Research Article

User Satisfaction Evaluation of the EHR4CR Query Builder: A Multisite Patient Count Cohort System

Table 4

List of usability issues encountered by participants.

TaskMissing functionalitiesUser numberExpert review

Task 1Criteria of >49 years were selected but appear as ≥49 years User 01Not important; mistake in specification of query not tool
No ability to execute results for all countries, only for UK/no response when clicking on all countries User 19Medium importance; probably a problem with available sites not with the tool
The query in eclectic format did not show up and looked similar to screen shot in training manual User 06Low importance; feature only used for testing probably be removed for “real world” version of tool

Task 2Than & less selections appear transformed into more & less than OR EQUAL to User 01Not important; mistake in specification of query not tool

Task 3The sequence of building the query is not clear; system seems to require it in reverse (i.e., the parameters of time to be entered before the diagnosis) User 18, user 19Important; comment on usability though unspecific
Entering exclusion criteria (e.g., 3.3.4 EC02) is cumbersome User 06Important; comment on usability though unspecific
No visible option how to add a range of 5–30 months; the range always began at 0 months User 01Medium importance; option is there when user selects “between” rather than “more than” or “less than,” user interface issue, or poor documentation
No way to clear just one component from the query; “clear” clears all components/if you want to change particular part of the inclusion or exclusion criteria, you have to delete the whole; it would be better to delete parts User 06, user 21Medium/low; true but the individual inclusion sections are never hugely complex so deleting all is not too bad
The “before now” button did not work several times User 19Important; was not seen this reproduced though
The run function and eclectic format were not possible; computer crashed when running the query or doing it in eclectic format/“does not compute” message appeared, when trying to generate the eclectic formatUser 21, user 01Important; a “crash” reproduced elsewhere was not seen
System feedback was that query had been saved, but it does not appear to have been User 01Important; true in terms of lack of feedback, but it is always saved
If you want to check a specific value of a criterion (e.g., if left ventricular ejection fraction was correctly entered and you want to check it later) you are not able to see it by clicking on the symbols User 21Important; this information appears at the bottom of the screen and not where user would originally see it and may need to scroll, user interface issue

Responses to the open-ended question “What function or feature do you miss for this task?,” and expert review of usability issues; participants.