Clinical Study
Ultrafast Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: A Comparative Study of Imaging Protocols during Image-Guided Therapy Procedure
Table 7
Displayed sensitivity and predictive values, calculated using UF-CBCT imaging protocols 1 and 2 and magnetic resonance image data.
| Type of tumor | Interpreted as tumor on | True positive | False negative | False positive | True negative | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Positive predictive value (%) | Negative predictive value (%) | MRI | UF-CBCT protocol 1 |
| Hypoenhanced tumors | 41 | 28 | 23 | 18 | 5 | 0 | 56 | 0 | 82 | 0 | Heterogeneously enhanced tumors | 44 | 33 | 27 | 17 | 6 | 0 | 61.3 | 0 | 81.8 | 0 | Homogeneously enhanced tumors | 46 | 34 | 29 | 17 | 5 | 0 | 63 | 0 | 85.3 | 0 |
| | MRI | UF-CBCT protocol 2 | | | | | | | | |
| Hypoenhanced tumors | 43 | 40 | 36 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 83.7 | 0 | 90 | 0 | Heterogeneously enhanced tumors | 41 | 37 | 34 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 82.9 | 0 | 91.9 | 0 | Homogeneously enhanced tumors | 45 | 43 | 41 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 91 | 0 | 95.3 | 0 |
|
|