Evaluation of Corneal Deformation Analyzed with Scheimpflug Based Device in Healthy Eyes and Diseased Ones

Table 2

Pearson’s parametric correlations among CST and Pentacam parameters in the four groups evaluated in our study. In bold significant results.

		HEALTHY			PRK			KC			CCC
		KM	CCT	IOP	KM	CCT	IOP	KM	CCT	IOP	KM	CCT	IOP
AT1	Pearson correlation	−0.371	0.442	0.932	0.690	0.354	0.997	−0.609	0.474	0.998	−0.570	0.263	0.994
	𝑃 (2-tailed)	0.022	0.005	0.000	0.002	0.163	0.000	0.012	0.064	0.000	0.042	0.386	0.000
	𝑁	38	38	64	17	17	17	16	16	16	13	13	13
AL1	Pearson correlation	−0.089	−0.006	0.005	−0.170	0.412	−0.063	0.003	0.111	0.475	0.178	0.019	−0.458
	𝑃 (2-tailed)	0.597	0.970	0.969	0.515	0.101	0.810	0.991	0.682	0.063	0.561	0.951	0.116
	𝑁	38	38	64	17	17	17	16	16	16	13	13	13
AV1	Pearson correlation	0.407	−0.151	−0.580	−0.184	0.356	−0.261	0.478	−0.320	0.042	0.650	−0.016	−0.561
	𝑃 (2-tailed)	0.011	0.367	0.000	0.479	0.160	0.311	0.061	0.227	0.878	0.016	0.959	0.046
	𝑁	38	38	64	17	17	17	16	16	16	13	13	13
AT2	Pearson correlation	0.451	−0.329	−0.580	−0.459	−0.399	−0.812	0.429	−0.423	−0.655	0.886	−0.486	−0.691
	𝑃 (2-tailed)	0.005	0.043	0.000	0.086	0.141	0.000	0.097	0.103	0.006	0.000	0.092	0.009
	𝑁	38	38	64	15	15	15	16	16	16	13	13	13
AL2	Pearson correlation	−0.327	0.250	−0.011	0.152	0.173	0.383	−0.351	0.262	−0.174	−0.467	0.184	0.279
	𝑃 (2-tailed)	0.045	0.130	0.930	0.561	0.507	0.129	0.182	0.327	0.518	0.108	0.547	0.355
	𝑁	38	38	64	17	17	17	16	16	16	13	13	13
AV2	Pearson correlation	−0.512	0.326	0.581	0.579	−0.025	0.728	−0.621	0.374	0.258	−0.816	0.584	0.802
	𝑃 (2-tailed)	0.001	0.046	0.000	0.024	0.931	0.002	0.010	0.154	0.334	0.001	0.036	0.001
	𝑁	38	38	64	15	15	15	16	16	16	13	13	13
HCDA	Pearson correlation	0.541	−0.440	−0.786	−0.546	−0.155	−0.838	0.718	−0.383	−0.715	0.852	−0.463	−0.894
	𝑃 (2-tailed)	0.000	0.006	0.000	0.024	0.552	0.000	0.002	0.143	0.002	0.000	0.111	0.000
	𝑁	38	38	64	17	17	17	16	16	16	13	13	13