Research Article

Psychometric Evaluation of the Chinese Version of the Patient Perceptions of Empowerment Scale (PPES)

Table 1

Summarized research results of empowerment scale.

Author(s)Measure Methods Subjects Results

Lewin and Piper [11]17-item
patient perceptions of empowerment scale
Frequency score and rank142 inpatientsThe 17 items were rescored on a five-point scale; the higher score, the more satisfied the respondent

Anderson et al.
[12, 13]
28-item diabetes-patient empowerment scalePrincipal component analysis375 and 229 diabetes patientsThree-factor solution accounts for 56% of the total variance

Bulsara et al. [14]28-item patient empowerment scaleRasch model analysis100 cancer patientsFitted the Rasch model with the exception of 2 items

Faulkner [15]100-item patient- empowerment/disempowerment
scale (frequency-of- action scale)
Frequency score102 elderly patientsOffered as a means of identifying hospital environments which facilitate independence

Chen et al. [16]15-item diabetes-patient empowerment process scalePrincipal component-
and confirmatory factor analysis
211 diabetes patientsSecond-order four-factor model; four factors: raising awareness, mutual participation, providing information, and communication

Hansson and Björkman [17]28-item empowerment scaleConfirmatory factor analysis176 subjects with mental illnessGood construct validity; two-factors: self-esteem and activism and community and power

Kettunen et al. [18]43-item empowering-speech scaleConfirmatory factor analysis 127 counseling situationsSecond-order two-factor solution explained 59% of variation

Rogers et al. [19]28-item empowerment scalePrincipal components factor analysis271 members of six self-help ProgramsFive-factors: self-efficacy, power, community activism; righteous anger; and optimism and control over the future