About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
BioMed Research International
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 436029, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/436029
Review Article

Regenerative Repair of Damaged Meniscus with Autologous Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells

1Stems Medical Clinic, 32-3 Chungdam-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 135-950, Republic of Korea
2National Leading Research Laboratory, Department of Biological Sciences, Myongji University, 116 Myongjiro, Gyeonggido, Yongin 449-728, Republic of Korea

Received 28 August 2013; Revised 4 December 2013; Accepted 23 December 2013; Published 30 January 2014

Academic Editor: Antonio Salgado

Copyright © 2014 Jaewoo Pak et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are defined as pluripotent cells found in numerous human tissues, including bone marrow and adipose tissue. Such MSCs, isolated from bone marrow and adipose tissue, have been shown to differentiate into bone and cartilage, along with other types of tissues. Therefore, MSCs represent a promising new therapy in regenerative medicine. The initial treatment of meniscus tear of the knee is managed conservatively with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and physical therapy. When such conservative treatment fails, an arthroscopic resection of the meniscus is necessary. However, the major drawback of the meniscectomy is an early onset of osteoarthritis. Therefore, an effective and noninvasive treatment for patients with continuous knee pain due to damaged meniscus has been sought. Here, we present a review, highlighting the possible regenerative mechanisms of damaged meniscus with MSCs (especially adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ASCs)), along with a case of successful repair of torn meniscus with significant reduction of knee pain by percutaneous injection of autologous ASCs into an adult human knee.

1. Introduction

The menisci are two semilunar, fibrocartilaginous disks located between the medial and lateral articular surfaces of the femur and tibia in each knee. Their key functions are (i) the transfer of weight, (ii) absorption of shock during dynamic movements of the knee, and (iii) protecting the cartilage in the joint [1]. Therefore, damage in the meniscus can cause continuous knee pain. The meniscal damage can be diagnosed usually by physical exam and confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans [2]. With diagnosis, the knee pain due to meniscus tear is initially treated conservatively [3, 4]. If the initial conservative treatment fails, a meniscectomy is normally performed. However, the current treatment with meniscectomy, even with partial one, is associated with early onset of osteoarthritis of the knees [58]. Thus, the lack of noninvasive cure for the menisci damage presents a major therapeutic challenge. However, recent studies have shown possible articular cartilage regeneration using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in human patients with osteoarthritis and chondromalacia patellae [911]. The same MSCs have also been shown to regenerate bone-like tissue in osteonecrosis patients [12]. However, there has been no report of fibrous cartilage restoration in a patient with meniscus tear. Further, from June 2009, the Korean Food and Drug Administration has allowed medical uses of nonexpanded stem cells processed in a medical facility [13]. Here, we describe the possible regenerative mechanisms of damaged meniscus with MSCs (especially adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ASCs: one kind of MSCs)) and the first successful approach to reduce the knee pain by percutaneously injected autologous ASCs along with platelet-rich plasma (PRP), hyaluronic acid and CaCl2, an ASC mixture.

2. Regenerative Mechanisms of Damaged Meniscus

2.1. Direct Differentiation of the Stem Cells (MSCs)

MSCs were first identified and isolated from bone marrow (BM) in the late 1960s [14]. Subsequent studies demonstrated that these BM-derived MSCs possess self-renewal capacity and capability to form other cell types, such as adipocytes, osteoblasts, and chondrocytes [15]. Later, the International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT) established minimal criteria for defining MSCs based on characteristics found in the BM-derived MSCs.

According to ISCT, the criteria for identification of MSCs are as follows: (i) MSCs must adhere to plastic under standard culture conditions; (ii) MSCs must express the surface molecules CD105, CD73, and CD90 and lack expression of CD45, CD34, CD14 or CD11b, CD79α or CD19, and HLA-DR; and (iii) MSCs must have the capability to form osteocytes, adipocytes, and chondrocytes [16]. Since then, numerous studies have identified and isolated MSCs in almost all animal tissues, including human [1720]. MSCs are, thus, defined to be pluripotent cells found in numerous human tissues, including BM and adipose tissue. Such MSCs isolated from BM and adipose tissue have been shown to differentiate into bone, cartilage, and adipose tissue [21, 22].

Human ASCs were first discovered and identified in the early 2000s in the form of stromal vascular fraction (SVF) and shown to possess self-renewal capacity and the capability to differentiate into adipocytes, osteoblasts, and chondrocytes [2124]. In addition, ASCs were more readily available and were relatively easier to be isolated than BM.

Currently, ASCs have been shown to differentiate toward cells that are mesodermal and nonmesodermal in origin. In 2005, Brzoska et al. reported in vitro differentiation of ASCs into epithelial-like cells [25]. Subsequently, ASCs were shown to undergo differentiation into cells resembling corneal keratocytes, retinal pigment epithelial-like cells, dental bud-like structures, and renal tubular epithelium [2629]. The capability of ASCs to differentiate into endodermal cell types has also been reported. ASCs have been shown to undergo hepatic differentiation and they could be able to engraft into the liver and reconstitute some hepatocyte functions [3034]. ASCs have also been shown to form pancreatic islet-like cells, excreting insulin and glucagon [3537].

