Research Article

A Comparison Study of Portable Foot-to-Foot Bioelectrical Impedance Scale to Measure Body Fat Percentage in Asian Adults and Children

Table 3

Methodological correlations of foot-to-foot BIA against direct segmental multifrequency BIA reference method for body fat percentage in adults and children .

Adults SEETotal error, Mean differencesSlopeInterceptStandardized coefficient

All0.926**0.8583.6623.1120.58 (−1.89, 3.43)0.771.020.926
GenderMen0.916**0.8392.7953.192−1.81 (−3.09, −0.53)*1.19−2.522.499
Women0.913**0.8333.3093.117−1.16 (−2.15, −0.17)*0.991.462.492
BMI groupsNormal/underweight0.916**0.8402.4653.030−0.96 (−2.17, 0.24)1.244.52.499
Obese/overweight0.889**0.7903.6103.233−1.76 (−2.80, −0.73)0.895.512.433
EthnicityMalay0.924**0.8543.2653.208−2.15 (−3.13, −1.17)**0.871.940.924
Chinese0.933**0.8703.4093.204−0.20 (−1.73, 1.34)0.834.480.933
Indian0.913**0.8333.1182.780−1.08 (−3.37, 1.22)0.767.120.913

Children SEETotal error, Mean differencesSlopeInterceptStandardized coefficient

All0.949**0.9024.1834.7356.31 (4.73, 9.11)**0.736.920.949
GenderBoys0.946**0.8955.4404.8112.99 (1.20, 4.80)*0.755.712.575
Girls0.96**0.9215.2684.6030.91 (−1.76, 3.58)0.718.482.612
BMI groupsNormal/underweight0.935**0.8743.7822.885−0.99 (−2.30, 0.33)0.824.512.547
Obese/overweight0.825**0.6816.4936.4235.19 (2.97, 7.41)**0.5515.832.282
EthnicityMalay0.936**0.8775.4534.1112.28 (0.40, 4.17)*1.142.010.936
Chinese0.979**0.9593.6533.5180.26 (−3.37, 3.90)1.336.480.979
Indian0.946**0.8945.6996.3223.10 (−0.15, 6.34)1.45−13.880.946

Mean differences are presented in mean (95% confidence interval). : correlation coefficient between BF% measured with foot-to-foot BIA and reference method; indicates how well the BF% measured with foot-to-foot BIA fits the goodness of fit line; SEE: standardized estimated errors; : total error; ; .