About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
BioMed Research International
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 481914, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/481914
Review Article

Folic Acid Supplementation and Preterm Birth: Results from Observational Studies

1Sezione di Ostetricia e Ginecologia, Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita e della Riproduzione, Università degli Studi di Verona, Piazzale Ludovico Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy
2Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126 Verona, Italy

Received 18 November 2013; Revised 1 January 2014; Accepted 1 January 2014; Published 3 March 2014

Academic Editor: Allegaert Karel

Copyright © 2014 Elena Mantovani et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Introduction. Folic acid (FA) supplementation is recommended worldwide in the periconceptional period for the prevention of neural tube defects. Due to its involvement in a number of cellular processes, its role in other pregnancy outcomes such as miscarriage, recurrent miscarriage, low birth weight, preterm birth (PTB), preeclampsia, abruptio placentae, and stillbirth has been investigated. PTB is a leading cause of perinatal mortality and morbidity; therefore its association with FA supplementation is of major interest. The analysis of a small number of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) has not found a beneficial role of FA in reducing the rate of PTBs. Aim of the Study. The aim of this review was to examine the results from recent observational studies about the effect of FA supplementation on PTB. Materials and Methods. We carried out a search on Medline and by manual search of the observational studies from 2009 onwards that analyzed the rate of PTB in patients who received supplementation with FA before and/or throughout pregnancy. Results. The results from recent observational studies suggest a slight reduction of PTBs that is not consistent with the results from RCTs. Further research is needed to better understand the role of FA supplementation before and during pregnancy in PTB.

1. Introduction

Folates are a group of water-soluble B vitamins naturally existing in food such as legumes, leafy green vegetables, and some fruits.

Folate in foods is naturally present in the form of reduced folate polyglutamate conjugates, while folic acid (FA) refers to the fully oxidized and most stable form of folate [1]. Due to a better bioavailability of FA, which is approximately 70% higher than that of folate, this is the synthetic form often used in supplements and in fortified foods [2].

Under fasting conditions, the bioavailability of FA approaches 100% reducing to about 85% when consumed with food [3], while for food folates it is estimated to be around 50% (60–90% for some fruits and vegetables) [4].

This group of vitamins acts as substrates and cofactors in many cellular pathways and biological reactions like DNA and RNA synthesis, cell replication, intracellular signalling, and gene programming through methylation, among the others.

All these processes are implicated in fetal and placental growth and development; therefore the embryonic tissues are sensitive to the presence of folates deficit or metabolic alterations [5, 6].

In particular, methylation is the target of recent researches due to the suggested role of folates in epigenetic changes that would modify the individual response to diseases later in life [7].

Supplementation with FA would therefore lead to different and more widespread effects during specific critical developmental windows in pregnancy, as demethylation and subsequent remethylation occur in the early embryo [8].

Recommended dietary allowances for folate, expressed as dietary folate equivalents (DFE)—which takes into account the higher bioavailability of synthetic FA compared to naturally occurring folate in food—are 400 μg DFE/day in males and females over 19 y and 600 μg DFE/day for pregnant women [3, 9].

Normal values (NV) of folates can be assessed in different ways. Red blood cells (RBC) folate concentration (NV > 316 nmol/L (140 ng/mL)) is defined as a primary indicator of folate status because of its correlation with liver folate and consequent tissue stores [10]. Other indicators of folate status are serum folate (NV > 6.8 nmol/L (3 ng/mL)) and homocysteine (NV < 14 μmol/L) [6].

The pharmacokinetics of FA shows a linear increase in the steady-state concentration of serum folate levels for increasing dose, when supplemented doses are administered [11].

Wald and collaborators indicate that serum folate concentrations increase by 0.94 ng/mL (95% CI 0.77–1.10) for every 0.1 mg/day increase of FA intake in women aged 20–35 years [12]. In addition to that, the absorption of FA is similar whether it is administered in the morning or evening, showing no circadian variation [13].

In literature an estimated mean adherence rate of 55% among pregnant women taking prenatal multivitamins is reported [14]; thus a higher FA supplementation could better maintain the serum folate concentrations. For example, the estimated steady-state serum folate levels produced by 5 mg FA would remain above 7 ng/mL, even with 24% of pills taken [11].

