Application and Progress of Combined Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation in the Treatment of Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

Hua, Ping; Liu, Jian-Yang; Tao, Jun; Yang, Song-Ran

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/568502

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 | Article ID 568502 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/568502

Application and Progress of Combined Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation in the Treatment of Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

Ping Hua,¹Jian-Yang Liu,¹Jun Tao,¹and Song-Ran Yang²

Academic Editor: Juan Carlos Chachques

Received31 Mar 2015

Accepted07 Jun 2015

Published29 Jul 2015

Abstract

Treatment of ischemic cardiomyopathy caused by myocardial infarction (MI) using mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) transplantation is a widely researched field, with promising clinical application. However, the low survival rate of transplanted cells has a severe impact on treatment outcome. Currently, research is focused on investigating the strategy of combining genetic engineering, tissue engineering materials, and drug/hypoxia preconditioning to improve ischemic cardiomyopathy treatment outcome using MSC transplantation treatment (MSCTT). This review discusses the application and progress of these techniques.

1. Introduction

Ischemic cardiomyopathy caused by myocardial infarction (MI) continues to be one of the major diseases that threaten human health. MI and ischemic cardiomyopathy lead to heart failure, could increase the socioeconomic burden, and increase the risk of death associated with these complications. Despite heart transplantation, little can be offered to patients suffering from end-stage heart failure, and this is where stem cell therapy stands up. Differentiation of transplanted stem cells into cardiomyocyte-like cells and the corresponding paracrine effect enables stem cell therapy (SCT) for ischemic cardiomyopathy to replenish the lost myocardium, reduce cardiomyocyte apoptosis in the infarction region, alleviate ventricular reconstruction, and improve short-/long-term cardiac function in patients. SCT overcomes many disadvantages of traditional therapies and has therefore become a research hot spot in the field of ischemic cardiomyopathy treatment [1].

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) possess unique properties that may make them a better option for cardiac repair than other cell types. Unlike other adult stem cells, they appear to escape allorecognition by the immune system and they have immune-modulating properties, thus making it possible to consider them for use as an allogeneic cell therapy product. There is a large and growing body of preclinical and early clinical experience with MSC therapy that shows great promise in realizing the potential of stem cell therapy to effect repair of damaged cardiac tissue. MSCs are favored progenitor cells because they could produce a variety of beneficial paracrine cytokines, promote the generation of capillary and endogenous cardiomyocytes in the infarction region after transplantation, are abundant in source, and present low immunogenicity [2, 3]. Many randomized control trials (RCTs) [4–6] and corresponding meta-analyses [7, 8] have shown that transplantation of MSCs can safely and effectively increase left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), reduce the infarction area, and improve cardiac function. However, some RCTs [5] and meta-analyses [9] have shown that improvement of cardiac function resulting from MSC transplantation is limited.

One major limiting factor in MSC transplantation therapy (MSCTT) is the low survival rate of the transplanted progenitor cells. In fact, progenitor cell survival rate 4 days after transplantation is reported to be lower than 0.44% [10, 11]. This is thought to be due to local inflammatory reactions, ischemia, and hypoxia, production of cytotoxic cytokines from necrotic myocardial tissues, and lack of stromal survival signals/intercellular contacts [12]. The efficacy of MSCTT is closely related to this cellular survival rate [13]. To enhance survival of transplanted stem cells, Pouzet et al. [14] found that an increase in the number of transplanted cells improves the efficacy, and the results showed that “the dose of the injected cells was linearly related to the treatment efficacy.” Meluzín et al. [15] carried out the first clinical study to investigate the relationship between transplanted stem cell dose and treatment outcome in 2006. At the 3-month follow-up survey, they found that the magnitude of improvement in LVEF among patients was significantly dependent on the dose of transplanted cells. In contrast, other studies obtained opposing results. Studies by Strauer et al. [16] and Assmus et al. [17] showed that patients benefited equally when subjected to different doses of transplanted cells. Evidence-based TOPCARE-AMI clinical trial (clinical trial number: NCT00711542) [18] indicated that the dose was not correlated with improvements in left ventricular function and reduction of infarction area. Some studies have even reported that an increased number of cells might actually worsen the LVEF [16]. Some researchers suggested that the limited supporting substances for cellular survival within the cardiomyocyte microenvironment would only assure a certain number of cells to survive. Therefore, the higher the number of transplanted cells, the more difficult for cells in the middle of the cell mass to obtain enough oxygen and nutrients and the higher the rate of cell death [19]. Additionally, a higher number of transplanted cells might stimulate the cellular apoptosis process, which would fail to increase the corresponding cellular survival rate in the infarction region [20]. Because the relationship between cell dose and outcome of the MSCTT is still controversial, research is focused on improving the survival and treatment outcomes of MSCTT through multiple methods. These include application of genetically engineered MSCs, coupled with suitable tissue engineering materials, or preconditioning with pharmaceutical and ischemic substances.

