Journals
Publish with us
Publishing partnerships
About us
Blog
BioMed Research International
Journal overview
For authors
For reviewers
For editors
Table of Contents
Special Issues
BioMed Research International
/
2015
/
Article
/
Tab 2
/
Review Article
Prognostic Value of MACC1 in Digestive System Neoplasms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Table 2
Summary of Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale.
Newcastle-Ottawa scale category
Total
Selection
Comparability
Outcome
Stein et al., 2012 [
12
,
13
]
Zhang et al., 2012 [
14
]
Kang et al., 2013 [
15
]
Zhen et al., 2014 [
16
]
Stein et al., 2009 [
3
]
Isella et al., 2013 [
25
]
Kawamura et al., 2012 [
26
]
Ge et al., 2011 [
17
]
Guo et al., 2013 [
18
]
Wang et al., 2013 [
5
]
Zhu et al., 2013 [
9
]
Yang et al., 2013 [
19
]
Qiu et al., 2011 [
10
]
Qu et al., 2012 [
20
]
Ding et al., 2013 [
21
]
Xie et al., 2013 [
22
]
Ji et al., 2014 [
23
]
Gao et al., 2014 [
24
]
The scale includes eight items in total with four items in selection category, one item in comparability category, and three items in outcome category. Stars were given to high-quality elements. Having five or more stars is considered good quality.