However, the mean time to reach a RBC concentration of folate >906 nmol/L seems to be 4.2 ± 3.5 weeks even with a supplementation of 0.8 mg of FA [15]. In another study plasmatic levels of folates reached the plateau level after 3 months of supplementation with an increase in serum folate by 80% in the first month with all doses (100 μg/die, 400 μg/die, 4000 μg/die, 4000 μg/week) [16].

Despite the unequivocal success of FA in reducing neural tube defects (NTDs) rates [1719], concerns have been raised about the potential adverse effects of exposure to unmetabolized FA resulting from FA intakes that overwhelm the liver metabolic capacity [20].

However, according to recent researches some compensatory mechanisms exist to limit this exposure: a high dose (5 mg) of FA roughly doubles the median plasma concentration of unmetabolized FA over the first 12 weeks of supplementation, but a significant decline is observed thereafter, despite ongoing supplementation and sustained total folate concentrations [21].

In addition to that, plasma concentration of unmetabolized FA does not appear significantly different between groups exposed to 1.1 mg and 5 mg, respectively [11].

For security concerns also unmetabolized FA concentration in cord blood has been investigated and it seems that, in the majority of pregnant women, FA supplied is not likely to accumulate in the fetus [20, 22].

In pregnancy an increase of folate breakdown products has been observed, in line with the extra demand due to the rapidly growing placenta and fetus [23, 24] suggesting a possible relation of folate status in the mother on fetal growth [25]. Also, folates are required for the metabolism of homocysteine, whose level is associated with pregnancy complications, such as miscarriage, placental abruption, and hypertension disorders [2629].

A relevant scientific literature supports the role of FA in protecting against both the first occurrence [17, 18] and the recurrence [19, 30] of NTDs when used in the periconceptional period. For this reason expert committees worldwide have issued recommendations about supplementation with 0.4–1 mg of FA, or 4-5 mg if at higher risk of having a baby with NTD [19, 3134], and some countries adopted a policy of food fortification with FA [35].

In the Cochrane review of De-Regil et al., the issue of different doses, forms and schemes of folate supplementation in the studies available is reported. In this review it is confirmed that periconceptional (started before conception and continued until 12 weeks of gestational age) FA supplementation prevents NTDs, but there were insufficient data to evaluate the effects on other outcomes such as congenital cardiovascular defects, cleft lip and palate, miscarriages, or any other birth defects [36].

Among the other outcomes, the rate of preterm birth (PTB), which indicates birth before 37 weeks of gestational age, has a major interest being a leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality with a frequency of about 12-13% births in the USA and 5–9% in many other developed countries. These premature births are both medically induced for maternal or fetal complications (such as preeclampsia or eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction) and spontaneous [37].

The survival chances of the 15 million babies born preterm each year vary dramatically depending on where they are born. South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa account for half the world’s births, more than 60% of the world’s preterm babies and over 80% of the world’s 1.1 million deaths due to preterm birth complications [38].

There are some hypotheses that could link reduced blood folate and prematurity.

First, periconception FA supplementation may influence early placentation processes [39]. In fact FA is potentially important in a number of crucial early stages of placental development, including extravillous trophoblast invasion, angiogenesis, and secretion of matrix metalloproteinases [40].

The role of FA in placentation could be supported also by the observation that increased homocysteine levels (on which folates have a lowering effect [41, 42]) induce cytotoxic and oxidative stress on placental vascular and endothelial functions [4345] and exposure of trophoblast cells to homocysteine may increase apoptosis [46]. Periconceptional supplementation may therefore be beneficial in preventing pregnancy disorders associated with deficient placental development that could lead to PTB [4751].

Second, micronutrient status at the time of implantation could have a role in inflammation. In fact early PTB is often caused by intrauterine infection and according to some studies FA is reduced in PTB [52, 53].

However, the serum levels of homocysteine or FA measured in patients with preterm premature rupture of membrane, an important cause of preterm delivery, do not differ from those in matched control women [54, 55].

At last, recent findings have also shown an association between polymorphisms in folate metabolizing genes and the risk of spontaneous PTB [56].

The impact of PTB justifies the ongoing research on all possible preventive methods and, on this basis, the effects of supplementation with FA on prematurity have been recently investigated.

