About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
BioMed Research International
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 610103, 6 pages
Review Article

Safety of Nicergoline as an Agent for Management of Cognitive Function Disorders

Section of Sleep Research and Pharmacopsychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel, 1090 Vienna, Austria

Received 13 March 2014; Revised 4 August 2014; Accepted 12 August 2014; Published 28 August 2014

Academic Editor: Rui Liu

Copyright © 2014 Bernd Saletu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Nicergoline is a semisynthetic ergot derivative and has a selective alpha-1A adrenergic receptor blocking property and also other additional mechanisms of actions, both in the brain and in the periphery. It is in clinical use for over three decades in over fifty countries for conditions such as cerebral infarction, acute and chronic peripheral circulation disorders, vascular dementia, and Alzheimer’s disease and has been found to be beneficial in a variety of other conditions. However, concerns about its safety have been raised, especially after the European medicines agency’s (EMEA’s) restriction in the use of all ergot derivatives including nicergoline. But, most of the available literature and data suggest that the adverse events with nicergoline are mild and transient. Further, none of the available treatment options for cognitive disorders afford definitive resolution of symptoms. In this backdrop, we discuss the pharmacology of nicergoline with special emphasis on the safety of this compound, especially when used in patients suffering from cognitive function disorders.

1. Introduction

Cognitive function disorders (CFDs) are a group of disorders characterized by disruption in one or more of the cognitive domains. Diagnostic Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5), addresses CFDs as major neurocognitive disorder, which includes three groups of disorders, namely, delirium, dementia, and amnestic disorders [1]. All these three are characterized by an impairment in cognition (as in memory, language, or attention) [2].

Dementia has been estimated to affect about 6.1% of the world’s population aged over 65 years. It has been predicted that there might be a considerable worldwide increase in the prevalence of dementia from 25 million in the year 2000 to 63 million in 2030 [3]. It is a clinical condition characterized by global impairment in cognitive function and is usually progressive impairment of cognitive functions. These functions include memory, judgement, reasoning, perception, and personality impairments. This leads to difficulties in daily life and to inappropriate behaviour. These symptoms are seen most often caused by Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and ischemic damage to brain [4].

The management of AD is a multidisciplinary challenge, as currently only supportive treatment is available. Symptomatic pharmacological intervention is aimed at the treatment of the cognitive (cholinesterase inhibitors) and behavioural symptoms (psychotropic drugs) [3]. Amongst the cholinesterase inhibitors, donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine, and tacrine are the drugs presently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [5]. Tacrine is no longer prescribed due to concerns of hepatotoxicity and unfavourable frequency of administration (4 times a day) [6]. Memantine is a useful psychotropic drug for AD, especially for moderate-to-severe disease but with little proven benefit in mild disease [7, 8]. However, each of these drugs has only modest efficacy for AD. Moreover, the controversy surrounding the usefulness of these antidementia medications is quite profound, especially as these agents slow the progression of cognitive decline but do not reverse the effects of the disease in AD [9].

The adverse events (AEs) reported with these drugs are mild and self-limiting. The anticholinesterases are associated to variable degrees with gastrointestinal effects, sleep disturbances, muscle cramps, weakness, bradycardia, and urinary incontinence, whereas memantine is associated with dizziness, confusion, headache, and incontinence [10].

For vascular dementia, treatment is largely symptomatic, and various agents reported to have modest efficacy include nicergoline, piracetam, oxiracetam, citicoline, pentoxifylline, propentofylline, aspirin, triflusal, and Ginkgo biloba [11].

Nicergoline, chemically 8-beta-(5-bromonicotinoylhydroxymethyl)-1,6-dimethyl-10alpha-metoxyergoline (Figure 1), is a semisynthetic ergot derivative which is registered in over fifty countries and in use for more than three decades for the treatment of cognitive, affective, and behavioural disorders in the elderly. Despite this status, concerns regarding the safety of nicergoline have been raised, as it is an ergot derivative [4].

