About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
BioMed Research International
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 596746, 2 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/596746
Editorial

Current Advances in Molecular Phylogenetics

1Institute for Information Transmission Problems (Kharkevich Institute), Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 127994, Russia
2Yale-NUS College & National University of Singapore, Singapore
3Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn, Germany

Received 22 December 2013; Accepted 22 December 2013; Published 7 April 2014

Copyright © 2014 Vassily Lyubetsky et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. W. M. Fitch, “Uses for evolutionary trees,” Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society of London B, vol. 349, no. 1327, pp. 93–102, 1995. View at Scopus
  2. H. Ellegren, “Comparative genomics and the study of evolution by natural selection,” Molecular Ecology, vol. 17, no. 21, pp. 4586–4596, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. C. O. Webb, D. D. Ackerly, M. A. McPeek, and M. J. Donoghue, “Phylogenies and community ecology,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 475–505, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. C. Stearns, “Evolutionary medicine: its scope, interest and potential,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B, vol. 279, pp. 4305–4321, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. K. A. Crandall, O. R. R. Bininda-Emonds, G. M. Mace, and R. K. Wayne, “Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 290–295, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. P. H. Harvey, A. J. Leigh Brown, J. Maynard Smith, and S. Nee, Eds., New Uses for New Phylogenies, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1996.
  7. R. D. Gray, S. J. Greenhill, and R. M. Ross, “The pleasures and perils of darwinizing culture (with phylogenies),” Biological Theory, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 360–375, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. M. J. Sanderson, B. G. Baldwin, G. Bharathan et al., “The growth of phylogenetic information and the need for a phylogenetic data base,” Systematic Biology, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 562–568, 1993. View at Scopus
  9. M. Pagel, “Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies,” Zoologica Scripta, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 331–348, 1997. View at Scopus
  10. D. Sheehan, “Next-generation genome sequencing makes non-model organisms increasingly accessible for proteomic studies: some implications for ecotoxicology,” Journal of Proteomics and Bioinformatics, vol. 6, no. 1, Article ID 10000e21, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. C. X. Chan and M. A. Ragan, “Next-generation phylogenomics,” Biology Direct, vol. 8, article 3, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar