Clinical Study

Hormonal Contraceptive Use and the Prevalence of Endometriotic Lesions at Different Regions within the Peritoneal Cavity

Table 1

The incidence and mean age of patients with endometriotic lesions at defined locations in both the current HC use or non-HC use groups.

(%)Age
AllNo HCHC

All women1618873
 Age32.56 ± 0.4634.14 ± 0.6030.66 ± 0.66 0.00011
Absence versus presence
 Peritoneal 11031.67 ± 0.55 ( )33.43 ± 0.70 ( )29.49 ± 0.79 ( )0.00031
 RVS5833.28 ± 0.71 ( )34.30 ± 0.93 ( )32.18 ± 1.105 ( )0.13401
 Ovarian8933.12 ± 0.56 ( )34.09 ± 0.72 ( )31.41 ± 1.15 ( )0.02181
value
Single region81/161 (50.3)32.47 ± 0.85 ( )
 Peritoneal 37/161 (23.0)29.97 ± 1.07 ( )33.36 ± 1.71 ( )27.91 ± 1.20 ( )0.01141
 RVS22/161 (13.7)34.4 ± 1.2 ( )36.09 ± 1.55 ( )32.73 ± 1.81 ( )0.17361
 Ovarian22/161 (13.7)34.73 ± 1.3 ( )35.50 ± 1.64 ( )32.67 ± 2.03 ( )0.35071
 Single location ( value)
Multiple regions80/161 (49.7)32.65 ± 0.58 ( )
 Peritoneal and ovarian42/161 (26.1)32.88 ± 0.80 ( )33.96 ± 0.99 ( )30.93 ± 1.22 ( )0.06801
 Peritoneal and RVS14/161 (8.7)32.57 ± 1.67 ( )32.83 ± 3.14 ( )32.38 ± 1.95 ( )0.89851
 RVS and ovarian3/161 (1.9)33.67 ± 4.41 ( )33.67 ± 4.41 ( )
 Peritoneal, ovarian, & RVS21/161 (13.0)32.10 ± 0.94 ( )32.71 ± 1.14 ( )30.86 ± 1.70 ( )0.36681
 Multiple location ( value)
Single versus multiple ( value)

Comparison of the mean age between HC users and non-HC users, as well as between the single and the multiple regions, was performed by a Student’s -test. 2Comparison of the mean age between women with lesions in different locations, as well as for both the single and multiple regions, was performed by a one-way ANOVA test with a post-hoc Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test.