Review Article

A Survey of FDG- and Amyloid-PET Imaging in Dementia and GRADE Analysis

Table 1

Summary of included 18F-FDG-PET for early diagnosis and conversion prediction, with LHR, increase in LHR+, GRADE, and population.

AuthorsPopulationMethodCohort investigatedFollow-up (months)SensitivitySpecificityLHR+Increase in the LHR+Quality of evidence (GRADE)

Arnáiz et al., 2001 [79]20MCIROI2036 0.67 0.823.72SmallL
*Herholz et al., 2002 [27]110 HC; 395 pADAD t-sum3950.930.9313.29LargeM
Mosconi et al., 2004 [80]37 MCISPM371210.910.00ModerateM
Drzezga et al., 2005 [82]30 MCISPM + Minoshima3016 0.920.898.36ModerateM
Anchisi et al., 2005 [17]48 aMCISPM4812 0.9290.8245.28ModerateM
*Haense et al., 2009a [84]89 AD; 102 HCAD t-sum890.830.783.77SmallL
*Haense et al., 2009b [84]237 AD; 37 HCAD t-sum2370.780.9413.00LargeM
Yuan et al., 2009 [20]280 MCIMeta-analysis28014.250.8880.8495.88ModerateM
*Landau et al., 2010 [85]85 MCI; 97 AD; 102 HCSPM + ROI970.820.72.73SmallL
Brück et al., 2013 [86]22 MCISPM + ROI22240.870.783.95SmallL
*Arbizu et al., 2013 [87]80 HC; 36 MCIc; 85 MCIs; 67 ADAutomated voxel-based analytical method670.8180.865.84ModerateM

Total number of patients and healthy controls considered in the study. Method: quantitative method applied in the study. Cohort investigated: number of patients considered for sensitivity and specificity estimations. Followup: duration of observational period (for early diagnosis study). Sensitivity and specificity: results of the study. LHR+: likelihood ratio. Increase in the LHR+: increase in the probability of the likelihood of the disease. GRADE: results of GRADE evaluation. Quality of evidence was evaluated based on LHR+ values, LHR+ increase probability, and size of the sample included.
Abbreviations: pAD: probable Alzheimer’s disease; MCI: mild cognitive impairment; aMCI: amnestic mild cognitive impairment; MCIc: MCI converters; MCIs: MCI stable; HC: healthy controls.
*Studies including early diagnosis of AD.