Figure 1: Structure of nicergoline and its metabolism into MMDL and MDL. The hydrolysis is catalysed by CYP2D6 [12].

The European medicines agency’s (EMEA’s) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) in its recommendations suggested that ergot containing medicines, including nicergoline, should no longer be used to treat conditions due to vascular aetiology (such as peripheral artery disease, Raynaud’s syndrome, and retinopathies of vascular origin), in the prevention of migraine headaches or in the symptomatic treatment of venolymphatic insufficiency. This recommendation has been supported by the EMEA as ergot derivatives have a high likelihood of causing serious adverse events (SAEs) such as fibrosis and ergotism [12, 13]. However, in the same recommendations, it is suggested that healthcare professionals should stop prescribing ergot derivatives for the symptomatic treatment of neurosensorial impairment in the elderly, notably excluding Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias.

In the backdrop of these recommendations, and keeping in mind the dearth of efficient drugs for CFD, we plan to explore the safety of nicergoline for this indication. In this paper we have reviewed the pharmacology of nicergoline with a special emphasis on the various AEs reported when being used as an agent to treat CFDs of various origins.

2. Pharmacology

Similar to other ergot derivatives, nicergoline is a potent and selective alpha-1A adrenergic receptor antagonist [14]. In addition, nicergoline is also reported to have the following actions:(i)enhancement of catecholaminergic (noradrenaline and dopamine) turnover [15];(ii)stimulation of cholinergic neurotransmission, both by increased acetylcholine release from cholinergic nerve terminals and by selective enhancement of choline acetyltransferase enzyme [3];(iii)stimulation of phosphoinositide pathway and protein kinase C (PKC) and β translocation [3];(iv)promotion of cerebral metabolic activity resulting in increased metabolism of oxygen and glucose [16];(v)neuroprotective and antioxidant properties [17];(vi)antithrombotic activity via inhibition of platelet phospholipase, thus interfering with platelet aggregation [18, 19].

3. Rationale for Using Nicergoline in CFD

Nicergoline was initially considered to be useful in cerebrovascular disorders because of its vasoactive properties. Improvement in cerebral circulation was observed in patients with cerebrovascular disease when nicergoline was administered [20]. With the emergence of new information, a more complex pharmacological profile was proposed for nicergoline, which led to its consideration for the treatment of AD and other forms of dementia. Fioravanti and Flicker suggested that nicergoline may enhance dopaminergic and noradrenergic turnover in some areas of the brain and stimulates the phosphoinositide pathway which has been documented to be specifically impaired in AD. There is also an increase in the availability of acetylcholine by increasing its release and by inhibiting its degradation [4]. Nicergoline also increases phosphoinositide-PKC translocation, which combats beta-amyloid deposition and retards the reduction in nerve-growth factor (NGF), which may help in preventing cholinergic neuron loss [3, 4, 21]. It is also known to enhance intracellular levels of transforming-growth factor-β and glial-derived neurotrophic factor in astrocytes, two trophic factors that are known to protect neurons against β-amyloid toxicity [22, 23]. Further, nicergoline is postulated to improve vigilance and information processing at the neurophysiological level, leading to clinical improvement in degenerative and vascular dementia [24].

A definite diagnosis of advanced AD was determined by a clinical history of gradual decline in cognitive function and pathological finding of abundant NFT (neurofibrillary tangles) and SP (senile plaques) in the neocortex and medial temporal lobe. Presently, the major goal of research in AD is prevention of the disease, which entails early detection before the onset of symptoms. The concept of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), earliest clinically detectable phase of dementia and AD, has gained importance. Mild cognitive impairment is a clinical diagnosis and neuropathologic findings are just beginning to be defined. It appears now that most amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) patients are on a pathway toward AD [25].