The Cochrane review of Lassi and collaborators [57] had the aim to assess the effect of FA supplementation alone taken during pregnancy on haematological and biochemical parameters and adverse events. Only 3 out of the 31 trials included considered PTB among the outcomes, though with different definitions (birth before 38 weeks of gestational age in 2 trials [58, 59]), and found that FA supplementation (from 200 mcg to 5 mg) during pregnancy (started after conception and continued until 30 weeks [60], administered before 26 weeks [58], started at 24 weeks and continued to delivery [59]) had no impact on PTB (2,959 patients, RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.73–1.38).

Fekete et al. [61] investigated the effect of FA supplementation (from 0.25 mg to 5 mg) started in the second trimester and assessed the dose-response relationship between folate intake and birth weight, placental weight, and length of gestation. Data from 5 RCTs involving 380 participants were analyzed. These studies reported a period of supplementation of 12–24 weeks and folate intake both from supplements or fortified foods and natural food source, often compared to the use of iron alone. No beneficial effect of folate supplementation on length of gestation was found.

Chiaffarino et al. [62] reviewed both RCTs and observational studies to investigate the effects of FA supplementation ranging from 200 mcg to 5 mg on pregnancy outcomes. In the majority of RCTs reported in this review, FA supplementation was started after conception (ranging from the first consultation in pregnancy to the 30th week of gestational age). The 3 observational studies reported were heterogeneous as they related the effects of different situations (preconceptional supplementation, FA intake in pregnancy, and homocisteine level in pregnancy) to PTB. The conclusion was that FA supplementation in different periods of pregnancy had no impact on the reduction of PTB according to RCTs while the analysis of the observational studies showed a potential beneficial role of FA.

2. Aim of the Study

The aim of our review is to update the findings of recent observational studies that investigated the effect of FA supplementation on PTB with interest in differentiating the period of use (periconceptional and postconceptional) and when available the outcome of spontaneous PTB.

3. Materials and Method

Medline database was searched using the keywords “folic acid,” “preterm,” “preterm delivery,” “prematurity,” “supplementation,” and “periconceptional” from 2009 onwards.

Reviews were excluded from this analysis and also non-English written observational studies. Only studies focusing mainly on FA supplementation and in singleton, low risk pregnancies were included. Studies that evaluated the outcome of PTB according to folate or homocysteine concentration in blood or serum were also excluded.

Finally, 7 papers were included.

The term PTB always refers to births that occurred before 37 weeks of pregnancy.

The studies evaluated were heterogeneous for the use of FA (alone or with multivitamins), the dose of FA and the beginning and the period of supplementation.

The characteristics and the results of the studies are indicated in Table 1.

tab1
Table 1: Dose, period, and effect of FA supplementation on PTB in recent observational studies.

4. Results

Our review has found that there is not any agreement among the results of the studies taken into the analysis.

The study of Papadopoulou [63] suggests a decrease of PTB in women supplemented with 5 mg of FA in early-midpregnancy. This result is confirmed also in a large cohort (38,151 women) [64] that used a similar dose of FA in the periconceptional period, but not in the “Generation R study” [65].

The use of FA in the second and third trimesters appears to be more protective against PTB than in the preconceptional period in a large cohort of patients that received supplementation in a fortification policy country (US) [66]. Differently, Alwan et al. reported an increased risk of PTB in a population with a later beginning of supplementation, especially if extended beyond the first and second trimesters of pregnancy. The authors report that it cannot be ruled out that residual confounding may be contributing to this apparent association as there may be unmeasured confounders resulting in the apparent negative relationship between multivitamin supplement taking in the third trimester and PTB [67].

Regarding the dose, more than 5 mg do not seem to increase the beneficial effect observed [63], while the length of supplementation (more than 1 year preconception and until the end of the first trimester) reduced the rate of PTB before 32 weeks of gestational age in a cohort of 34,480 women even if in this study the supplementation could include multivitamins [68].

Catov et al. [69] agree with the beneficial effect of multivitamins with FA (but not of FA alone) only in a subgroup of patients (nonobese women), while in overweight patients this effect was not observed.

The start of supplementation is an important issue as administration of FA before or after conception could have different effects due to its action on different targets.