In case of meniscus repair, a few studies showing the direct differentiation of MSCs into meniscal cells were reported in animal models. Mizuno et al. reported that synovium-derived MSCs were able to attach to the meniscal defect of a rat and differentiate into cartilage cells [38, 39]. Another study showed that synovium-derived MSCs injected into rat knees adhered to the massive meniscal defects and differentiated into meniscal cells directly [40]. Zellner et al. showed that precultured BM-derived MSCs resulted in the regeneration of avascular meniscal tears with differentiated stable meniscus-like tissue in a rabbit model [41]. There was only one report showing that transplanted ASCs formed meniscal fibrocartilage in the healed zones of a rabbit [42]. These results indicated that transplanted MSCs could differentiate into meniscal cells and promote meniscal regeneration.

Potential mechanisms for regeneration and repair of damaged meniscus by MSCs (especially ASCs) can include the following: (i) transplanted cells differentiate into de novo tissue [42]; (ii) stem cells within the transplant replenish progenitor cells in the host [43]; and/or (iii) transplanted cells may fuse with host cells (in a process known as cell fusion) [43].

2.2. Trophic and Paracrine Effects of MSCs (Especially ASCs) on the Existing Meniscal Cartilage

Although the potential for ASCs to differentiate into various tissues of the body seems to be limitless, the ability of ASCs to promote tissue regeneration and repair may also depend on their paracrine effects. ASCs have the capability to secrete various growth factors that can modulate host tissue environment [44]. Such growth factors have been shown to have paracrine effects via neovascularization and immunosuppression. Neovascularization is a mechanism through which ASCs promote host tissue repair [45]. ASCs secrete vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) for neovascularization. These growth factors have been implicated in the ability of ASCs to repair scarred myocardium [45, 46]. Human ASCs have also been shown to promote revascularization of ischemic mouse hind limbs through HGF secretion, possibly via neovascularization [47, 48]. Such pro-angiogenic and paracrine effects may also contribute to the ability of ASCs to facilitate recovery from cerebral vascular injuries and account for ASC utility in the treatment of erectile dysfunction [4951].

When immunity has been oversurmounted, lymphocytes and mononuclear cells can damage the host tissue. ASCs can promote tissue repair and regeneration through immune-suppressing lymphocytes and peripheral blood mononuclear cells, thus preventing overinflammation [5254]. Some reports have shown that ASC-conditioned medium attenuates lymphocyte proliferation suggesting that ASCs secrete immunosuppressive factors [55, 56]. Proposed candidates for immunosuppressive effects of ASCs include prostaglandin E2, leukemia inhibitor factor, and kynurenine, a product of tryptophan metabolism [5558]. When ASCs were cocultured with lymphocytes, ASCs increased their secretion of each of these molecules [5558]. In addition, when ASCs were inhibited from producing these agents, the suppressive effects on lymphocyte proliferation by ASCs were not provided [5558].

In case of meniscal repair, implanted BM-derived MSCs can produce factors that inhibit scarring (fibrosis) and apoptosis, promote angiogenesis, and stimulate host progenitors to divide and differentiate into functional regenerative units [59]. Zellner et al. reported that BM-derived MSCs can promote meniscal healing in a rabbit model by synthesizing and secreting a broad spectrum of growth factors and cytokines, which can initiate a cascade of repair mechanisms and attract repair cells from the surrounding tissue [60]. There was no study showing that transplanted ASCs stimulated meniscal regeneration and repair.

Although it is not clear, at this time, if paracrine effects via neovascularization and immunosuppression are involved in regeneration and repair of meniscus, it is very possible that one of the many growth factors excreted by ASCs can have a profound trophic, paracrine effect on the surrounding intact meniscus.

2.3. Effects of Growth Factors Contained in PRP

Understanding platelet physiology has led to the concept of utilizing platelet growth factors in natural regenerative therapies. A simple centrifugation system can isolate and concentrate platelets from an autologous blood sample, producing platelet-rich plasma (PRP). PRP contains a high concentration of autologous growth factors. With activation, platelet degranulation is induced and a concentrated pool of autologous growth factors can be released to injured site to augment natural regenerative pathways [61, 62]. This process of degranulation initiates cellular proliferation and tissue repair responses. Some of the growth factors that are released during degranulation process are platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), transforming growth factor-β, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and epithelial growth factor (EGF) [61, 62].