2. MSCTT Combined with Genetic Engineering Technology

MSCs are not only ideal progenitor cells but are also good vectors. They can maintain stable expression of exogenous genes, even during the process of proliferation and differentiation. Genetic engineering introduces target genes into MSCs, increasing their survival rate and expression of specific proteins, thus improving their treatment outcome. In 2001, Lee et al. [21] reported that MSCs maintained stem cell activity and stability after a series of transfections of exogenous genes and also assured stable expression of those exogenous genes. Also D. Stewart reported the genetic modification of stem cells in the clinical trial The Enhanced Angiogenic Cell Therapy-Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial (ENACT-AMI, clinical trial number: NCT00936819) [22]. Consequently, transfection of specific genes into MSCs has been investigated and used to increase their survival capability, strengthen their antiapoptosis signaling pathway, or promote secretion of a variety of specific paracrine cytokines, to significantly and favorably enhance the outcome of MSCTT. More recently, however, it has become apparent that many of the functional improvements attributed to MSCs may be due to paracrine actions in the host tissue rather than cell differentiation and repopulation. A resultant shift in research has seen the emergence of studies aiming to elucidate the paracrine mechanisms underlying tissue repair and regeneration with MSCs transplantation.

Hypoxia is a major reason for the low survival rate of transplanted MSCs [23]. Within MSCs, hypoxia can activate the apoptosis protein Bax, lower the Bcl-2/Bax ratio, and alter mitochondrial permeability, leading to the release of cytochrome C and caspase-3 (CASP3). CASP3 inhibits expression of the oncogene Bcl-2, which eventually causes cell apoptosis. Bcl-2 is an important antiapoptotic gene capable of blocking the apoptosis signal transduction pathway, regulating mitochondrial function, and protecting the cell. Li et al. [24] introduced the Bcl-2 gene into MSCs and found that the optimized MSCs could better tolerate hypoxia in the infarction region. They also found that cellular survival rate, vascular density, and recovery of cardiac function in experimental animals were all improved. The CASP3 gene is a key effector protein during the process of cellular apoptosis [25]. Liu et al. [26] interfered with the CASP3 gene using siRNA in the MSCs and found that gene silencing significantly downregulated CASP3 expression and increased survival rate of the MSCs under the hypoxic environment.

The PI3K/AKT pathway is an important antiapoptotic pathway and plays roles in multiple biological processes, including cellular metabolism, the cell cycle, and cellular apoptosis. Studies have shown that activation of AKT can effectively protect the ischemic cardiac muscle [27]. Mangi et al. [28] showed for the first time that AKT-overexpressing MSCs injected into the infarction region of the rat heart survived well with decreased collagen deposition and inflammatory response and reduced infarction region/ventricular remodeling. Gnecchi et al. [29] also found that AKT-transfected MSCs had an increased secretory function and strong antiapoptotic capability; therefore, their survival rate after transplantation was significantly higher than the control group.

Heat shock proteins (HSPs) are a group of proteins induced by heat shock. Studies have shown that MSCs with high levels of HSPs have an increased survival rate. This may be related to the increased AKT activity and enhanced secretion of cytokines, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2), and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), in the presence of HSPs. Chang et al. [30] and Wang et al. [31] modified MSCs with HSP70 and HSP20, respectively, and found that their capabilities for survival, differentiation, and proliferation were all improved. Matsumoto et al. [32] and Hua et al. [33] transfected MSCs with VEGF and found that the capillary density in the infarction region was significantly increased and that cardiac function was also significantly improved. In addition, Tang et al. [13] transfected MSCs with heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1) and transplanted the modified cells into the infarction region in mice to improve the treatment outcome via an immunoregulatory effect. The results showed that, on day 7, MSC survival number was increased 5-fold, ventricular remodeling was inhibited, and cardiac function was significantly improved, as compared to the control. Transfection of MSCs with either tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) by Bao et al. [34] or CC-type chemokine receptor 1 (CCR1) by Huang et al. [35] resulted in decreased apoptosis.

