Review Article

PRP and Articular Cartilage: A Clinical Update

Table 3

Comparative studies concerning PRP intra-articular injections for cartilage pathology.

PRP and intra-articular injections for cartilage pathology: comparative studies
AuthorsYear Number of cases
(age and range in y)
Study Level of evidenceType of PRPProcedure and observationsClinical results

Sánchez et al. [81]200830
(mean age
)
Observational retrospective cohort studyIIIP-PRP3 PRGF injections at 1-week interval; control group: HMW-HA (30 pts); knee articular damage: Ahlbäck grades 1–4. Better improvement of PRGF group at 5 weeks in WOMAC index.

Kon et al. [82]201150
(age 30–81)
Prospective comparative studyIIL-PRP3 L-PRP injections at 2-week interval; before the injection: Ca-chloride was added to activate platelets; control group: HMW-HA (50 pts), LMW-HA (50 pts); knee articular damage: grades 0–4 of Kellgren-Lawrence scale.Better improvement of PRP group at 6 months in IKDC and EQ VAS scores; better results in subgroup of patients with cartilage degeneration; worsening from 2 to 6 months subgroup in patients with advanced OA; no difference between PRP and control groups in patients over 50 years.

Li et al. [83]201115
(age 36–76)
Randomized prospective studyIIL-PRP3 PRP injections at 3-week interval; before the injection: Ca-chloride was added to activate platelets; control group: sodium hyaluronate (LMW-HA) (15 pts).No difference in IKDC score, WOMAC score, and Lequesne index between 2 groups within 4 months; better improvement of PRP group at 6 months.

Filardo et al. [67]201254
(mean age 55;
age 18–80)
Randomized double blind prospective comparative studyIL-PRP3 L-PRP injections at 1-week interval; control group: HMW-HA (55 pts); knee articular damage: grades 0–4 of Kellgren-Lawrence scale.Improvement at 12 months from baseline in IKDC, KOOS, EQ-VAS, and Tegner for both groups; no differences between PRP group and controls; trend toward better results for the PRP group in patients with less degenerated joints.

Spaková et al. [84]201260
(mean age )
Prospective cohort studyIIL-PRP3 PRP injections; control group: HA.Better improvement of PRP group at 6 months in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and the WOMAC index.

Sánchez et al. [86]201279
(mean age
)
Randomized controlled trial IP-PRP3 P-PRP injections at 1-week interval; control group: HMW-HA (74 pts); knee articular damage: Ahlbäck grade I–III.Better improvement of PRP group at 24 weeks in the percentage of patients having a 50% decrease in WOMAC pain subscale; trend toward better improvement (not significant) of PRP group in scores on the WOMAC subscales for stiffness and physical function, in Lequesne index, in the percentage of OMERACT-OARSI responders, and in the amount of acetaminophen in mg/day.

Cerza et al. [85]201260
(mean age
)
Randomized controlled trialIP-PRP4 PRP injections at 1-week interval; control group: LMW-HA (60 pts).Better improvement of PRP group at 24 weeks in WOMAC scores; no correlation with the grade of gonarthrosis.

Mei-Dan et al. [92]201215
(mean age
)
Randomized controlled trial IIP-PRP3 PRGF injections at 2-week interval; control group: HMW-HA (15 lesions; 1-week interval); ankle articular damage: Ferkel grade 1–3 osteochondral lesions.Better improvement of PRP group at 28 weeks in AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale (AHFS), VAS for pain, stiffness, and function, subjective global function scores.

Vaquerizo et al. [87]201348
(age )
Randomized controlled trialIP-PRP3 P-PRP injections at 1-week interval; control group: HMW-HA (48 pts; 1 single injection); knee articular damage: grades 2–4 of Kellgren-Lawrence scale.Better improvement of PRP group at 48 weeks in WOMAC index, Lequesne index and OMERACT-OARSI responders.

Say et al. [88]201345
(mean age 55)
Prospective studyIIP-PRP1 P-PRP injections; control group: HA (45 pts; 3 injections at 1-week interval).Better improvement of PRP group at 6 months in KOOS and VAS for pain.

Patel et al. [89]201352
(group A; age 33–80)
50
(group B; age 34–70)
Randomized controlled trial IP-PRPGroup A (52 knees): single injection of PRP; group B (50 knees): 2 injections of PRP at 3-week interval; group C (46 knees): single injection of normal saline;  knee articular damage: Ahlbäck grade I-II.Better improvement of PRP groups at 6 months in WOMAC, VAS and overall satisfaction with the procedure; no difference between group A and B; slight worsening from 3 to 6 months.

Hart et al. [90]201350
(age 31–75)
Randomized controlled trial IP-PRP9 PRP injections during 1 year; control group (50 pts): 1% mesocain; knee articular damage: Grade II (fibrillation), Grade III (fissuring and fragmentation, but no bone exposed).Better improvement of PRP groups at 12 months in Lysholm, Tegner, IKDC, and Cincinnati scores.

Battaglia et al. [91]201350
(age 25–76)
Randomized controlled trial IL-PRP3 PRP injections at 1-week interval; control group: HMW-HA (50 pts); hip articular damage: grades 2–4 of Kellgren-Lawrence scale.No difference at 12 months between the groups in Harris Hip Score (HHS), NSAID consumption and VAS.

y = years; PRP = Platelet-Rich Plasma; P-PRP = Pure PRP, with a low content of leukocyte; L-PRP = Leukocyte rich PRP; P-PRF = Pure Platelet-Rich Fibrin; LMWHA = Low Molecular Weight Hyaluronic Acid; HMW-HA = High Molecular Weight Hyaluronic Acid; pts = patients; PRGF = “Preparation Rich In Growth Factors” or Plasma-Rich Growth Factors or Platelet Rich Growth Factor with a very low/absent content of leukocytes.