Clinical applications of PRP have so far demonstrated encouraging therapeutic results. Mishra and Pavelko reported greater than 90% reduction in elbow pain with PRP injections of chronic elbow tendinosis [63]. Aspenberg and Virchenko verified by histology that a single PRP injection into a transected rat Achilles tendon had a greater maturation of tendon cells than control [64]. Anitua et al. hypothesized that the released growth factors from PRP have a chemotactic and mitogenic effect on MSCs [65]. These authors have also hypothesized that growth factors from PRP may also promote angiogenesis, stimulation of cellular protein synthesis, tissue remodeling, and formation of new extracellular matrix (ECM). In 2006, Eppley et al. reported that PRP stimulated endothelial cells for possible formation and proliferation of new capillary vessels [62]. Moreover, in 2009, Hu et al. observed expression of VEGF and PDGF in bone marrow induced by PRP and concluded that PRP can be a potential contributor in initiating angiogenesis [66]. Further, PRP has been shown to stimulate stem cells to proliferate as well as differentiate [67, 68].

Growth factors in PRP have been shown to enhance the healing properties of the inner avascular part of rabbit meniscal cells and to enhance the biological activities of the meniscal cells for meniscal tissue regeneration [69, 70].

Potential mechanisms for possible regeneration of the damaged meniscus by PRP can include the following: (i) platelet growth factors can be released to damaged meniscus to augment natural regenerative pathways; (ii) the released growth factors from PRP have a chemotactic and mitogenic effect on MSCs; (iii) PRP can be a potential contributor in initiating angiogenesis; and/or (iv) PRP has been shown to stimulate stem cells to proliferate as well as differentiate.

2.4. Extracellular Matrix Production by Chondrocytes Stimulated by Low Physiologic Doses of Dexamethasone

In addition to PRP growth factors, various other elements can affect MSC differentiation in their natural environment [7175]. One of the elements of note is the physiologic doses of dexamethasone. Several authors have shown that, in vitro, nanodoses of dexamethasone influence MSCs to differentiate toward chondrogenic [7678] or osteogenic [79, 80] lineage. Although, in vivo, physiologic doses of dexamethasone are present for MSCs to differentiate toward chondrogenic or osteogenic lineage, additional supplement of physiologic doses of dexamethasone with transplanted MSCs would ensure differentiation of MSCs to chondrocytes or osteogenic cells. Although it is not clear, it is very possible that the MSCs’ differentiation induced by low physiologic doses of dexamethasone can affect regenerative repair of damaged meniscus.

3. Clinical Application of ASCs to Repair Damaged Meniscus

According to Korean law (Rules and Regulations of the Korean Food and Drug Administration), this study does not need approval by ethics and science committees [13]. Further, this clinical study was in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and regulation guidelines of the Korean Food and Drug Administration. An informed consent was obtained from the patient.

3.1. Materials and Methods

The inclusion criteria, exclusion criteria, and outcome endpoints are listed in Tables 1, 2, and 3.

tab1
Table 1: Inclusion criteria.
tab2
Table 2: Exclusion criteria.
tab3
Table 3: Outcome endpoints (obtained at three months after treatment).

For pain score, functional rating index, visual analog scale (VAS), physical therapy (PT), and range of motion (ROM) were determined as previously described [81, 82].

The patient was restricted from taking steroids, aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and Asian herbal medications for one week prior to the procedure.

In the operating room, approximately 40 mL of packed adipose tissue was obtained by liposuction of the subcutaneous layer of the lower abdominal area using sterile techniques [11]. The stromal vascular fraction (SVF) containing ASCs was separated from the lipoaspirates by a fat stem cell isolator (SCELDIS, ED Co., Ltd., Republic of Korea) after treatment with collagenase.

ASCs were extracted through the use of digestive enzymes (0.07% type 1 collagenase; Adilase, Worthington, Lakewood, NJ, USA) and centrifugation (500 g) [11, 12, 24]. The total volume of the solution containing ASCs was 8.5 mL. While preparing the ASCs, 30 mL autologous blood were drawn along with 2.5 mL anticoagulant citrate dextrose solution (0.8% citric acid, 0.22% sodium citrate, and 0.223% dextrose; Baxter Healthcare Corp., Marion, NC, USA). After centrifugation (100 g, then 1000 g), 4.4 mL of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) along with the Buffy coat was obtained. Hyaluronic acid (0.5% (w/v), 2 mL; Huons, Chungbuk, Korea) was added as a scaffold to this mixture, and 3% (w/v) CaCl2 (0.1 mL; Choongwae Pharmaceutical Co., Gyeonggido, Korea) was added to activate PRP. These ASCs along with PRP, hyaluronic acid, and CaCl2 stand for the ASC mixture.

After the left knee was cleaned with 5% povidone-iodine (Choongwae Pharmaceutical Co., Seoul, Korea) and draped in a sterile fashion, the injection site was anesthetized with 2% lidocaine (Daehan Pharmaceutical Co., Gyeonggido, Korea). On the day of liposuction, the ASC mixture (15 mL) was injected into the medial Tibiofemoral joint and into the medial inferior retropatellar joint on the day of liposuction with a 20-gauge, 1 1/2-inch needle under ultrasonic guidance. On the third and seventh day after the initial injection, another dose of PRP with CaCl2 and hyaluronic acid (1 mL) was injected in the same fashion as the first day. On the fourteenth day after the initial injection, a low-dose (254.8 nmol/L) dexamethasone (Huons, Chungbuk, Korea) was added to PRP with CaCl2. On day 28, the last dose of PRP with CaCl2 was injected.