In addition to studies of reduced MSC apoptosis following combined genetic engineering, introduction of genes that stimulate MSC differentiation has also been carried out. For instance, Zhou et al. transfected MSCs with HCN2 [36] and GATA-4 [37] prior to stimulating their differentiation into pacemaker-like cells. Other studies have tested multiple gene transfections to obtain a better outcome. Yau et al. [38] introduced both the VEGF and IGF-1 genes into MSCs and the results showed that this combined transfection could further reduce cellular apoptosis and improve cardiac function compared with individual transfections. This suggests synergism exists for multiple transfected genes. However, some research suggests that modification with two or more genes might greatly increase biological risks and lead to tumor formation [39].

From the perspective of transfection techniques, most studies have used a virus as the target gene vector [40]. Commonly used viruses include adenovirus, retrovirus, and lentivirus. Some studies have also applied nonviral delivery systems, such as liposomes, polymers, electroporation, and nuclei transfection [41]. Continuous advances of these techniques may further improve treatment outcome of their combined application with MSC transplantation in genetic engineering.

3. MSCTT Combined with Tissue Engineering Materials

Transplantation treatments which combine tissue engineering materials with MSCs provide MSCs with a scaffold for attachment and growth. Using this approach, cells can easily enter the defect site, carrying multiple cytokines/drugs to improve the surrounding environment of the infarction region, and stimulate survival/differentiation of the transplanted cells. However, some materials themselves can prevent or postpone ventricular remodeling by inhibition of collagen fiber hydrolysis within the cardiomyocytes and reduction of ventricular wall stress [42]. There are two major categories of cardiac tissue engineered materials: (1) the cardiac patch is seeded with MSCs to construct engineered heart tissue (EHT) and can be placed on the heart surface during surgery; (2) gel scaffolds made of gel materials can be used to encapsulate MSCs and be directly injected into the heart surface.

Collagen protein is often used as a primary material in the cardiac patch. Simpson et al. [43] seeded MSCs onto a cardiac patch made of collagen protein and found that over 90% of MSCs survived longer than 5 days. The same patch, which was subjected to in vitro culture with MSCs for 4 days, was placed on the myocardium in the infarction area. One week after transplantation, left ventricular fractional shortening was reduced by 30% in the treated animals compared with the control group. This suggests that application of the cardiac patch could effectively introduce MSCs into the myocardium in the infarction region and alleviate postinfarction ventricular remodeling. Chen et al. [44] used glycerol sebacate (PGS) to prepare the cardiac patch and found that stem cells on the patch could effectively transform into cardiomyocytes and maintain their activity and beating for over 3 months. The rat did not present any adverse reactions after the patch was stitched onto the left ventricle for 2 weeks. Similarly, Liu et al. [45] and Xiang et al. [46] prepared the cardiac patch using fiber protein and type I glycosaminoglycan, respectively. In both cases, a certain degree of improvement was observed for MSCTT after placing them onto the rat infarction regions.

Some studies have prepared patches with cytokines or drugs. Davis et al. [47] coupled IGF-1 to the scaffold fibers of the cardiac patch through biotinylation. The controlled release of IGF-1 activated AKT to promote survival of the transplanted cells. This method could increase survival of the transplanted cells and prevent the concern of tumor proliferation resulting from transgenesis. Perets et al. [48] prepared porous alginate scaffolds incorporating poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres capable of controlling the release of angiogenic factors and successfully induced proliferation of the transplanted cells. Dvir et al. [49] applied an even more unique method to incorporate cells, growth factors, and angiogenic factors into an alginate scaffold, which was used to construct the cardiac patch prior to transplantation into the rat omentum. Because the omentum is rich in blood supply and lymphocytes secret multiple cytokines, this significantly promoted vascularization of this patch. Seven days later, the patch was explanted and then transplanted onto the rat heart surface. Twenty-eight days after transplantation, the vascularized patch was better integrated into the rat heart, ventricular remodeling was inhibited, and heart function was improved.

