BioMed Research International / 2014 / Article / Tab 3 / Research Article
Structural Comparison, Substrate Specificity, and Inhibitor Binding of AGPase Small Subunit from Monocot and Dicot: Present Insight and Future Potential Table 3 Secondary structure statistics of AGPase SS predicted by CONCORD and domain position.
AGPase Helix (%) Strand (%) Coil (%) Domain position Template (Solanum tuberosum ) 70 (13.44) 116 (22.26) 335 (64.30) 93–351, 389–515
MONOCOT Oryza sativa ssp. japonica 67 (13.03) 117 (22.76) 330 (64.20) 86–344, 382–507 Hordeum vulgare 68 (13.25) 113 (22.02) 332 (64.71) 85–343, 381–506 Triticum aestivum 66 (13.95) 112 (23.67) 295 (62.36) 45–303, 341–466 DICOT Arabidopsis thaliana 69 (13.26) 115 (22.11) 336 (64.61) 101–350, 388–514 Solanum lycopersicum 71 (13.62) 117 (22.45) 333 (63.91) 93–351, 389–515 Beta vulgaris 66 (13.49) 106 (21.67) 317 (64.82) 73–331, 369–483 Vicia faba 1 71 (13.97) 118 (23.22) 319 (62.79) 80–338, 376–502 Vicia faba 2 68 (13.28) 115 (22.46) 329 (64.25) 84–342, 380–506 Cicer arietinum 1 70 (13.56) 116 (22.48) 330 (63.95) 88–346, 384–510 Cicer arietinum 2 67 (13.26) 117 (23.16) 321 (63.56) 77–335, 373–499 Brassica napus 71 (13.65) 114 (21.92) 335 (64.42) 92–350, 388–514