The patient was followed up with telephone questionnaires every six months at 6, 12, and 18 months. Each time, the patient was asked the following questions. (i) Was the symptom improvement persistent? (ii) Did you experience any complications (e.g., infection, illness) you believe may be due to the procedure? If yes or maybe, please explain. (iii) Have you been diagnosed with any form of cancer since the procedure? If yes, please explain.

3.2. Result

A 32-year-old female has been experiencing left knee pain for the last two years prior to the office visit. The patient denied any history of significant trauma, except exercising on a treadmill. On the day of the initial evaluation, she reported moderate pain (visual analog scale (VAS) score of 5) on rest and increased pain when walking (VAS walking index (VWI) of 7; Figure 1(a)). She also complained of mild knee swelling. On physical examination, there were mild knee joint edema, minimally decreased range of motion, and mild tenderness with flexion. Apley and McMurray’s tests were questionably negative, and there was no ligament laxity. To rule out bursitis, osteoarthritis, tendinitis, and muscle spasm, all of which could cause similar types of knee pain and must be carefully sought in this study, an MRI of the knee was performed. The MRI showed Grade II meniscal tear (Figures 2(a), 2(c), 3(a), and 3(c)). Owing to continuous pain (functional rating index (FRI): 18; Figure 1(a)), the patient initially tried treatments comprising nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, physical therapy, PRP, and hyaluronic acid. However, these therapies failed.

fig1
Figure 1: (a) Outcome of pain measurements. (b) Range of motion from the patient. VAS is visual analog scale and error bars indicate standard deviations ().
fig2
Figure 2: MRI sagittal sequential T2 views of the knee. Pretreatment MRI scans ((a) (sequential image: 5/20) and (c) (6/20)) show a tear (arrow) within the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. Posttreatment MRI scans at three months ((b) (5/20) and (d) (6/20)) indicate the healed meniscus (triangle) that has been repaired by ASCs mixture-based treatment.
fig3
Figure 3: MRI coronal sequential T2 views of the knee. Pretreatment MRI scans ((a) (sequential image: 14/20) and (c) (15/20)) show a tear (arrow) within the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. Posttreatment MRI scans at three months ((b) (14/20) and (d) (15/20)) indicate the healed meniscus (triangle) that has been restored by ASCs mixture-based treatment.

When such conservative treatment fails, an arthroscopic resection of the meniscus is necessary [1]. The major drawback of the meniscectomy is the early onset of osteoarthritis of the knee [83]. With the increasing recognition of the meniscus as an important structure of the knee, meniscal repair has become the preferred treatment of choice over meniscectomy [84].

From June 2009, autologous, noncultured ASCs can now be used as a source of MSCs in Korea [11]. Being aware of the fact that ASCs have been allowed by Korean Food and Drug Administration, and being wary of the possibility of early onset of osteoarthritis, the patient wanted to try autologous noncultured ASC mixture-based treatments for the repair of the damaged meniscus.

After obtaining autologous ASCs and preparing PRP as previously described [4, 5], the ASC mixture was percutaneously injected under the ultrasound guidance into the knee joint of the patient. Three months after the treatment, the patient’s symptoms improved (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)) and repeated MRI showed almost complete disappearance of the torn meniscus (Figures 2(b), 2(d), 3(b), and 3(d)).

The patient was offered the sixth, twelfth, and eighteenth month postprocedure MRIs, but she refused to undergo postprocedure MRIs due to symptom improvement and financial reasons. Therefore, the longer-term (more than three months) followups were conducted based on telephone questionnaires. Until 18 months, her symptom improvement was persistent and she did not report any serious side effects (cancer or any complications). A recent report supports this result [85]. Because ASCs and PRP are autologous in nature, no rejection was expected and none occurred.

4. Discussion

A diagnostic MRI of the knee was performed on the patient before ASC mixture-based treatment. Consequently, posttreatment MRIs were performed to compare pre- and posttreatment images. The MRI T2 sequence was used for its ability to show bony anatomy. Due to slight differences in patient positioning and slight movement of the patient during the MRI procedures, there was some difficulty in capturing the exact and identical treatment location. However, the pre-and posttreatment MRI results can be compared with sequential views to compensate for any possible errors [12].

In the clinical result of ASC mixture application, significant MRI signal changes were apparent in the T2 views of the knee along injection sites (the medial Tibiofemoral joint and the medial inferior retropatellar joint). These significant signal changes can be interpreted as signs of persistent and restored meniscus. Due to reduction in the knee pain, the patient was reluctant to undergo a knee meniscal biopsy to determine the true nature of the cartilage-like tissue. Although the true nature of the restored tissue is unclear, the torn meniscus is believed to be restored, based on previous studies showing cartilage recovery using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in patients with osteonecrosis, osteoarthritis, and chondromalacia patellae [9, 10]. The reduction in the knee pain and significant MRI signal changes support this notion.