Aside from the cardiac patch technology, some gel-like alginates, cellular matrices, and fiber proteins have been constructed into injectable materials and injected in combination with MSCs into the heart surface. This method avoids invasive open surgery and has other advantages. In studies investigating the combined application of cell transplantation and gel materials, Christman et al. [50, 51] confirmed for the first time in experimental animals that injection of fibrin gel containing skeletal myoblasts into the left ventricle of the rat could boost the cell survival rate, reduce the infarction area, increase vascular density, and effectively improve myocardial ischemia, compared with injection of fibrin alone. Many subsequent studies support the use of combined stem cells and liquid gel materials for further improvement in cell transplantation therapy outcome [52, 53].

Combining tissue engineering strategies with MSCTT has been applied in multiple clinical trials [54, 55]. The results have shown that this combination is safe and feasible. However, larger-scale RCTs are still needed to assure the long-term safety and effectiveness of this combination protocol.

4. Drug/Hypoxia Preconditioning

The biological properties of clinical drugs allow them to precondition MSCs or patients who are about to receive cell transplantation to improve MSCTT outcomes through multiple mechanisms. Yang et al. [56] pretreated experimental animals with atorvastatin, 3 days prior to MSC transplantation, and found this drug could improve the cardiac microenvironment and promote the survival rate of transplanted MSCs by increasing myocardial perfusion, suppressing cardiomyocyte apoptosis, reducing oxidative stress, and inhibiting inflammatory reactions. An in vitro hypoxic model later indicated that atorvastatin mainly inhibited MSC apoptosis through the activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase, mediated by the PKA pathway [57]. Zhang et al. [58] directly preconditioned MSCs with atorvastatin and found that it could protect the transplanted MSCs under hypoxia through activation of the MSC autophagy to significantly improve the survival rate. Studies have also found that the traditional Chinese medicine, Huangliansu, can inhibit hypoxia-mediated cell apoptosis in vitro and suggest that the mechanism might be related to inhibition of the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway mediated by Zhang et al. [59]. Additionally, many other drugs such as diazoxide, captopril, nicorandil, minoxidil, bimakalim, and hydrocortisone also improve the survival rate of stem cells.

Hypoxic preconditioning refers to the hypoxic culture of MSCs before transplantation. In 2006, Xie et al. [60] reported for the first time that MSCs subjected to hypoxic preconditioning could differentiate into cardiomyocyte-like cells. Current studies suggested that hypoxic preconditioning can activate the PI3K/AKT pathway and upregulate the expression of hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), to increase the antiapoptotic capability of MSCs [11]. Other studies have confirmed that hypoxic preconditioning also upregulated gene expression of the potassium channel Kv2.1 and activates focal adhesion kinase (FAK) to enhance migration and homing [61]. Hypoxic preconditioning is simple and produces many biological effects. Therefore, it is currently a common preconditioning method used before MSCs are transplanted into the infarction region. However, the optimal oxygen levels and cell culture time warrant further investigation.

5. Summary

Genetic engineering, tissue engineering materials, and drug/ischemic preconditioning could be applied individually or in combination during MSCTT. For instance, Ye et al. [62] introduced VEGF genes into cells more effectively using PEI nanoparticles. Drugs coupled to gels that can be controlled by enzymes or temperature could be more accurately released at specific times and locations. The combined application of a variety of these methods could further improve MSCTT outcomes by maximizing their individual strengths. MSCTT combined with these methods brings more ideal treatment outcomes and more study directions. In the future, this approach will contribute to improving and expanding current applications of stem cell treatments.

Conflict of Interests

The authors have no conflict of interests to disclose.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Social Development Science and Technology Program of Guangdong Province (2012B03180025), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (11ykpy30), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81000508) (http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/), and the Pearl River Science and Technology Star Fund (2012J2200090).

