Research Article

Impact of Gentamicin Coadministration along with High Fructose Feeding on Progression of Renal Failure and Metabolic Syndrome in Sprague-Dawley Rats

Table 4

Renal function assessment parameters (tubular and glomerular functions) along with uric acid level and kidney index (ratio of kidney weight to total body weight).

ParameterTime ControlF2FGG

Glomerular function
 Serum urea mmol/Ld018 ± 2.922.1 ± 3.426 ± 2.917.8 ± 2.8
d2021 ± 2.832.2 ± 3.552.8 ± 224.7 ± 2.4
 Serum creatinined079 ± 5.188 ± 4.178.6 ± 4
d20
 Creatinine clearance mL/min/100 g (B.W)d00.16 ± 0.020.16 ± 0.03
d20
 Urinary protein excretion mg/hrd00.055 ± 0.0080.045 ± 0.0070.051 ± 0.0060.049 ± 0.007
d200.052 ± 0.0060.039 ± 0.0070.094 ± 0.009*@‡0.059 ± 0.007
Serum sodium and potassium
 Serum Na+d0136 ± 2.1134 ± 2.1135 ± 1.4137 ± 1.8
d20139 ± 1.8141 ± 2.8133 ± 2.3135 ± 1.7
 Serum K+d05.7 ± 0.25.6 ± 0.225.6 ± 0.185.5 ± 0.21
d205.6 ± 0.235.9 ± 0.245.3 ± 0.275.7 ± 0.23
Tubular function
 Abs. Na+ excretion ×10−3 mmol/hr d017 ± 1.60 11 ± 1.00*9 ± 1.10*
d2018 ± 1.7010 ± 0.90@34 ± 5.20
 UFR μL/min/100 g (BW)d02.18 ± 0.21.70 ± 0.11.53 ± 0.11.44 ± 0.1*
d202.16 ± 0.121.55 ± 0.081.43 ± 0.06*
 Abs. K+ excretion mmol/hrd00.07 ± 0.01 0.05 ± 0.01*0.04 ± 0.00*
d200.07 ± 0.010.05 ± 0.01$0.27 ± 0.03*,‡0.17 ± 0.015*
 FE Na+d00.51 ± 0.060.37 ± 0.0340.33 ± 0.031
d200.49 ± 0.030.39 ± 0.021$@2.33 ± 0.12*‡ 2.03 ± 0.155*‡
 FE K+d061 ± 5.9439 ± 3.748 ± 6.94
d2067 ± 6.87$49 ± 3.21@$ 195 ± 33.77*‡
Kidney index
 Kidney indexd20 0.67 ± 0.01 0.67 ± 0.02 0.69 ± 0.05 0.7 ± 0.03
Uric acid
 Uric acid μmol/L d011.3 ± 1.3717.1 ± 1.44*@16.4 ± 1.38*@
d202.7 ± 1.3219.6 ± 1.43*13.9 ± 1.4012.9 ± 1.29
 Urine pH d06.7 ± 0.345.3 ± 0.545.5 ± 0.616.4 ± 0.29
d206.9 ± 0.33 4.9 ± 0.56 5.9 ± 0.55 7.2 ± 0.2.8

The measurements were taken on days 0 and 20 which correspond to 38th and 58th days of the high fructose water treatment period. Kidney index was measured at the end of the treatment period. Results are expressed in mean ± SEM. *, ‡, $, and @ indicate statistical significance as compared to control, F2, FG, and G groups, respectively ( ).