119, no. 2, pp. 161–170, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Vassilopoulou-Sellin and P. N. Schultz, “Adrenocortical carcinoma. Clinical outcome at the end of the 20th century,” Cancer, vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 1113–1121, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Icard, P. Goudet, C. Charpenay et al., “Adrenocortical carcinomas: surgical trends and results of a 253-patient series from the French Association of Endocrine Surgeons Study Group,” World Journal of Surgery, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 891–897, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Michalkiewicz, R. Sandrini, B. Figueiredo et al., “Clinical and outcome characteristics of children with adrenocortical tumors: a report from the international pediatric adrenocortical tumor registry,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 838–845, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. N. Stewart, H. Flageole, and P. Kavan, “A surgical approach to adrenocortical tumors in children: the mainstay of treatment,” Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 759–763, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. M. Weiss, “Comparative histologic study of 43 metastasizing and nonmetastasizing adrenocortical tumors,” American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 163–169, 1984.
View at: Google Scholar
H. van Slooten, A. Schaberg, D. Smeenk, and A. J. Moolenaar, “Morphologic characteristics of benign and malignant adrenocortical tumors,” Cancer, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 766–773, 1985.
View at: Google Scholar
A. J. Hough, J. W. Hollified, D. L. Page, and W. H. Hartmann, “Prognostic factors in adrenal cortical tumors. A mathematical analysis of clinical and morphologic data,” American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 390–399, 1979.
View at: Google Scholar
L. M. Weiss, L. J. Medeiros, and A. L. Vickery Jr., “Pathologic features of prognostic significance in adrenocortical carcinoma,” American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 202–206, 1989.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Papotti, R. Libè, E. Duregon, M. Volante, J. Bertherat, and F. Tissier, “The Weiss score and beyond—histopathology for adrenocortical carcinoma,” Hormones and Cancer, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 333–340, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Aubert, A. Wacrenier, X. Leroy et al., “Weiss system revisited: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 49 adrenocortical tumors,” American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 1612–1619, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Wieneke, L. D. R. Thompson, and C. S. Heffess, “Adrenal cortical neoplasms in the pediatric population: a clinicopathologic and immunophenotypic analysis of 83 patients,” American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 867–881, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. B. Mendonca, A. M. Lucon, C. A. V. Menezes et al., “Clinical, hormonal and pathological findings in a comparative study of adrenocortical neoplasms in childhood and adulthood,” Journal of Urology, vol. 154, no. 6, pp. 2004–2009, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Fassnacht and B. Allolio, “Clinical management of adrenocortical carcinoma,” Best Practice and Research: Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 273–289, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Allolio and M. Fassnacht, “Clinical review: adrenocortical carcinoma: clinical update,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 2027–2037, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. M. Weiss, X. Bertagna, G. P. Chrousos et al., “Adrenal cortical carcinoma,” in Pathology and Genetics: Tumours of Endocrine Tumors, R. Delellis, Ed., World Health Organization, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Fassnacht, S. Johanssen, M. Quinkler et al., “Limited prognostic value of the 2004 International Union Against Cancer staging classification for adrenocortical carcinoma: proposal for a revised TNM classification,” Cancer, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 243–250, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
M. D. Wooten and D. K. King, “Adrenal cortical carcinoma. Epidemiology and treatment with mitotane and a review of the literature,” Cancer, vol. 72, no. 11, pp. 3145–3155, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
R. D. Schulick and M. F. Brennan, “Adrenocortical carcinoma,” World Journal of Urology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 26–34, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
H. R. Haak, J. Hermans, C. J. H. Van de Velde et al., “Optimal treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma with mitotane: results in a consecutive series of 96 patients,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 947–951, 1994.
View at: Google Scholar
S. K. Williamson, D. Lew, G. J. Miller, S. P. Balcerzak, L. H. Baker, and E. D. Crawford, “Phase II evaluation of cisplatin and etoposide followed by mitotane at disease progression in patients with locally advanced or metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma: a Southwest Oncology Group Study,” Cancer, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 1159–1165, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Baudin, G. Pellegriti, M. Bonnay et al., “Impact of monitoring plasma 1, 1-dichlorodiphenildichloroethane (o, p′DDD) levels on the treatment of patients with adrenocortical carcinoma,” Cancer, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 1385–1392, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
I. G. Hermsen, M. Fassnacht, M. Terzolo et al., “Plasma concentrations of o,p′DDD, o,p′DDA, and o,p′DDE as predictors of tumor response to mitotane in adrenocortical carcinoma: results of a retrospective ENS@T multicenter study,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 96, no. 6, pp. 1844–1851, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Fassnacht, M. Terzolo, B. Allolio et al., “Combination chemotherapy in advanced adrenocortical carcinoma,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 366, no. 23, pp. 2189–2197, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Wortmann, M. Quinkler, C. Ritter et al., “Bevacizumab plus capecitabine as a salvage therapy in advanced adrenocortical carcinoma,” European Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 162, no. 2, pp. 349–356, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Quinkler, S. Hahner, S. Wortmann et al., “Treatment of advanced adrenocortical carcinoma with erlotinib plus gemcitabine,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 93, no. 6, pp. 