References

A. J. Boyle, S. P. Schulman, J. M. Hare, and P. Oettgen, “Is stem cell therapy ready for patients? Stem cell therapy for cardiac repair. Ready for the next step,” Circulation, vol. 114, no. 4, pp. 339–352, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Makino, K. Fukuda, S. Miyoshi et al., “Cardiomyocytes can be generated from marrow stromal cells in vitro,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 103, no. 5, pp. 697–705, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. S. Krause, “Plasticity of marrow-derived stem cells,” Gene Therapy, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 754–758, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S.-L. Chen, W.-W. Fang, F. Ye et al., “Effect on left ventricular function of intracoronary transplantation of autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell in patients with acute myocardial infarction,” American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 92–95, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. G. Katritsis, P. A. Sotiropoulou, E. Karvouni et al., “Transcoronary transplantation of autologous mesenchymal stem cells and endothelial progenitors into infarcted human myocardium,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 321–329, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J.-A. Wang, X.-J. Xie, H. He et al., “A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of autologous mesenchymal stem cells transplantation for dilated cardiomyopathy,” Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 107–110, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
D. M. Clifford, S. A. Fisher, S. J. Brunskill et al., “Stem cell treatment for acute myocardial infarction,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 2, Article ID CD006536, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
M. M. Lalu, L. McIntyre, C. Pugliese et al., “Safety of cell therapy with mesenchymal stromal cells (SafeCell): a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 10, Article ID e47559, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hristov, N. Heussen, A. Schober, and C. Weber, “Intracoronary infusion of autologous bone marrow cells and left ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 727–733, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Zhu, J. Chen, X. Cong, S. Hu, and X. Chen, “Hypoxia and serum deprivation-induced apoptosis in mesenchymal stem cells,” Stem Cells, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 416–425, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Rosová, M. Dao, B. Capoccia, D. Link, and J. A. Nolta, “Hypoxic preconditioning results in increased motility and improved therapeutic potential of human mesenchymal stem cells,” Stem Cells, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 2173–2182, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Hamedi-Asl, R. Halabian, P. Bahmani et al., “Adenovirus-mediated expression of the HO-1 protein within MSCs decreased cytotoxicity and inhibited apoptosis induced by oxidative stresses,” Cell Stress and Chaperones, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 181–190, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. L. Tang, Y. C. Zhang, K. Qian, L. Shen, and M. I. Phillips, “Improved graft mesenchymal stem cell survival in ischemic heart with a hypoxia-regulated heme oxygenase-1 vector,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 1339–1350, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Pouzet, J.-T. Vilquin, A. A. Hagège et al., “Factors affecting functional outcome after autologous skeletal myoblast transplantation,” Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 844–851, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Meluzín, J. Mayer, L. Groch et al., “Autologous transplantation of mononuclear bone marrow cells in patients with acute myocardial infarction: the effect of the dose of transplanted cells on myocardial function,” The American Heart Journal, vol. 152, no. 5, pp. 975.e9–975.e15, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. E. Strauer, M. Brehm, T. Zeus et al., “Repair of infarcted myocardium by autologous intracoronary mononuclear bone marrow cell transplantation in humans,” Circulation, vol. 106, no. 15, pp. 1913–1918, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Assmus, V. Schächinger, C. Teupe et al., “Transplantation of progenitor cells and regeneration enhancement in acute myocardial infarction (TOPCARE-AMI),” Circulation, vol. 106, no. 24, pp. 3009–3017, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. M. Leistner, U. Fischer-Rasokat, J. Honold et al., “Transplantation of progenitor cells and regeneration enhancement in acute myocardial infarction (TOPCARE-AMI): final 5-year results suggest long-term safety and efficacy,” Clinical Research in Cardiology, vol. 100, no. 10, pp. 925–934, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Y. Huang and J. B. Ge, “Progress on the dose-effect relationship between stem cell transplantation in the treatment of ischemic heart disease,” Chinese Circulation Journal, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 73–75, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