Among the studies reported, the ones of Bukowski, Catov, and Timmermans evaluate the effect of FA given before conception on PTB, while the others report its use after that. Apparently, there is not any strong difference in the outcome.

Last, some studies report the effect of FA on the total number of PTB. However, differentiation between PTB due to spontaneous birth rather than to active interventions for maternal or fetal complications is an issue of relevant importance.

In our analysis there are some limitations due to the differences among these studies in terms of dose of FA, pre- or postconceptional beginning and end of supplementation, use of multivitamins, length of supplementation, and gestational age at which the supplementation was started if postconceptional.

A strong limitation of observational studies design is the possibility that relevant confounders have not been accounted for. Thus it is conceivable that folate supplementation could be a marker of healthy behavior. Also, the use of questionnaires based on women self-report use of FA or multivitamins could lead to the collection of questionable data and it is associated with recall bias. Comorbidities in the studied populations are not precisely described as well.

Instead, RCTs are the most rigorous way of determining whether a cause-effect relation exists between treatment and outcome and for assessing the cost effectiveness of a treatment. They have several important features such as random allocation to intervention groups, patients, and trialists unaware of the treatment given until the end of the study, identical treatment for all intervention groups (except for the experimental treatment), analysis of patients within the group to which they are allocated, irrespective of whether they experience the intended intervention (intention to treat analysis), and finally the analysis is focused on estimating the size of the difference in predefined outcomes between intervention groups.

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, our analysis shows that the results from the observational studies evaluated are conflicting, although a trend of PTB reduction in subgroups with definite features has been noted. These results are not entirely consistent with the ones derived from previous RCTs.

