Functional Relevance of Coronary Artery Disease by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Cardiac Computed Tomography: Myocardial Perfusion and Fractional Flow Reserve

Table 3

Characteristics of a selected list of studies of the diagnostic performance of stress myocardial perfusion cardiac computed tomography imaging.

Author	Reference		Effective radiation dose (mSv)	Sensitivity	Specificity
George et al. [73]	Stress-CCT versus QCA + SPECT	27	16.8	86%	92%
Blankstein et al. [74]	Stress-CCT and SPECT versus QCA	33	12.7	92%	67%
Rocha-Filho et al. [75]	Stress-CCT versus QCA	34	11.8	96%	100%
Cury et al. [77]	Stress-CCT and SPECT versus QCA	36	14.7	94%	75%
Ho et al. [78]	Stress-CCT versus QCA + SPECT	35	18.2	95%	65%
Bamberg et al. [81]	Stress-CCT versus invasive FFR	33	13.1	95%	64%
Feutchtner et al. [82]	Stress-CCT versus stress-CMR	30	2.5	96%	88%

CCT: cardiac computed tomography; CMR: cardiac magnetic resonance; FFR: fractional flow reserve; QCA: quantitative coronary angiography; SPECT: single photon emission computed tomography.