S. A. Afanasiev, L. P. Falaleeva, T. U. Rebrova, T. E. Suslova, S. V. Popov, and R. S. Karpov, “Effect of stress-proteins on survival of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells after intramyocardial transplantation against the background of postinfarction heart remodeling,” Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 146, no. 1, pp. 111–115, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Lee, M. K. Majumdar, D. Buyaner, J. K. Hendricks, M. F. Pittenger, and J. D. Mosca, “Human mesenchymal stem cells maintain transgene expression during expansion and differentiation,” Molecular Therapy, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 857–866, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Taljaard, M. R. Ward, M. J. B. Kutryk et al., “Rationale and design of Enhanced Angiogenic Cell Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (ENACT-AMI): the first randomized placebo-controlled trial of enhanced progenitor cell therapy for acute myocardial infarction,” American Heart Journal, vol. 159, no. 3, pp. 354–360, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Das, H. Jahr, G. J. V. M. van Osch, and E. Farrell, “The role of hypoxia in bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells: considerations for regenerative medicine approaches,” Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 159–168, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Li, N. Ma, L.-L. Ong et al., “Bcl-2 engineered MSCs inhibited apoptosis and improved heart function,” Stem Cells, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 2118–2127, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Y. Yue, Y. Zhang, and Y. Q. Zhang, “Caspase family and apoptosis,” National Medical Frontiers of China, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 25–26, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
J.-L. Liu, P. Hua, S.-R. Yang et al., “Silencing caspase-3 gene effects on the proliferation and apoptosis of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells,” Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, vol. 17, no. 14, pp. 2480–2487, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Matsui, J. Tao, F. Del Monte et al., “Akt activation preserves cardiac function and prevents injury after transient cardiac ischemia in vivo,” Circulation, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 330–335, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Mangi, N. Noiseux, D. Kong et al., “Mesenchymal stem cells modified with Akt prevent remodeling and restore performance of infarcted hearts,” Nature Medicine, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 1195–1201, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Gnecchi, H. He, N. Noiseux et al., “Evidence supporting paracrine hypothesis for Akt-modified mesenchymal stem cell-mediated cardiac protection and functional improvement,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 661–669, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Chang, B.-W. Song, S. Lim et al., “Mesenchymal stem cells pretreated with delivered Hph-1-Hsp70 protein are protected from hypoxia-mediated cell death and rescue heart functions from myocardial injury,” Stem Cells, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 2283–2292, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Wang, T. Zhao, W. Huang et al., “Hsp20-engineered mesenchymal stem cells are resistant to oxidative stress via enhanced activation of Akt and increased secretion of growth factors,” Stem Cells, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 3021–3031, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Matsumoto, T. Omura, M. Yoshiyama et al., “Vascular endothelial growth factor-expressing mesenchymal stem cell transplantation for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1168–1173, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Hua, J. Chen, H.-Z. Zhang et al., “Experimental study of cell transplantation into ischemic myocardium using mesenchymal stem cells transfected by vascular endothelial growth factor,” Chinese Journal of Microsurgery, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 353–356, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Bao, J. Guo, M. Zheng, Y. Chen, G. Lin, and M. Hu, “Enhancement of the survival of engrafted mesenchymal stem cells in the ischemic heart by TNFR gene transfection,” Biochemistry and Cell Biology, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 629–634, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Huang, Z. Zhang, J. Guo et al., “Genetic modification of mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing ccr1 increases cell viability, migration, engraftment, and capillary density in the injured myocardium,” Circulation Research, vol. 106, no. 11, pp. 1753–1762, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-F. Zhou, X.-J. Yang, H.-X. Li, L.-H. Han, and W.-P. Jiang, “Genetically-engineered mesenchymal stem cells transfected with human HCN1 gene to create cardiac pacemaker cells,” Journal of International Medical Research, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1570–1576, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H.-X. Li, Y.-F. Zhou, B. Jiang et al., “GATA-4 induces changes in electrophysiological properties of rat mesenchymal stem cells,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1840, no. 6, pp. 2060–2069, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. M. Yau, C. Kim, G. Li, Y. Zhang, R. D. Weisel, and R.-K. Li, “Maximizing ventricular function with multimodal cell-based gene therapy,” Circulation, vol. 112, no. 9, supplement, pp. I123–I128, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. J. Lee, M. L. Springer, W. E. Blanco-Bose, R. Shaw, P. C. Ursell, and H. M. Blau, “VEGF gene delivery to myocardium: deleterious effects of unregulated expression,” Circulation, vol. 102, no. 8, pp. 898–901, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Stender, M. Murphy, T. O'Brien et al., “Adeno-associated viral vector transduction of human mesenchymal stem cells,” European Cells and Materials, vol. 13, pp. 93–99, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