The impact of PTB on perinatal morbidity and mortality and the uncertain effect of FA supplementation on this condition require the development of well-designed and adequate sample size RCTs on this topic which examine the effect of preconceptional and postconceptional supplementation and differentiate the outcome in spontaneous and iatrogenic PTB.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. M. Lucock, “Folic acid: nutritional biochemistry, molecular biology, and role in disease processes,” Molecular Genetics and Metabolism, vol. 71, no. 1-2, pp. 121–138, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. H. McNulty and K. Pentieva, “Folate bioavailability,” Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 529–536, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Food and Nutrition Board and Institute of Medicine, “Folate,” in Dietary Reference Intakes for Thiamin, Riboflavin, Niacin, Vitamin B6, Folate, Vitamin B12, Pantothenic Acid, Biotin, and Choline, pp. 196–305, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA, 1998.
  4. J. F. Gregory III, “Case study: folate bioavailability,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 131, supplement 4, pp. 1376S–1382S, 2001. View at Scopus
  5. T. Tamura and M. F. Picciano, “Folate and human reproduction,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 993–1016, 2006. View at Scopus
  6. L. B. Bailey and J. F. Gregory III, “Folate metabolism and requirements,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 779–782, 1999. View at Scopus
  7. K. S. Crider, A. M. Cordero, Y. P. Qi, J. Mulinare, N. F. Dowling, and R. J. Berry, “Prenatal folic acid and risk of asthma in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 98, pp. 1272–1281, 2013.
  8. K. S. Crider, T. P. Yang, R. J. Berry, and L. B. Bailey, “Folate and DNA methylation: a review of molecular mechanisms and the evidence for folate's role,” in Advances in Nutrition, vol. 3, pp. 21–38, 2012.
  9. Institute of Medicine and Committee (IOM), Dietary Reference Intake: Folate, Other B Vitamins and Choline, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA, 1998.
  10. A. Wu, I. Chanarin, G. Slavin, and A. J. Levi, “Folate deficiency in the alcoholic—its relationship to clinical and haematological abnormalities, liver disease and folate stores,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 469–478, 1975. View at Scopus
  11. P. Nguyen, R. Boskovic, P. Yazdani, B. Kapur, H. Vandenberghe, and G. Koren, “Comparing folic acid pharmacokinetics among women of childbearing age: single dose ingestion of 1.1 versus 5 MG folic acid,” The Canadian Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. e314–e322, 2008. View at Scopus
  12. N. J. Wald, M. R. Law, J. K. Morris, and D. S. Wald, “Quantifying the effect of folic acid,” The Lancet, vol. 15, pp. 2069–2073, 2001, Erratum in The Lancet, vol. 359, no. 9306, p. 630, 2002.
  13. E. Ahn, B. Kapur, and G. Koren, “Study on circadian variation in folate pharmacokinetics,” Canadian Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. e4–e9, 2005. View at Scopus
  14. P. Nguyen, A. Nava-Ocampo, A. Levy et al., “Effect of iron content on the tolerability of prenatal multivitamins in pregnancy,” BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, vol. 15, pp. 8–17, 2008.
  15. S. Bramswig, R. Prinz-Langenohl, Y. Lamers et al., “Supplementation with a multivitamin containing 800 µg of folic acid shortens the time to reach the preventive red blood cell folate concentration in healthy women,” International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 61–70, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. L. Hao, Q.-H. Yang, Z. Li et al., “Folate status and homocysteine response to folic acid doses and withdrawal among young Chinese women in a large-scale randomized double-blind trial,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 448–457, 2008. View at Scopus
  17. A. E. Czeizel and I. Dudas, “Prevention of the first occurrence of neural-tube defects by periconceptional vitamin supplementation,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 327, no. 26, pp. 1832–1835, 1992. View at Scopus
  18. R. J. Berry, Z. Li, J. D. Erickson et al., “Prevention of neural-tube defects with folic acid in China,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 341, no. 20, pp. 1485–1490, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. N. Wald, J. Sneddon, J. Densem, C. Frost, and R. Stone, “Prevention of neural tube defects: results of the medical research council vitamin study,” The Lancet, vol. 338, no. 8760, pp. 131–137, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. Obeid, M. Kasoha, S. H. Kirsch, W. Munz, and W. Herrmann, “Concentrations of unmetabolized folic acid and primary folate forms in pregnant women at delivery and in umbilical cord blood,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 1416–1422, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C. Tam, D. O'Connor, and G. Koren, “Circulating unmetabolized Folic Acid: relationship to folate status and effect of supplementation,” Obstetrics and Gynecology International, vol. 2012, Article ID 485179, 17 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. M. R. Sweeney, J. McPartlin, D. G. Weir et al., “Evidence of unmetabolised folic acid and cord blood of newborn and serum of 4-day-old infants,” British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 727–730, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. Scott, “Catabolism of folates,” in Folates and Pterins: Chemistry and BioChemistry of Folates, R. L. Blakley and S. J. Bankovic, Eds., vol. 1, pp. 307–327, John Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 1984.
  24. J. McPartlin, A. Halligan, J. M. Scott, M. Darling, and D. G. Weir, “Accelerated folate breakdown in pregnancy,” The Lancet, vol. 341, no. 8838, pp. 148–149, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. Rolschau, J. Date, and K. Kristoffersen, “Folic acid supplement and intrauterine growth,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 343–346, 1979. View at Scopus
