|
Drug | Trial design | Number of patients | Phase | Key finding | Reference |
|
Sipuleucel-T | Randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial for asymptomatic metastatic CRPC | 127 | III | Improved OS by sipuleucel-T compared to placebo (25.9 versus 21.4 months) | [17] |
Randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial for asymptomatic metastatic CRPC | 98 | III | Improved OS by sipuleucel-T compared to placebo (19 versus 15.7 months) | [18] |
Randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial for asymptomatic metastatic CRPC | 512 | III | Improved OS by sipuleucel-T compared to placebo (25.8 versus 21.7 months) | [19] |
|
Ipilimumab | Randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial for metastatic CRPC after docetaxel | 799 | III | No difference in OS between the 2 groups, but trend of improved PFS rate by ipilimumab at 6 months (30.7% versus 18.1%) | [20] |
|
Prostvac-VF | Randomized placebo-controlled trial of Prostvac-VF for metastatic CRPC | 125 | II | Improved OS by Prostvac-VF compared to control vector placebo (25.1 versus 16.6 months) | [21] |
Nonrandomized trial for chemotherapy-naive CRPC | 32 | II | Improved OS by Prostvac-VF compared to historical controls (Halabi nomogram): (26.6 versus 17.4 months) | [22] |
|
GVAX | Randomized trial of GVAX with docetaxel versus docetaxel with prednisone in taxane-naïve patients with symptomatic CRPC | 408 | III | Trial terminated early due to excess deaths in GVAX plus docetaxel group compared to control (docetaxel plus prednisone) (67 versus 47), and shorter median OS (12.2 versus 14.1 months). | [23] |
Randomized trial of GVAX with docetaxel versus docetaxel with prednisone in taxane-naïve patients with asymptomatic CRPC | 626 | III | Trial terminated early based on futility analysis showing <30% chance of meeting primary endpoint (improved OS) | [24] |
|