Research Article

A Systematic Follow-Up of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Drug-Resistance and Associated Genotypic Lineages in the French Departments of the Americas over a Seventeen-Year Period

Table 2

Observed resistance profiles as a function of the case characteristics (new versus persistent).

Resistance profilesNew case (%)Persistent (%) Total (%)

Resistant to INH*84 (7,0)9 (22,5)0,002 93 (7,5)
Resistant to RIF*27 (2,3)8 (20,0)<0,001 35 (2,8)
Resistant to EMB*6 (0,5)01,000 6 (0,5)
Resistant to SM*66 (5,5)1 (2,5)0,720 67 (5,4)
Resistant to PZA*13 (1,1)01,000 13 (1,1)

Monoresistant to INH**50 (4,2)2 (5,0)0,683 52 (4,2)
Monoresistant to RIF**7 (0,6)1 (2,5)0,231 8 (0,7)
Monoresistant to EMB**00ā€‰0
Monoresistant to SM**40 (3,3)1 (2,5)1,000 41 (3,3)
Monoresistant to PZA**4 (0,3)01,000 4 (0,3)

Resistant to 1 AB***101 (8,4)4 (10)0,770 105 (8,5)
Resistant to 2 AB***32 (2,7)7 (17,5)<0,001 39 (3,1)
Resistant to 3 AB***5 (0,4)01,000 5 (0,4)
Resistant to 4 AB***4 (0,3)01,000 4 (0,3)

comprises all isolates resistant to the respective drugs (irrespective of other associated resistances).
Isolates resistant to only INH (isoniazid), RIF (rifampicin), EMB (ethambutol), SM (streptomycin), or PZA (pyrazinamide), respectively.
Strains resistant to 1, 2, 3, or 4 of the tested antibiotics (AB), no strain displayed resistance to all drugs.