  26. W. L. D. M. Nelen, H. J. Blom, E. A. P. Steegers, M. Den Heijer, and T. K. A. B. Eskes, “Hyperhomocysteinemia and recurrent early pregnancy loss: a meta-analysis,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 1196–1199, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. Tikkanen, “Placental abruption: epidemiology, risk factors and consequences,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 140–149, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. R. P. Steegers-Theunissen, C. A. Van Iersel, P. G. Peer, W. L. Nelen, and E. A. Steegers, “Hyperhomocysteinemia, pregnancy complications, and the timing of investigation,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 336–343, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A. M. Cotter, A. M. Molloy, J. M. Scott, and S. F. Daly, “Elevated plasma homocysteine in early pregnancy: a risk factor for the development of severe preeclampsia,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 185, no. 4, pp. 781–785, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. R. W. Smithells, S. Sheppard, J. Wild, and C. J. Schorah, “Prevention of neural tube defect recurrences in Yorkshire: final report,” The Lancet, vol. 2, no. 8661, pp. 498–499, 1989. View at Scopus
  31. R. D. Wilson, J.-A. Johnson, P. Wyatt, et al., “Pre-conceptional vitamin/folic acid supplementation 2007: the use of folic acid in combination with a multivitamin supplement for the prevention of neural tube defects and other congenital anomalies,” Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 1003–1026, 2007. View at Scopus
  32. United States Preventive Services Task Force, “Folic acid for the precention of neural tube defects: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 150, no. 9, pp. 626–631, 2009.
  33. World Health Organization, “Prevention of neural tube defects. Standards for maternal and neonatal care,” 2006, http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/a91272/en/.
  34. J. R. Bale, B. J. Stoll, and A. O. Lucas, IOM 2003 Reducing Birth Defects: Meeting the Challenge in the Developing World, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2003.
  35. “Food standards: amendment of standards of identity for enriched grain products to require addition of folic acid. Final rule. 21 CFR Parts 136, 137, and 139,” Federal Register, vol. 61, pp. 8781–87897, 1996.
  36. L. M. De-Regil, A. C. Fernández-Gaxiola, T. Dowswell, and J. P. Peña-Rosas, “Effects and safety of periconceptional folate supplementation for preventing birth defects,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 10, Article ID CD007950, 2010. View at Scopus
  37. R. L. Goldenberg, J. F. Culhane, J. D. Iams, and R. Romero, “Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth,” The Lancet, vol. 371, no. 9606, pp. 75–84, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. March of Dimes, The Partnership of Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health, Save the Children; World Health Organization, Born Too Soon: the Global Action Report on Preterm Birth, Geneva, Switzerland, 2012.
  39. S. Timmermans, V. W. V. Jaddoe, L. M. Silva et al., “Folic acid is positively associated with uteroplacental vascular resistance: the Generation R Study,” Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 54–61, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. P. J. Williams, J. N. Bulmer, B. A. Innes, and F. B. Pipkin, “Possible roles for folic acid in the regulation of trophoblast invasion and placental development in normal early human pregnancy,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 84, no. 6, pp. 1148–1153, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. F. Parazzini, F. Chiaffarino, E. Ricci, L. Improta, and G. Monni, “Homocysteine, red cell, and plasma folate concentrations and birth weight in Italian women: results from a prospective study,” Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 427–431, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. R. Clarke, “Lowering blood homocysteine with folic acid-based supplements: meta-analysis of randomised trials,” Indian Heart Journal, vol. 52, supplement 7, pp. S59–S64, 2000.
  43. E. A. P. Steegers, P. Von Dadelszen, J. J. Duvekot, and R. Pijnenborg, “Pre-eclampsia,” The Lancet, vol. 376, no. 9741, pp. 631–644, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. R. P. M. Steegers-Theunissen and E. A. P. Steegers, “Nutrient-gene interactions in early pregnancy: a vascular hypothesis,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 115–117, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. N. H. van Mil, A. M. Oosterbaan, and R. P. M. Steegers-Theunissen, “Teratogenicity and underlying mechanisms of homocysteine in animal models: a review,” Reproductive Toxicology, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 520–531, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. N. Di Simone, N. Maggiano, D. Caliandro et al., “Homocysteine induces trophoblast cell death with apoptotic features,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 1129–1134, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. T. Yamada, M. Morikawa, T. Yamada et al., “First-trimester serum folate levels and subsequent risk of abortion and preterm birth among Japanese women with singleton pregnancies,” Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 287, no. 1, pp. 9–14, 2013.
  48. M. Dhobale, P. Chavan, A. Kulkarni, S. Mehendale, H. Pisal, and S. Joshi, “Reduced folate, increased vitamin B(12) and homocysteine concentrations in women delivering preterm,” Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, vol. 61, pp. 7–14, 2012.
