Research Article
Seroepidemiology of Leptospira Exposure in General Population in Rural Durango, Mexico
Table 1
Bivariate analysis of a selection of sociodemographic, behavioral, and housing variables and seroprevalence of Leptospira exposure.
| Characteristics |
Number of subjects tested |
Positive ELISA results | value | Number | % |
| Gender | | | | | Male | 62 | 10 | 16.1 | 0.89 | Female | 220 | 34 | 15.5 | Age groups (years) | | | | | 30 or less | 75 | 13 | 17.3 | 0.06 | 31–50 | 120 | 12 | 10.0 | >50 | 87 | 19 | 21.8 | Community | | | | | San Dimas | 94 | 9 | 9.6 | 0.01 | Villa Montemorelos | 82 | 21 | 25.6 | Santa Clara | 106 | 14 | 13.2 | Educational level | | | | | No education | 27 | 4 | 14.8 | 1.00 | Education | 255 | 40 | 15.7 | Occupation | | | | | Employeda | 66 | 11 | 16.9 | 0.78 | Unemployedb | 216 | 33 | 15.3 | Socioeconomic status | | | | | Low | 218 | 37 | 17.0 | 0.24 | Medium | 64 | 7 | 10.9 | Raising farm animals | | | | | Yes | 234 | 39 | 16.7 | 0.27 | No | 48 | 5 | 10.4 | Dogs at home | | | | | Yes | 37 | 8 | 21.6 | 0.27 | No | 245 | 36 | 14.7 | Traveled abroad | | | | | Yes | 44 | 9 | 20.5 | 0.33 | No | 238 | 35 | 14.7 | National trips | | | | | Yes | 148 | 29 | 19.6 | 0.05 | No | 134 | 15 | 11.2 | Soil contact | | | | | Yes | 250 | 40 | 16 | 0.79 | No | 32 | 4 | 12.5 | Source of drinking water | | | | | Home | 172 | 31 | 18 | 0.16 | Out of home | 110 | 13 | 11.8 | Sewage disposal | | | | | Pipes | 130 | 19 | 14.6 | 0.67 | Latrine, other | 152 | 25 | 16.4 | Crowding at home | | | | | No | 62 | 13 | 21 | 0.18 | Yes | 220 | 31 | 14.1 | Education of the head of family | | | | | Up to 3 years | 113 | 27 | 23.9 | 0.002 | More than 3 years | 169 | 17 | 10.1 | Floor at home | | | | | Ceramic | 19 | 2 | 10.5 | 0.19 | Concrete | 184 | 34 | 18.5 | Soil | 79 | 8 | 10.1 |
|
|
Employed: agriculture, construction worker, factory worker, business, professional, and other. bUnemployed: housekeeping, students, or no occupation.
|