Review Article
Overcoming the Underutilisation of Peritoneal Dialysis
Table 1
Summary of studies on the impact of predialysis education in modality choice.
| Reference | Study type (number of patients) | Number of patients with structured/timely educational intervention versus controls | Modality choice (PD versus HD) |
|
Ahlmén et al., 1993 [67] | Retrospective single-centre cohort () | N/A (all patients invited to education) | 38% chose PD versus 24% choosing HD |
| Prichard, 1996 [68] | Retrospective single-centre cohort () | N/A (all patients exposed to an extensive education programme) | Of 74 patients with a free modality choice 50% chose PD |
| Little et al., 2001 [69] | Retrospective single-centre cohort () | 65% with timely counselling versus 35% counselled at or after dialysis start | 50.9% chose PD versus 34.8% of controls |
| Marrón et al., 2005 [70] | Retrospective multicentre observational () | 37% versus 63% | 31% chose PD versus 8.3% of controls |
| Ribitsch et al., 2013 [71] | Retrospective single-centre cohort () | 30.8% versus 69.2% | 54.3% chose PD versus 28% of controls |
|
|