The antiamnestic action of nicergoline was studied on passive avoidance response models such as amnesia induced by maximal electroshock in mice, scopolamine-induced amnesia in mice, and amnesia by paradoxical sleep deprivation in rats. Nicergoline demonstrates well-expressed antiamnestic effect in all these models and effect was equal to piracetam, meclofenoxate, pyritinol, deanol, and phenazepam [26]. Similar antiamnestic response to nicergoline was also obtained in the study conducted by Rakhmankulova and Voronina, displaying an equal-efficacy in comparison with piracetam and meclofenoxate [27]. According to a cochrane review, nicergoline has demonstrated a positive effect on cognition, behaviour, and clinical global impression in elderly patients with mild to moderate cognitive and behavioural impairment of various clinical origins (including chronic cerebrovascular disorders and AD) [4]. Considering the preclinical efficacy in antiamnestic activity along with neuroprotective properties of nicergoline, we cannot overlook its activity in aMCI. However, since almost all the clinical studies on nicergoline were reported long ago with no new information in the recent past, this drug has not been evaluated using current diagnostic categories. To further establish a disease modifying activity of this drug a long term double blind controlled clinical trials would be required.

4. Pharmacokinetics of Nicergoline

Nicergoline administered orally is rapidly and almost completely absorbed from the gut and is rapidly hydrolysed to an alcohol derivative, 1-methyl-10 alpha-methoxy-9,10-dihydrolysergol (MMDL), which is further N-demethylated to form 10 alpha-methoxy-9,10-dihydrolysergol (MDL). This reaction is catalysed to a major extent by CYP2D6 (Figure 1) [12, 24]. In addition, it undergoes metabolism by two minor pathways: (a) demethylation at position 1 of the ergoline nucleus; and (b) glucuronide conjugation of the free alcohols formed by the hydrolysis [28].

5. Uses of Nicergoline

Currently, where approved, nicergoline is being used as follows:(a)to improve the apathy and affective disorders caused by cerebral infarction (such as reduced mental alertness, inattention, impairment of recent memory, hypobulia, and depression);(b)in the treatment of acute and chronic peripheral circulation disorders (such as obliterative vascular disease of the limbs, Raynaud’s syndrome, and other peripheral circulation dysfunction symptoms);(c)in the treatment of vascular dementia, especially for the improvement in cognitive dysfunction and memory and to reduce the severity of this disease.In addition, studies have reported the usefulness of nicergoline in posthemodialysis pruritus [29], tinnitus and vertigo [30], and ocular conditions such as arterial obstructions, venous thrombosis, diabetic retinopathies, senile macular degenerations, papilla ischaemic oedema, central serous chorioretinopathies, and glaucoma [31]. It has also displayed efficacy in the prevention of postoperative thrombophlebitis [32], management of balance disorders of central origin, Parkinson’s disease, Leukoaraiosis, and benign prostatic hyperplasia [3]. A recent finding is that nicergoline increases serum substance P levels; this has been associated with reduction in the risk of aspiration pneumonia [33] and with improvement in dysphagia [34].

6. Concerns regarding Safety of Nicergoline

Although nicergoline has been approved for clinical use by regulatory authorities and extensively studied with respect to its efficacy and various modes of action, very limited data highlights the safety of nicergoline in subjects with cognitive decline. Long term safety of nicergoline is still best documented in comparison with placebo, and studies performed specially on patients with AD had very few subjects to be considered as absolute answers to the questions concerning the safety of use of nicergoline for this form of dementia. However, the authors of a cochrane review concluded that some evidence pointed towards an increased risk of adverse effects associated with nicergoline [4]. Further, the nicergoline cooperative study group (NCSG) reported that in comparison with placebo and ergoloid mesylates, nicergoline had a higher incidence of AEs [3]. Adverse events of nicergoline are mostly transient and minor, and are most often related to the central nervous system (CNS), the gastrointestinal system, and the cardiovascular system [3].