With regard to the mechanism of the possible regenerative meniscal repair, there are few plausible possibilities: (i) direct differentiation of the stem cells (e.g., ASCs) [2143]; (ii) trophic and paracrine effects of ASCs on the existing tissue (e.g., meniscal cartilage) [4460]; (iii) effects of growth factors contained in PRP [6166, 69, 70]; (iv) the ASCs’ differentiation induced by low physiologic doses of dexamethasone [7180]; or (v) combination of all of the above-mentioned possibilities. Based on previous reports [912] and this clinical result, it is evident that ASCs most likely play an important role in the repair of the torn meniscus. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a successful restoration of the torn meniscus by using the new ASC mixture-based regimen.

It has been estimated that approximately 400,000 ASCs are contained in 1 mL of adipose tissue [86]. Because 40 mL centrifuged adipose tissue was harvested, it is believed that approximately 16,000,000 stem cells were extracted and injected into the knee joint.

Although this clinical report was not a randomized and controlled trial, the key clinical feature of this clinical result is demonstrating the possible availability of potentially effective and noninvasive treatment in patients with continuous knee pain due to meniscus tear. In addition, although there was no placebo (ASC-free) group, the patient had received PRP and hyaluronic acid injections without ASCs. This treatment did not provide any clinical improvement. The patient experienced significant reduction of the knee pain only after percutaneous injection of ASC mixture.

Conflict of Interests

The authors have no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Research Lab Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (no. 2011-0027928); the Marine and Extreme Genome Research Center Program funded by Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Republic of Korea; and the Next Generation BioGreen 21 Program (no. PJ009082) of Rural Development Administration in Republic of Korea. The authors appreciate the SVF extraction and consultation of ED Co., Ltd. (SCELDIS, Republic of Korea). Jaewoo Pak and Jung Hun Lee worked equally on this paper.