2057–2062, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kroiss, M. Quinkler, S. Johanssen et al., “Sunitinib in refractory adrenocortical carcinoma: a phase II, single-arm, open-label trial,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 97, no. 10, pp. 3495–3503, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Fraenkel, M. Gueorguiev, D. Barak, A. Salmon, A. B. Grossman, and D. J. Gross, “Everolimus therapy for progressive adrenocortical cancer,” Endocrine, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 187–192, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. W. Carthew and E. J. Sontheimer, “Origins and mechanisms of miRNAs and siRNAs,” Cell, vol. 136, no. 4, pp. 642–655, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. A. Calin and C. M. Croce, “MicroRNAs and chromosomal abnormalities in cancer cells,” Oncogene, vol. 25, no. 46, pp. 6202–6210, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. A. Calin, C. D. Dumitru, M. Shimizu et al., “Frequent deletions and down-regulation of micro-RNA genes miR15 and miR16 at 13q14 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99, no. 24, pp. 15524–15529, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. A. Calin, M. Ferracin, A. Cimmino et al., “A MicroRNA signature associated with prognosis and progression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 353, no. 17, pp. 1793–1801, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Lu, G. Getz, E. A. Miska et al., “MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers,” Nature, vol. 435, no. 7043, pp. 834–838, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. C. S. Cho, “MicroRNAs: potential biomarkers for cancer diagnosis, prognosis and targets for therapy,” International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1273–1281, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Chen, Y. Ba, L. Ma et al., “Characterization of microRNAs in serum: a novel class of biomarkers for diagnosis of cancer and other diseases,” Cell Research, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 997–1006, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Li, P. Smyth, R. Flavin et al., “Comparison of miRNA expression patterns using total RNA extracted from matched samples of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cells and snap frozen cells,” BMC Biotechnology, vol. 7, article 36, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Mraz, K. Malinova, J. Mayer, and S. Pospisilova, “MicroRNA isolation and stability in stored RNA samples,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 390, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Shen, S. A. Stass, and F. Jiang, “MicroRNAs as potential biomarkers in human solid tumors,” Cancer Letters, vol. 329, no. 2, pp. 125–136, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Cai and B. R. Cullen, “The imprinted H19 noncoding RNA is a primary microRNA precursor,” RNA, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 313–316, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Herbet, J. J. Feige, and M. Thomas, “Insights into the role of genetic alterations in adrenocortical tumorigenesis,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 300, no. 1-2, pp. 169–174, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Tömböl, P. M. Szabó, V. Molnár et al., “Integrative molecular bioinformatics study of human adrenocortical tumors: MicroRNA, tissue-specific target prediction, and pathway analysis,” Endocrine-Related Cancer, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 895–906, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. S. H. Soon, L. J. Tacon, A. J. Gill et al., “miR-195 and miR-483-5p identified as predictors of poor prognosis in adrenocortical cancer,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 15, no. 24, pp. 7684–7692, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Q. Almeida, M. C. B. V. Fragoso, C. F. P. Lotfi et al., “Expression of insulin-like growth factor-II and its receptor in pediatric and adult adrenocortical tumors,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 93, no. 9, pp. 3524–3531, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. E. Patterson, A. K. Holloway, J. Weng, T. Fojo, and E. Kebebew, “MicroRNA profiling of adrenocortical tumors reveals miR-483 as a marker of malignancy,” Cancer, vol. 117, no. 8, pp. 1630–1639, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. J. Schmitz, J. Helwig, S. Bertram et al., “Differential expression of microRNA-675, microRNA-139-3p and microRNA-335 in benign and malignant adrenocortical tumours,” Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 529–535, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. M. Özata, S. Caramuta, D. Velázquez-Fernández et al., “The role of microRNA deregulation in the pathogenesis of adrenocortical carcinoma,” Endocrine-Related Cancer, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 643–655, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Chabre, R. Libé, G. Assie et al., “Serum miR-483-5p and miR-195 are predictive of recurrence risk in adrenocortical cancer patients,” Endocrine-Related Cancer, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 579–594, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Faria and M. Q. Almeida, “Differences in the molecular mechanisms of adrenocortical tumorigenesis between children and adults,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 351, no. 1, pp. 52–57, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Doghman, A. El Wakil, B. Cardinaud et al., “Regulation of insulin-like growth factor-mammalian target of rapamycin signaling by MicroRNA in childhood adrenocortical tumors,” Cancer Research, vol. 70, no. 11, pp. 4666–4675, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. K. Lau and L. M. Weiss, “The Weiss system for evaluating adrenocortical neoplasms: 25 years later,” Human Pathology, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 757–768, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Patel, M. Boufraqech, M. Jain et al., “MiR-34a and miR-483-5p are candidate serum biomarkers for adrenocortical tumors,” Surgery, vol. 154, no. 6, pp. 1224–1229, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
D. R. Szabo, M. Luconi, P. M. Szabo et al., “Analysis of circulating microRNAs in adrenocortical tumors,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 331–339, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Ragazzon, R. Libé, S. Gaujoux et al., “Transcriptome analysis reveals that p53 and β-catenin alterations occur in a group of aggressive adrenocortical cancers,” Cancer Research, vol. 70, no. 21, pp. 8276–8281, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2014 João Evangelista Bezerra and Ana Claudia Latronico. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1701

Downloads

870

Citations