Research Article

Effect of High Hydrostatic Pressure Processing on Microbiological Shelf-Life and Quality of Fruits Pretreated with Ascorbic Acid or SnCl2

Table 1

Evolution of microbiological counts ( CFU/g), firmness, values, and sensory evaluation in HHP-treated at 600 MPa for 5 min at 10°C and untreated (control case) apricot pieces in sucrose solution with or without SnCl2 during storage (5°C). Each data point is an average ± standard deviation from three individual batches.

Time (days)Time (days)
01031662312870103166231287

P. polymyxa value
Control1.3 ± 0.12.1 ± 0.44.2 ± 0.7NDNDControl29.3 ± 0.532.5 ± 1.237.7 ± 1.437.8 ± 2.338.5 ± 1.1
1st handling without SnCl2No growth detected (<dl during 287 days)1st handling without SnCl229.5 ± 1.731.9 ± 2.532.4 ± 2.232.9 ± 1.135.9 ± 1.2
1st handling with SnCl2No growth detected (<dl during 287 days)1st handling with SnCl230.4 ± 1.433.5 ± 0.831.0 ± 1.533.9 ± 3.434.7 ± 2.1
2nd handling without SnCl2No growth detected (<dl during 287 days)2nd handling without SnCl231.2 ± 0.933.1 ± 2.631.9 ± 0.731.8 ± 1.934.8 ± 1.4
2nd handling with SnCl2No growth detected (<dl during 287 days)2nd handling with SnCl230.5 ± 1.631.7 ± 1.232.0 ± 2.335.0 ± 1.735.2 ± 2.0
3rd handling without SnCl2No growth detected (<dl during 287 days)3rd handling without SnCl229.9 ± 1.531.8 ± 2.329.4 ± 0.634.6 ± 2.231.8 ± 0.8
3rd handling with SnCl2No growth detected (<dl during 287 days)3rd handling with SnCl230.1 ± 1.630.2 ± 2.231.9 ± 1.035.8 ± 0.535.3 ± 1.9

Total viable counts value
Control1.7 ± 0.25.2 ± 1.36.8 ± 0.5NDNDControl0.2 ± 0.00.4 ± 0.1−0.1 ± 0.01.4 ± 0.11.3 ± 0.1
1st handling without SnCl2No growth detected (<dl during 287 days)1st handling without SnCl20.1 ± 0.00.2 ± 0.0−0.5 ± 0.0−0.1 ± 0.0−0.1 ± 0.0
1st handling with SnCl2No growth detected (<dl during 287 days)1st handling with SnCl20.4 ± 0.10.8 ± 0.10.6 ± 0.10.1 ± 0.10.2 ± 0.0
2nd handling without SnCl2No growth detected (<dl during 287 days)2nd handling without SnCl20.3 ± 0.00.6 ± 0.10.7 ± 0.10.3 ± 0.0−0.1 ± 0.0
2nd handling with SnCl2No growth detected (<dl during 287 days)2nd handling with SnCl20.7 ± 0.11.1 ± 0.21.0 ± 0.10.6 ± 0.10.1 ± 0.0
3rd handling without SnCl2No growth detected (<dl during 287 days)3rd handling without SnCl21.4 ± 0.21.5 ± 0.21.1 ± 0.01.6 ± 0.21.2 ± 0.1
3rd handling with SnCl2No growth detected (<dl during 287 days)3rd handling with SnCl21.9 ± 0.11.8 ± 0.12.2 ± 0.21.8 ± 0.21.2 ± 0.1

Lactic acid bacteria value
Control<dl1.4 ± 0.12.2 ± 0.3NDNDControl10.5 ± 0.312.6 ± 0.214.6 ± 0.316.9 ± 0.316.5 ± 0.8
1st handling without SnCl2No growth detected (<dl during 287 days)1st handling without SnCl210.2 ± 0.211.4 ± 0.210.2 ± 1.010.4 ± 0.214.5 ± 0.3
1st handling with SnCl2No growth detected (<dl during 287 days)1st handling with SnCl212.1 ± 0.313.3 ± 0.411.5 ± 0.313.1 ± 0.513.8 ± 0.6
2nd handling without SnCl2No growth detected (<dl during 287 days)2nd handling without SnCl212.0 ± 0.213.0 ± 0.412.0 ± 0.811.4 ± 0.713.5 ± 0.5
2nd handling with SnCl2No growth detected (<dl during 287 days)2nd handling with SnCl211.9 ± 0.112.3 ± 0.211.9 ± 0.914.6 ± 0.813.8 ± 0.2
3rd handling without SnCl2No growth detected (<dl during 287 days)3rd handling without SnCl212.4 ± 0.213.2 ± 0.110.7 ± 0.714.7 ± 0.510.7 ± 0.3
3rd handling with SnCl2No growth detected (<dl during 287 days)3rd handling with SnCl211.2 ± 0.111.9 ± 0.414.0 ± 0.216.4 ± 1.414.2 ± 0.6

Yeasts
Control<dl4.9 ± 0.76.7 ± 0.4NDNDControl0.01.42.0NDND
1st handling without SnCl2No growth detected (<dl during 287 days)1st handling without SnCl20.00.30.80.50.4
1st handling with SnCl2No growth detected (<dl during 287 days)1st handling with SnCl20.00.10.90.30.7
2nd handling without SnCl2No growth detected (<dl during 287 days)2nd handling without SnCl20.00.40.91.30.5
2nd handling with SnCl2No growth detected (<dl during 287 days)2nd handling with SnCl20.00.81.00.90.5
3rd handling without SnCl2No growth detected (<dl during 287 days)3rd handling without SnCl20.01.01.41.11.3
3rd handling with SnCl2No growth detected (<dl during 287 days)3rd handling with SnCl20.10.91.40.90.9

Firmness
Control34.0 ± 2.420.5 ± 1.215.8 ± 2.224.5 ± 3.515.0 ± 2.3Control10.03.82.8NDND
1st handling without SnCl234.1 ± 1.729.6 ± 3.314.9 ± 1.118.0 ± 2.213.5 ± 2.51st handling without SnCl210.06.36.46.64.9
1st handling with SnCl234.1 ± 1.733.6 ± 2.825.4 ± 2.522.5 ± 1.418.0 ± 3.11st handling with SnCl210.07.86.48.44.6
2nd handling without SnCl232.4 ± 3.049.9 ± 2.538.5 ± 3.040.5 ± 3.243.0 ± 2.62nd handling without SnCl210.07.43.93.16.7
2nd handling with SnCl232.4 ± 3.042.2 ± 3.737.8 ± 2.334.8 ± 2.036.5 ± 2.92nd handling with SnCl210.05.34.96.07.8
3rd handling without SnCl235.0 ± 2.333.3 ± 3.235.9 ± 1.730.0 ± 2.631.0 ± 1.73rd handling without SnCl210.04.04.03.82.4
3rd handling with SnCl235.0 ± 2.332.1 ± 2.424.9 ± 2.129.0 ± 4.430.0 ± 2.83rd handling with SnCl210.06.04.05.56.2

ND: not determined-spoiled product, dl: detection limit (1  CFU/g); athe taste is the mean value of scores given by 8 panelists-0: good, 1: acceptable, 2: spoiled; bthe total evaluation is the mean value of odor, color, texture, and taste of 8 panelists. -10: very good, 5: acceptable, and 1: totally unacceptable.