Clinical Study

Resistance to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents Is Associated with Arterial Microcalcification in Early Hemodialysis Patients

Table 1

Comparison of clinical parameters according to arterial microcalcification.

Clinical parametersAll patients ( )
number (%)
AMiC-negative ( )
number (%)
AMiC-positive ( )
number (%)

Age (years)1
 Mean ± SD 0.002
Sex
 Men43 (52.4)25 (51.0)18 (54.5)0.754
 Women39 (47.6)24 (49.0)15 (45.5)
BMI (kg/m2)2
 Mean ± SD 0.863
Chronic kidney disease
 Diabetes44 (53.7)16 (32.7)28 (84.8)0.001
 Nondiabetes38 (46.3)33 (67.3)5 (15.2)
Dialysis prior to vascular access creation67 (81.7)39 (79.6)28 (84.8)0.546
HD duration before Op1
 Mean ± SD (months) 0.304
Kt/V2 0.770
Residual renal function1 (mL/min) 0.114
Phosphate binder
 Calcium57 (69.5)32 (65.3)25 (75.8)0.313
 Noncalcium14 (17.1)8 (16.3)6 (18.2) 0.827
Vitamin D19 (23.2)14 (28.6)5 (15.2)0.158
Lipid-lowering agents27 (32.9)14 (28.6)13 (39.3)0.306

AMiC: arterial microcalcification; BMI: body mass index; HD: hemodialysis; Op: operation for vascular access.
These parameters were compared using Mann-Whitney test and 2these parameters were compared using Student’s -test.