J. M. Mcmahon, S. Conroy, M. Lyons et al., “Gene transfer into rat mesenchymal stem cells: a comparative study of viral and nonviral vectors,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 87–96, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Shuman, J. R. Zurcher, A. A. Sapp et al., “Localized targeting of biomaterials following myocardial infarction: a foundation to build on,” Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 301–311, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Simpson, H. Liu, T.-H. M. Fan, R. Nerem, and S. C. Dudley Jr., “A tissue engineering approach to progenitor cell delivery results in significant cell engraftment and improved myocardial remodeling,” Stem Cells, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 2350–2357, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q.-Z. Chen, H. Ishii, G. A. Thouas et al., “An elastomeric patch derived from poly(glycerol sebacate) for delivery of embryonic stem cells to the heart,” Biomaterials, vol. 31, no. 14, pp. 3885–3893, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Liu, Q. Hu, Z. Wang et al., “Autologous stem cell transplantation for myocardial repair,” The American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 287, no. 2, pp. H501–H511, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
Z. Xiang, R. Liao, M. S. Kelly, and M. Spector, “Collagen-GAG scaffolds grafted onto myocardial infarcts in a rat model: a delivery vehicle for mesenchymal stem cells,” Tissue Engineering, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 2467–2478, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. E. Davis, P. C. H. Hsieh, T. Takahashi et al., “Local myocardial insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) delivery with biotinylated peptide nanofibers improves cell therapy for myocardial infarction,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 21, pp. 8155–8160, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Perets, Y. Baruch, F. Weisbuch, G. Shoshany, G. Neufeld, and S. Cohen, “Enhancing the vascularization of three-dimensional porous alginate scaffolds by incorporating controlled release basic fibroblast growth factor microspheres,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 489–497, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Dvir, A. Kedem, E. Ruvinov et al., “Prevascularization of cardiac patch on the omentum improves its therapeutic outcome,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 35, pp. 14990–14995, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. L. Christman, A. J. Vardanian, Q. Fang, R. E. Sievers, H. H. Fok, and R. J. Lee, “Injectable fibrin scaffold improves cell transplant survival, reduces infarct expansion, and induces neovasculature formation in ischemic myocardium,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 654–660, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. L. Christman, H. H. Fok, R. E. Sievers, Q. Fang, and R. J. Lee, “Fibrin glue alone and skeletal myoblasts in a fibrin scaffold preserve cardiac function after myocardial infarction,” Tissue Engineering, vol. 10, no. 3-4, pp. 403–409, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. H. Ryu, I.-K. Kim, S.-W. Cho et al., “Implantation of bone marrow mononuclear cells using injectable fibrin matrix enhances neovascularization in infarcted myocardium,” Biomaterials, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 319–326, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Kofidis, J. L. de Bruin, G. Hoyt et al., “Injectable bioartificial myocardial tissue for large-scale intramural cell transfer and functional recovery of injured heart muscle,” Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 571–578, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Chachques, J. C. Trainini, N. Lago et al., “Myocardial assistance by grafting a new bioartificial upgraded myocardium (MAGNUM clinical trial): one year follow-up,” Cell Transplantation, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 927–934, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Chachques, J. C. Trainini, N. Lago, M. Cortes-Morichetti, O. Schussler, and A. Carpentier, “Myocardial Assistance by Grafting a New Bioartificial Upgraded Myocardium (MAGNUM Trial): Clinical Feasibility Study,” Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 901–908, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-J. Yang, H.-Y. Qian, J. Huang et al., “Atorvastatin treatment improves survival and effects of implanted mesenchymal stem cells in post-infarct swine hearts,” European Heart Journal, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 1578–1590, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Song, Y. Yue, Q.-T. Dong, H.-Y. Qian, H. Xu, and X.-M. Meng, “Atorvastatin mainly by AMP protein kinase rather PI3K/Akt signaling pathway inhibits apoptosis of mesenchymal stem cells in bone marrow of pigs,” Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 1033–1038, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
Q. Zhang, Y.-J. Yang, H. Wang et al., “Autophagy activation: a novel mechanism of atorvastatin to protect mesenchymal stem cells from hypoxia and serum deprivation via AMP-activated protein kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin pathway,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1321–1332, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Zhang, X. Su, Y. Gao et al., “Berberine protects mesenchymal stem cells against hypoxia-induced apoptosis in vitro,” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1335–1342, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X.-J. Xie, J.-A. Wang, J. Cao, and X. Zhang, “Differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells induced by myocardial medium under hypoxic conditions,” Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1153–1158, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Hu, L. Wei, T. M. Taylor et al., “Hypoxic preconditioning enhances bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell migration via Kv2.1 channel and FAK activation,” The American Journal of Physiology—Cell Physiology, vol. 301, no. 2, pp. C362–C372, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Ye, W. Zhang, L.-P. Su et al., “Nanoparticle based delivery of hypoxia-regulated VEGF transgene system combined with myoblast engraftment for myocardial repair,” Biomaterials, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 2424–2431, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2015 Ping Hua et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1229

Downloads

989

Citations