Research Article
Solid Phase-Based Cross-Matching as Solution for Kidney Allograft Recipients Pretreated with Therapeutic Antibodies
Table 1
Comparison of the outcome of CDC-based cross-matching with ELISA-based cross-matching (AMS- or AbCross-ELISA, resp.) as shown for twenty-seven patients treated with anti-CD20 mAb Rituximab and four patients treated with anti-CD25 mAb Basiliximab (Simulect).
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The outcomes of CDC-based and ELISA-based cross-matching are compared by showing the respective NIH-scores (introduced in Section 2.2) and the corresponding ELISA-based results (introduced in Section 2.2). Additionally, the maximal level of panel reactive antibodies [PRA max.] (introduced in Section 2.3) of each patient is indicated exhibiting the highest historical individual level of immunization against HLA-antigens of the quarterly antibody screening runs. #No donor-specific antibodies were identifiable by virtual cross-matching using the Luminex- or DynaChip specifications in spite of the general preimmunization (positive PRA-value); &donor-specific anti-HLA class II antibodies were identifiable by virtual cross-matching using Luminex- or DynaChip specifications. |