Review Article

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Elderly Patients with Multiple Myeloma: Past, Present, and Future

Table 2

Comparison of clinical outcomes of ASCT according to different age groups.

Authors (year)Median age
(range)
Number of
patients
Conditioning
regimen
TRMCRMedian
PFS
Median
OS

Siegel et al., (1999) [23]52 (37–64)49 MEL 2002%43%34 mo58 mo
67 (65–76)498%20%*18 mo40 mo

Sirohi et al., (2000) [24]55 (31–64)17 MEL 20012%47%23 mo36 mo
67 (65–74)1718%35%24 mo43 mo

Reece et al., (2003) [25]52 (30–59)382 MEL ± TBI and others6%34%27 mo39 mo
63 (60–73)1105%33%24 mo39 mo

Jantunen et al., (2006) [26]57 (39–64)79 MEL 2001%36%21 mo66 mo
68 (65–73)220%44%23 mo57 mo

Gertz et al., (2007) [27]≤65541MEL 2003%30%17 mo44 mo
>65137MEL 140–2003%40%17 mo44 mo

Kumar et al., (2008) [28]56 (37–65)60MEL 2000%28%18 mo53 mo
72 (70–76)33MEL 140–2003%42%29 moNR

El Cheikh et al., (2011) [29]62 (60–65)104MEL 140–2004%48%45 mo57% at 5 yr
69 (65–77)82MEL 100–2004%41%27 mo**54% at 5 yr

Muta et al., (2013) [30]60 (51–64)63MEL 180–2003%24%21 mo73 mo
67 (65–76)25MEL 100–2004%12%17 mo41 mo

TRM: treatment-related mortality; CR: complete response; PFS: progression-free survival; OS: overall survival; MEL: melphalan; TBI: total body irradiation; mo: months; yr: years; NR: not reached.
, .