The NCSG reported the occurrence of CNS effects like hallucination, delusion, fatigue, and dysgeusia with nicergoline and not with either placebo or ergoloid mesylates [35]. Apart from this, nicergoline has been reported to cause diaphoresis, sleep disturbances, fainting, agitation, drowsiness, dizziness, insomnia, restlessness, flushing, and increased appetite [36, 37]. However, almost all of these latter reports are observed when nicergoline was compared with placebo. Even so, similarity in the frequency of these events between the two treatment groups was noted. All of these reactions were characterized as mild and transient did not impede continuation of treatment in all the studies reported.

A case report published in 2004 described a case of nicergoline-induced Prinzmetal angina in a 56-year-old hypertensive woman with history of right carotid endarterectomy; stoppage of nicergoline was associated with relief from the symptoms [38]. Apart from this case report, most of the cardiovascular events reported in association with nicergoline are minor and temporary and include temporary rise in BP [39], syncope [37, 40], bradycardia [40], and hypotension [40, 41]. Further, in a manner similar to the CNS adverse events, most of these cardiovascular events were seen when nicergoline was compared with placebo and did not require treatment withdrawal.

Nicergoline has been reported to cause minor gastrointestinal side effects such as heartburn [3], gastritis [37, 42], pyrosis, vomiting, diarrhoea, and abdominal pain [35]. All the other studies reported a similar frequency of gastrointestinal events with nicergoline and placebo-treated patients except the study conducted by NCSG.

Significant increase in serum uric acid levels was reported in trials; however, these patients did not require any intervention [4]. The development of gout in a previously hyperuricemic patient was reported by the NCSG in 1990, along with incidences of hyperuricemia in five patients, following therapy with nicergoline [4].

Various studies have reported other minor effects with nicergoline; these include hot flushes [37, 42], dizziness [41], inhibition of ejaculation [43], and interstitial nephritis [44]. While hot flushes can be due to the effects of nicergoline on blood vessels, inhibition of ejaculation is a known side-effect of alpha adrenergic blockers.

On the other hand, studies have reported that the tolerability of nicergoline at therapeutic doses is good [3, 41, 42, 45, 46]. In fact, no incidence of AEs was reported in almost 8 studies during the entire study duration [47, 48], though the possibility of poor methodology or data collection techniques cannot be ruled out in this study. Results from a recently published meta-analysis displayed no difference in the patient withdrawal rate between nicergoline and placebo group. Meta-analysis also displayed that the risk of any AEs was similar between nicergoline and placebo group, whereas risk of SAEs was slightly lower in nicergoline group; however, this difference was not statistically significant [48].

7. Risk of Fibrosis and Ergotism

There was a report in 1996 where four patients on nicergoline developed a syndrome of chronic pleural thickening/effusion that slowly improved after drug withdrawal. However, also mentioned in the report was that similar adverse events have never been reported earlier with nicergoline [49].

Further, with respect to ergotism, it is interesting to note that despite being an ergot derivative, there have been no reports in the literature connecting nicergoline to ergotism. The reasons for the absence of significant literature linking of nicergoline with these two important SAEs that are noted with other ergot derivatives may be two-fold. (a) The long term safety of nicergoline has not been studied; or (b) nicergoline may be devoid of a significant risk of ergotism and of fibrosis. Also of note is that almost all the clinical trials on nicergoline were published over two decades ago.

A systemic review by Fioravanti et al. has found no reference to cases with fibrosis and/or ergotism with nicergoline use [48].

In this background, clinical trials exploring the long term safety of nicergoline are warranted, especially in elderly patients with cognitive dysfunction, since not too many effective drugs are available for this diverse condition, and remains an area of unmet need. Thus, it is not a wise prospect to lose a drug for an adverse event it might not be having.

8. Drug Interactions

Nicergoline is known to potentiate the cardiodepressant effects of propranolol [50]. Since nicergoline is metabolised to a major extent by CYP2D6 [12], there are possibilities for interaction with drugs which are substrates of CYP2D6 (such as carvedilol, S-metaprolol, amitriptyline, clomipramine, haloperidol, aripiprazole, chlorpheniramine, and ondansetron), inducers (dexamethasone and rifampin) and inhibitors (bupropion, fluoxetine, quinidine, citalopram, H1-antihistaminics, metoclopramide, etc.) of CYP2D6 [51]. Drug interactions could be particularly important with nicergoline when it is used in the treatment of senile dementia since it is a condition of the elderly in whom polypharmacy is often routinely used. Appropriate clinical trials are required to investigate any significant and clinically relevant drug interactions.

Nicergoline is a strong inhibitor of platelet aggregation and decreases blood viscosity. Patients concurrently taking anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents should be closely monitored throughout the duration of therapy with nicergoline [18].

9. Conclusions

Despite concerns being raised against safety of nicergoline, a review of reported studies suggests that the drug is a safe and efficacious option in the therapeutic management of patients with dementia. The drug has not been evaluated using currently available diagnostic categories or against other therapeutic agents for dementia such as cholinesterase inhibitors or antioxidants. Even though the safety evaluations show a good tolerability profile for nicergoline, the reported adverse effects observed are self-limiting and minor. Further, none of the available treatment options for dementia offer a definitive solution to this condition. With this background, we feel that it is not wise to blindly reject a novel and useful drug such as nicergoline merely on the basis that it is an ergot derivative. We conclude that large and well-designed controlled studies using modern evaluation criteria and techniques are needed to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of nicergoline in dementia, including AD, in comparison with existing treatment options.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


  1. R. O'Hara, DSM 5 Major Changes from DSM IV: Neurocognitive Disorders, 2013, http://sgec.stanford.edu/presentations/Updates-on-Dementia/Presentation/2_Updates%20on%20Dementia.pdf.
  2. B. J. Sadock and V. A. Sadock, Kaplan & Sadock’s Synopsis of Psychiatry: Behavioral Sciences/Clinical Psychiatry, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, Md, USA, 10th edition, 2007.
  3. B. Winblad, M. Fioravanti, T. Dolezal et al., “Therapeutic use of nicergoline,” Clinical Drug Investigation, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 533–552, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Fioravanti and L. Flicker, “Efficacy of nicergoline in dementia and other age associated forms of cognitive impairment,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 4, Article ID CD003159, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. V. I. Reus, “Dementia,” in Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine, D. L. Longo, A. S. Fauci, D. L. Kasper, S. L. Hauser, J. L. Jameson, and J. Loscalzo, Eds., pp. 3429–3446, McGrawHill Medical, New York, NY, USA, 18th edition, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  6. A. Atri, “Effective pharmacological management of Alzheimer's disease,” The American Journal of Managed Care, vol. 17, supplement 13, pp. S346–S355, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. B. Reisberg, R. Doody, A. Stöffler, F. Schmitt, S. Ferris, and H. J. Möbius, “Memantine study group. Memantine in moderater -to-severe Alzheimer's disease,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 348, pp. 1333–1341, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  8. L. S. Schneider, K. S. Dagerman, J. P. T. Higgins, and R. McShane, “Lack of evidence for the efficacy of memantine in mild Alzheimer disease,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 991–998, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. N. R. Fowler, Y. F. Chen, C. A. Thurton, A. Men, E. G. Rodriguez, and J. M. Donohue, “The impact of Medicare prescription drug coverage on the use of antidementia drugs,” BMC Geriatrics, vol. 13, article 37, no. 1, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. L. Ghezzi, E. Scarpini, and D. Galimberti, “Disease-modifying drugs in Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Drug Design, Development and Therapy, vol. 7, pp. 1471–1479, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. G. C. Román, T. Erkinjuntti, A. Wallin, L. Pantoni, and H. C. Chui, “Subcortical ischaemic vascular dementia,” The Lancet Neurology, vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 426–436, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Y. Böttiger, P. Dostert, M. Strolin Benedetti et al., “Involvement of CYP2D6 but not CYP2C19 in nicergoline metabolism in humans,” The British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 707–711, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. New restrictions on use of medicines containing ergot derivatives, http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Press_release/2013/06/WC500144861.pdf.
  14. M. Alvarez-Guerra, N. Bertholom, and R. P. Garay, “Selective blockade by nicergoline of vascular responses elicited by stimulation of alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor subtype in the rat,” Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 50–58, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. N. Carfagna and A. Rossi, “Nicergoline: biochemical studies on neuronal metabolism,” Functional Neurology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 177–185, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  16. K. Shintomi, K. Yoshimoto, Y. Ogawa et al., “Effects of nicergoline on cerebral energy metabolism in normal mice,” Yakugaku Zasshi, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 90–94, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. A. Sortino, A. Battaglia, F. Pamparana, N. Carfagna, C. Post, and P. L. Canonico, “Neuroprotective effects of nicergoline in immortalized neurons,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 368, no. 2-3, pp. 285–290, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. R. Bolli, J. A. Ware, T. A. Brandon, D. G. Weilbaecher, and M. L. Mace Jr., “Platelet-mediated thrombosis in stenosed canine coronary arteries: inhibition by nicergoline, a platelet-active alpha-adrenergic antagonist,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 1417–1426, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. E. Pogliani, A. D. Volpe, R. Ferrari, P. Recalcati, and C. Praga, “Inhibition of human platelet aggregation by oral administration of nicergoline. A double blind study,” Il Farmaco: Edizione Pratica, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 630–640, 1975. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. L. D. Iliff, G. H. du Boulay, J. Marshall, R. W. Russell, and L. Symon, “Effect of nicergoline on cerebral blood flow,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 746–747, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. L. Giardino, A. Giuliani, A. Battaglia, N. Carfagna, L. Aloe, and L. Calzà, “Neuroprotection and aging of the cholinergic system: a role for the ergoline derivative nicergoline (Sermion),” Neuroscience, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 487–497, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. T. Nishio, N. Sunohara, S. Furukawa, I. Akiguchi, and Y. Kudo, “Repeated injections of nicergoline increase the nerve growth factor level in the aged rat brain,” Japanese Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 321–323, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. F. Caraci, M. Chisari, G. Frasca et al., “Nicergoline, a drug used for age-dependent cognitive impairment, protects cultured neurons against β-amyloid toxicity,” Brain Research, vol. 1047, no. 1, pp. 30–37, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. E. Ezan, L. Delestre, S. Legendre, R. Rivière, J. L. Doignon, and J. M. Grognet, “Immunoassays for the detection of nicergoline and its metabolites in human plasma,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 123–130, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. W. R. Markesbery, “Neuropathologic alterations in mild cognitive impairment: a review,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 221–228, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. T. A. Voronina, L. N. Nerobkova, T. L. Garibova et al., “Effect of nicergoline on learning and memory,” Methods and Findings in Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 431–435, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. I. K. Rakhmankulova and T. A. Voronina, “Pharmacological analysis of memory disorders of different origins,” Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 107, no. 6, pp. 697–699, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  28. F. Arcamone, A. G. Glasser, J. Grafnetterova, A. Minghetti, and V. Nicolella, “Studies on the metabolism of ergoline derivatives,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 21, pp. 2205–2213, 1972. View at Google Scholar
  29. J. Bousquet, J. P. Rivory, M. Maheut, and F. B. Michel, “Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of nicergoline in the treatment of pruritus in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 825–828, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. T. Akisada, Y. Orita, Y. Sato et al., “Effect of nicergoline on vertigo and tinnitus,” Practica Oto-Rhino-Laryngologica, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 845–855, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. Borgioli, E. Merendino, and B. Ricci, “Therapeutic efficacy of nicergoline in ophthalmology. Fluorescence retinographic study,” Arzneimittel-Forschung, vol. 29, no. 8 A, pp. 1311–1316, 1979. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J. P. Kauffmann, D. Keller, and H. Calderoli, “Value of nicergoline in prevention of postoperative thrombophlebitis,” Medecine et Chirurgie Digestives, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 169–172, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. Y. Nishiyama, A. Abe, M. Ueda, K. Katsura, and Y. Katayama, “Nicergoline increases serum substance P levels in patients with an ischaemic stroke,” Cerebrovascular Diseases, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 194–198, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. T. Nakashima, N. Hattori, M. Okimoto, J. Yanagida, and N. Kohno, “Nicergoline improves dysphagia by upregulating substance p in the elderly,” Medicine, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 279–283, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. Nicergoline Cooperative Study Group, “A double-blind randomised study of two ergot-derivatives in mild to moderate dementia,” Current Therapeutic Research, vol. 48, pp. 597–612, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  36. J. E. Kugler and B. C. Meurer-Krull, “Electroencephalographic and psychometric measurements during treatment of cerebral insufficiency with nicergoline and dihydroergotamine mesilate,” Arzneimittel-Forschung, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 1865–1870, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. A. Battaglia, G. Bruni, A. Ardia, and G. Sacchetti, “Nicergoline in mild to moderate dementia. A multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 295–302, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. J. Tomcsányi, T. Vecsey, and T. Tátrai, “Nicergoline -induced Prinzmetal angina. “Heartache” instead of headache,” Orvosi Hetilap, vol. 145, no. 1, pp. 31–32, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  39. G. Felisati, A. Battaglia, M. G. Papini, B. M. Rossini, and O. Pignataro, “Nicergoline in balance alterations in adult and elderly patients: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study,” Clinical Drug Investigation, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 731–740, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. F. Boismare and J. Lefrancois, “Haemodynamic effects of nicergoline in man at rest and during exercise,” Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 105–112, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. A. Bès, J. Orgogozo, M. Poncet et al., “A 24-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre pilot study of the efficacy and safety of nicergoline 60 mg per day in elderly hypertensive patients with leukoaraiosis,” European Journal of Neurology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 313–322, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. G. Nappi, G. Bono, P. Merlo et al., “Long-term nicergoline treatment of mild to moderate senile dementia,” Clinical Drug Investigation, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 308–316, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. J. Gallego, V. Forner, F. Jimenez, and E. Martinez, “Nicergoline in the treatment of neuropathic bladder dysfunction: a preliminary report,” Paraplegia, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 216–224, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. M. J. Kim, J. H. Chang, S. K. Lee et al., “Acute interstitial nephritis due to nicergoline (Sermion).,” Nephron, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 676–679, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. B. Saletu, E. Paulus, L. Linzmayer et al., “Nicergoline in senile dementia of Alzheimer type and multi-infarct dementia: a double blind, placebo controlled, clinical and EEG/ERP mapping study,” Psychopharmacology, vol. 117, no. 4, pp. 385–395, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. W. M. Herrmann, “A multicenter randomized double-blind study on the efficacy and safety of nicergoline in patients with multi-infarct dementia,” Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 9–17, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. A. Arrigo, A. Moglia, and L. Borsotti, “A double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial with nicergoline in patients with senile dementia,” International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Research, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 33–41, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. M. Fioravanti, T. Nakashima, J. Xu, and A. Garg, “A systematic review and meta-analysis assessing adverse event profile and tolerability of nicergoline,” BMJ Open, vol. 4, no. 7, Article ID e005090, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  49. P. Pfitzenmeyer, P. Foucher, G. Dennewald et al., “Pleuropulmonary changes induced by ergoline drugs,” European Respiratory Journal, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1013–1019, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. F. Boismare, N. Moore, S. Decourt, G. Paux, C. Saligaut, and P. Chretien, “Potentiation by an alpha-adrenolytic agent, nicergoline, of the cardiac effects of propranolol,” Methods and Findings in Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 83–88, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. D. A. Flockhart, “Drug Interactions: Cytochrome P450 Drug Interaction Table,” Indiana University School of Medicine, 2007, http://medicine.iupui.edu/clinpharm/ddis/clinical-table/.