References

  1. M. Englund, A. Guermazi, D. Gale et al., “Incidental meniscal findings on knee MRI in middle-aged and elderly persons,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 359, no. 11, pp. 1108–1115, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. T. Magee and D. Williams, “3.0-T MRI of meniscal tears,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 187, no. 2, pp. 371–375, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K. E. DeHaven, “Decision-making factors in the treatment of meniscus lesions,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, no. 252, pp. 49–54, 1990. View at Scopus
  4. A. P. Newman, A. U. Daniels, and R. T. Burks, “Principles and decision making in meniscal surgery,” Arthroscopy, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 33–51, 1993. View at Scopus
  5. U. Jorgensen, S. Sonne-Holm, F. Lauridsen, and A. Rosenklint, “Long-term follow-up of meniscectomy in athletes. A prospective longitudinal study,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery B, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 80–83, 1987. View at Scopus
  6. H. Roos, M. Lauren, T. Adalberth, E. M. Roos, K. Jonsson, and L. S. Lohmander, “Knee osteoarthritis after meniscectomy: prevalence of radiographic changes after twenty-one years, compared with matched controls,” Arthritis & Rheumatism, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 687–693, 1998.
  7. M. Englund, E. M. Roos, and L. S. Lohmander, “Impact of type of meniscal tear on radiographic and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a sixteen-year followup of meniscectomy with matched controls,” Arthritis & Rheumatism, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 2178–2187, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. C. A. Petty and J. H. Lubowitz, “Does arthroscopic partial meniscectomy result in knee osteoarthritis? A systematic review with a minimum of 8 years' follow-up,” Arthroscopy, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 419–424, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. J. Centeno, D. Busse, J. Kisiday, C. Keohan, M. Freeman, and D. Karli, “Increased knee cartilage volume in degenerative joint disease using percutaneously implanted, autologous mesenchymal stem cells,” Pain Physician, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 343–353, 2008. View at Scopus
  10. J. Pak, J. H. Lee, and S. H. Lee, “A novel biological approach to treat chondromalacia patellae,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 5, Article ID e64569, 2013.
  11. J. Pak, “Regeneration of human bones in hip osteonecrosis and human cartilage in knee osteoarthritis with autologous adipose-tissue-derived stem cells: a case series,” Journal of Medical Case Reports, vol. 5, article 296, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. Pak, “Autologous adipose tissue-derived stem cells induce persistent bone-like tissue in osteonecrotic femoral heads,” Pain Physician, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 75–85, 2012. View at Scopus
  13. Korean Food and Drug Administration (KFDA), “Cell therapy: Rules and Regulations,” KFDA, Chapter 2, Section 14, pp. 4, 2009.
  14. A. J. Friedenstein, K. V. Petrakova, A. I. Kurolesova, and G. P. Frolova, “Heterotopic of bone marrow. Analysis of precursor cells for osteogenic and hematopoietic tissues,” Transplantation, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 230–247, 1968. View at Scopus
  15. M. F. Pittenger, A. M. Mackay, S. C. Beck et al., “Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells,” Science, vol. 284, no. 5411, pp. 143–147, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Dominici, K. Le Blanc, I. Mueller et al., “Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement,” Cytotherapy, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 315–317, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. L. da Silva Meirelles, P. C. Chagastelles, and N. B. Nardi, “Mesenchymal stem cells reside in virtually all post-natal organs and tissues,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 119, no. 11, pp. 2204–2213, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. F. P. Luyten, “Mesenchymal stem cells in osteoarthritis,” Current Opinion in Rheumatology, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 599–603, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. D. Magne, C. Vinatier, M. Julien, P. Weiss, and J. Guicheux, “Mesenchymal stem cell therapy to rebuild cartilage,” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 519–526, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. M. Murphy, D. J. Fink, E. B. Hunziker, and F. P. Barry, “Stem cell therapy in a caprine model of osteoarthritis,” Arthritis & Rheumatism, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 3464–3474, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. J. Szilvassy, “The biology of hematopoietic stem cells,” Archives of Medical Research, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 446–460, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. P. A. Zuk, M. Zhu, H. Mizuno et al., “Multilineage cells from human adipose tissue: implications for cell-based therapies,” Tissue Engineering, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 211–228, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. Y.-D. C. Halvorsen, D. Franklin, A. L. Bond et al., “Extracellular matrix mineralization and osteoblast gene expression by human adipose tissue-derived stromal cells,” Tissue Engineering, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 729–741, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. P. A. Zuk, M. Zhu, P. Ashjian et al., “Human adipose tissue is a source of multipotent stem cells,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 4279–4295, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. Brzoska, H. Geiger, S. Gauer, and P. Baer, “Epithelial differentiation of human adipose tissue-derived adult stem cells,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 330, no. 1, pp. 142–150, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. Y. Du, D. S. Roh, M. L. Funderburgh et al., “Adipose-derived stem cells differentiate to keratocytes in vitro,” Molecular Vision, vol. 16, pp. 2680–2689, 2010. View at Scopus
  27. U. Vossmerbaeumer, S. Ohnesorge, S. Kuehl et al., “Retinal pigment epithelial phenotype induced in human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells,” Cytotherapy, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 177–188, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. F. Ferro, R. Spelat, G. Falini et al., “Adipose tissue-derived stem cell in vitro differentiation in a three-dimensional dental bud structure,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 178, no. 5, pp. 2299–2310, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. K. Li, Q. Han, X. Yan, L. Liao, and R. C. Zhao, “Not a process of simple vicariousness, the differentiation of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells to renal tubular epithelial cells plays an important role in acute kidney injury repairing,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1267–1275, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. J. Seo, S. Y. Suh, Y. C. Bae, and J. S. Jung, “Differentiation of human adipose stromal cells into hepatic lineage in vitro and in vivo,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 328, no. 1, pp. 258–264, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. A. Banas, T. Teratani, Y. Yamamoto et al., “Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells as a source of human hepatocytes,” Hepatology, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 