  49. N. E. Bergen, V. W. V. Jaddoe, S. Timmermans et al., “Homocysteine and folate concentrations in early pregnancy and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: the generation R study,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 119, no. 6, pp. 739–751, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. F. Arias, L. Rodriquez, S. C. Rayne, and F. T. Kraus, “Maternal placental vasculopathy and infection: two distinct subgroups among patients with preterm labor and preterm ruptured membranes,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 168, no. 2, pp. 585–591, 1993. View at Scopus
  51. S. E. Vollset, H. Refsum, L. M. Irgens et al., “Plasma total homocysteine, pregnancy complications, and adverse pregnancy outcomes: the Hordaland Homocysteine Study,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 962–968, 2000. View at Scopus
  52. R. L. Goldenberg, J. C. Hauth, and W. W. Andrews, “Intrauterine infection and preterm delivery,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 342, no. 20, pp. 1500–1507, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. K. B. Holven, P. Aukrust, T. Holm, L. Ose, and M. S. Nenseter, “Folic acid treatment reduces chemokine release from peripheral blood mononuclear cells in hyperhomocysteinemic subjects,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 699–703, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. S. E. Ferguson, G. N. Smith, M. E. Salenieks, R. Windrim, and M. C. Walker, “Preterm premature rupture of membranes: nutritional and socioeconomic factors,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 100, no. 6, pp. 1250–1256, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. E. J. Knudtson, K. Smith, B. M. Mercer et al., “Serum homocysteine levels after preterm premature rupture of the membranes,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 191, no. 2, pp. 537–541, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. W. G. Johnson, T. O. Scholl, J. R. Spychala, S. Buyske, E. S. Stenroos, and X. Chen, “Common dihydrofolate reductase 19-base pair deletion allele: a novel risk factor for preterm delivery,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 664–668, 2005. View at Scopus
  57. Z. S. Lassi, R. A. Salam, B. A. Haider, and Z. A. Bhutta, “Folic acid supplementation during pregnancy for maternal health and pregnancy outcomes,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 28, no. 3, 2013.
  58. A. F. Fleming, J. P. Hendrickse, and N. C. Allan, “The prevention of megaloblastic anaemia in pregnancy in Nigeria,” The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Commonwealth, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 425–432, 1968. View at Scopus
  59. I. Blot, E. Papiernik, and J. P. Kaltwasser, “Influence of routine administration of folic acid and iron during pregnancy,” Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 294–304, 1981. View at Scopus
  60. D. H. M. Charles, A. R. Ness, D. Campbell, G. D. Smith, E. Whitley, and M. H. Hall, “Folic acid supplements in pregnancy and birth outcome: re-analysis of a large randomised controlled trial and update of Cochrane review,” Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 112–124, 2005. View at Scopus
  61. K. Fekete, C. Berti, M. Trovato et al., “Effect of folate intake on health outcomes in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis on birth weight, placental weight and length of gestation,” Nutrition Journal, vol. 11, no. 75, 2012.
  62. F. Chiaffarino, G. B. Ascone, R. Bortolus et al., “Effects of folic acid supplementation on pregnancy outcomes: a review of randomized clinical trials,” Minerva Ginecologica, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 293–301, 2010. View at Scopus
  63. E. Papadopoulou, N. Stratakis, T. Roumeliotaki et al., “The effect of high doses of folic acid and iron supplementation in early-to-mid pregnancy on prematurity and fetal growth retardation: the mother-child cohort study in Crete, Greece (Rhea study),” European Journal of Nutrition, vol. 52, pp. 327–336, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. A. E. Czeizel, E. H. Puhó, Z. Langmar, N. Acs, and F. Bánhidy, “Possible association of folic acid supplementation during pregnancy with reduction of preterm birth: a population-based study,” The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 148, pp. 135–140, 2010.
  65. S. Timmermans, V. W. V. Jaddoe, A. Hofman, R. P. M. Steegers-Theunissen, and E. A. P. Steegers, “Periconception folic acid supplementation, fetal growth and the risks of low birth weight and preterm birth: The Generation R Study,” British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 102, no. 5, pp. 777–785, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. G. M. Shaw, S. L. Carmichael, W. Yang, and A. M. Siega-Riz, “Periconceptional intake of folic acid and food folate and risks of preterm delivery,” American Journal of Perinatology, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 747–751, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. N. Alwan, D. Greenwood, N. Simpson, H. McArdle, and J. Cade, “The relationship between dietary supplement use in late pregnancy and birth outcomes: a cohort study in British women,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 117, no. 7, pp. 821–829, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. R. Bukowski, F. D. Malone, F. T. Porter et al., “Preconceptional folate supplementation and the risk of spontaneous preterm birth: a cohort study,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 6, no. 5, Article ID e1000061, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. J. M. Catov, L. M. Bodnar, J. Olsen, S. Olsen, and E. A. Nohr, “Periconceptional multivitamin use and risk of preterm or small-for-gestational-age Births in the Danish National birth cohort,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 906–912, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus