Research Article
Shear Stress, Energy Losses, and Costs: A Resolved Dilemma of Pulsatile Cardiac Assist Devices
Table 1
Pulsatile and nonpulsatile (NP) flows pressures records (mmHg) of three different mock circuits (I, II, and III).
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Circuit I: P1, P2: pre/post-oxygenator pressure; P3, P4: pre/post-tube. Circuit II: P1: pre-oxygenator; P2, P3: pre/post-tube; P4: pre-aortic cannula. Circuit III: P1, P2: pre/post-tube; P3: post-oxygenator; P4: pre-aortic cannula. P5: post simulated resistance in all circuits. Pm: mean pulsatile pressure; Ps: systolic pulsatile pressure, Pd: pulsatile diastolic pressure; PP: pulse pressure. Pulse pressure was higher at P5 in circuit I, compared with II and III. Pm was higher at P5 compared to NP with position I. (). |