219–228, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. H. Aurich, M. Sgodda, P. Kaltwaßer et al., “Hepatocyte differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells from human adipose tissue in vitro promotes hepatic integration in vivo,” Gut, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 570–581, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. D. H. Kim, C. M. Je, J. Y. Sin, and J. S. Jung, “Effect of partial hepatectomy on in vivo engraftment after intravenous administration of human adipose tissue stromal cells in mouse,” Microsurgery, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 424–431, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. A. Banas, T. Teratani, Y. Yamamoto et al., “Rapid hepatic fate specification of adipose-derived stem cells and their therapeutic potential for liver failure,” Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 70–77, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. V. Chandra, S. G, S. Phadnis, P. D. Nair, and R. R. Bhonde, “Generation of pancreatic hormone-expressing islet-like cell aggregates from murine adipose tissue-derived stem cells,” Stem Cells, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1941–1953, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. V. Chandra, S. G, S. Muthyala et al., “Islet-like cell aggregates generated from human adipose tissue derived stem cells ameliorate experimental diabetes in mice,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 6, Article ID e20615, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. G. Lin, G. Wang, G. Liu et al., “Treatment of type 1 diabetes with adipose tissue-derived stem cells expressing pancreatic duodenal homeobox 1,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 1399–1406, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. K. Mizuno, T. Muneta, T. Morito et al., “Exogenous synovial stem cells adhere to defect of meniscus and differentiate into cartilage cells,” Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 101–111, 2008. View at Scopus
  39. E. Ong, M. Chimutengwende-Gordon, and W. Khan, “Stem cell therapy for knee ligament, articular cartilage and meniscal injuries,” Current Stem Cell Research & Therapy, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 422–428, 2013.
  40. M. Horie, I. Sekiya, T. Muneta et al., “Intra-articular injected synovial stem cells differentiate into meniscal cells directly and promote meniscal regeneration without mobilization to distant organs in rat massive meniscal defect,” Stem Cells, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 878–887, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. J. Zellner, K. Hierl, M. Mueller, et al., “Stem cell-based tissue-engineering for treatment of meniscal tears in the avascular zone,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research B, vol. 101, no. 7, pp. 1133–1142, 2013.
  42. M. Á. Ruiz-Ibán, J. Díaz-Heredia, I. García-Gómez, F. Gonzalez-Lizán, E. Elías-Martín, and V. Abraira, “The effect of the addition of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells to a meniscal repair in the avascular zone: an experimental study in rabbits,” Arthroscopy, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 1688–1696, 2011.
  43. M. B. Coelho, J. M. Cabral, and J. M. Karp, “Intraoperative stem cell therapy,” Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 14, pp. 325–349, 2012.
  44. A. J. Salgado, R. L. Reis, N. J. Sousa, and J. M. Gimble, “Adipose tissue derived stem cells secretome: soluble factors and their roles in regenerative medicine,” Current Stem Cell Research & Therapy, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 103–110, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. L. Cai, B. H. Johnstone, T. G. Cook et al., “IFATS collection: human adipose tissue-derived stem cells induce angiogenesis and nerve sprouting following myocardial infarction, in conjunction with potent preservation of cardiac function,” Stem Cells, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 230–237, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. Y. Miyahara, N. Nagaya, M. Kataoka et al., “Monolayered mesenchymal stem cells repair scarred myocardium after myocardial infarction,” Nature Medicine, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 459–465, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. H. Nakagami, K. Maeda, R. Morishita et al., “Novel autologous cell therapy in ischemic limb disease through growth factor secretion by cultured adipose tissue-derived stromal cells,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 2542–2547, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. L. Cai, B. H. Johnstone, T. G. Cook et al., “Suppression of hepatocyte growth factor production impairs the ability of adipose-derived stem cells to promote ischemic tissue revascularization,” Stem Cells, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 3234–3243, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. J.-M. Kim, S.-T. Lee, K. Chu et al., “Systemic transplantation of human adipose stem cells attenuated cerebral inflammation and degeneration in a hemorrhagic stroke model,” Brain Research, vol. 1183, no. 1, pp. 43–50, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. M. M. Garcia, T. M. Fandel, G. Lin et al., “Treatment of erectile dysfunction in the obese type 2 diabetic ZDF rat with adipose tissue-derived stem cells,” The Journal of Sexual Medicine, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 89–98, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. Y.-C. Huang, H. Ning, A. W. Shindel et al., “The effect of intracavernous injection of adipose tissue-derived stem cells on hyperlipidemia-associated erectile dysfunction in a rat model,” The Journal of Sexual Medicine, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1391–1400, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. B. Puissant, C. Barreau, P. Bourin et al., “Immunomodulatory effect of human adipose tissue-derived adult stem cells: comparison with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 118–129, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. R. Yañez, M. L. Lamana, J. García-Castro, I. Colmenero, M. Ramírez, and J. A. Bueren, “Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells have in vivo immunosuppressive properties applicable for the control of the graft-versus-host disease,” Stem Cells, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 2582–2591, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. P. Niemeyer, M. Kornacker, A. Mehlhorn et al., “Comparison of immunological properties of bone marrow stromal cells and adipose tissue-derived stem cells before and after osteogenic differentiation in vitro,” Tissue Engineering, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 111–121, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. L. Cui, Y. Shuo, W. Liu, N. Li, W. Zhang, and Y. Cao, “Expanded adipose-derived stem cells suppress mixed lymphocyte reaction by secretion of prostaglandin E2,” Tissue Engineering, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1185–1195, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. O. Delarosa, E. Lombardo, A. Beraza et al., “Requirement of IFN-γ-mediated indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase expression in the modulation of lymphocyte proliferation by human adipose-derived stem cells,” Tissue Engineering A, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 2795–2806, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. R. Yañez, A. Oviedo, M. Aldea, J. A. Bueren, and M. L. Lamana, “Prostaglandin E2 plays a key role in the immunosuppressive properties of adipose and bone marrow tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 316, no. 19, pp. 3109–3123, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. M. Najar, G. Raicevic, H. I. Boufker et al., “Adipose-tissue-derived and Wharton's jelly-derived mesenchymal stromal cells suppress lymphocyte responses by secreting leukemia inhibitory factor,” Tissue Engineering A, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 3537–3546, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. A. I. Caplan and J. E. Dennis, “Mesenchymal stem cells as trophic mediators,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 98, no. 5, pp. 1076–1084, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. J. Zellner, M. Mueller, A. Berner et al., “Role of mesenchymal stem cells in tissue engineering of meniscus,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research A, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 1150–1161, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. R. E. Marx, “Platelet-rich plasma: evidence to support its use,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 489–496, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. B. L. Eppley, W. S. Pietrzak, and M. Blanton, “Platelet-rich plasma: a review of biology and applications in plastic surgery,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 118, no. 6, pp. 147e–159e, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. A. Mishra and T. Pavelko, “Treatment of chronic elbow tendinosis with buffered platelet-rich plasma,” American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 1774–1778, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. P. Aspenberg and O. Virchenko, “Platelet concentrate injection improves Achilles tendon repair in rats,” Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 93–99, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. E. Anitua, I. Andia, B. Ardanza, P. Nurden, and A. T. Nurden, “Autologous platelets as a source of proteins for healing and tissue regeneration,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 4–15, 2004. View at Scopus
  66. Z. Hu, S. A. F. Peel, S. K. C. Ho, G. K. B. Sándor, and C. M. L. Clokie, “Platelet-rich plasma induces mRNA expression of VEGF and PDGF in rat bone marrow stromal cell differentiation,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 43–48, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. J. Zhang and J. H.-C. Wang, “Platelet-rich plasma releasate promotes differentiation of tendon stem cells into active tenocytes,” American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 2477–2486, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. S. N. Zhao, W. F. Liu, and Z. T. Zhang, “Effect of platelet-rich plasma on cell proliferation and osteogenic activity of pulp stem cells,” Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 177–182, 2013.
  69. K. Ishida, R. Kuroda, M. Miwa et al., “The regenerative effects of platelet-rich plasma on meniscal cells in vitro and its in vivo application with biodegradable gelatin hydrogel,” Tissue Engineering, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1103–1112, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. H. L. Braun, A. S. Wasterlain, and J. L. Dragoo, “The use of PRP in ligament and meniscal healing,” Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 206–212, 2013.
  71. P. Cassiede, J. E. Dennis, F. Ma, and A. I. Caplan, “Osteochondrogenic potential of marrow mesenchymal progenitor cells exposed to TGF-β1 or PDGF-BB as assayed in vivo and in vitro,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 1264–1273, 1996. View at Scopus
  72. D. R. Carter, G. S. Beaupré, N. J. Giori, and J. A. Helms, “Mechanobiology of skeletal regeneration,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, no. 355, supplement, pp. S41–S55, 1998. View at Scopus
  73. S. P. Bruder, D. J. Fink, and A. I. Caplan, “Mesenchymal stem cells in bone development, bone repair, and skeletal regeneration therapy,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 283–294, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. J. H. Cui, K. Park, S. R. Park, and B.-H. Min, “Effects of low-intensity ultrasound on chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells embedded in polyglycolic acid: an in vivo study,” Tissue Engineering, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 75–82, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. M. V. Risbud, T. J. Albert, A. Guttapalli et al., “Differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells towards a nucleus pulposus-like phenotype in vitro: implications for cell-based transplantation therapy,” Spine, vol. 29, no. 23, pp. 2627–2632, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. D. Bosnakovski, M. Mizuno, G. Kim, S. Takagi, M. Okumura, and T. Fujinaga, “Chondrogenic differentiation of bovine bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in different hydrogels: influence of collagen type II extracellular matrix on MSC chondrogenesis,” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 93, no. 6, pp. 1152–1163, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. A. Scutt and P. Bertram, “Basic fibroblast growth factor in the presence of dexamethasone stimulates colony formation, expansion, and osteoblastic differentiation by rat bone marrow stromal cells,” Calcified Tissue International, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 69–77, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. Y. Zhang, C. Wang, W. Liao et al., “In vitro chondrogenic phenotype differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells,” Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 275–278, 2004. View at Scopus
  79. I.-H. Song, A. I. Caplan, and J. E. Dennis, “In vitro dexamethasone pretreatment enhances bone formation of human mesenchymal stem cells in vivo,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 916–921, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. F. Langenbach and J. R. Handschel, “On the use of dexamethasone-loaded liposomes to induce the osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells,” Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  81. M. J. D. Childs and S. R. Piva, “Psychometric properties of the functional rating index in patients with low back pain,” European Spine Journal, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1008–1012, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. D. D. Price, P. A. McGrath, A. Rafii, and B. Buckingham, “The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain,” Pain, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 45–56, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. M. Englund and L. S. Lohmander, “Risk factors for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis fifteen to twenty-two years after meniscectomy,” Arthritis & Rheumatism, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 2811–2819, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. T. Stein, A. P. Mehling, F. Welsch, R. von Eisenhart-Rothe, and A. Jäger, “Long-term outcome after arthroscopic meniscal repair versus arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for traumatic meniscal tears,” American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 1542–1548, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. J. Pak, J.-J. Chang, J. H. Lee, and S. H. Lee, “Safety reporting on implantation of autologous adipose tissue-derived stem cells with platelet-rich plasma into human articular joints,” Musculoskeletal Disorders, vol. 14, article 337, 2013.
  86. L. Aust, B. Devlin, S. J. Foster et al., “Yield of human adipose-derived adult stem cells from liposuction aspirates,” Cytotherapy, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 7–14, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus