Research Article

Cross-Platform Evaluation of Commercial Real-Time SYBR Green RT-PCR Kits for Sensitive and Rapid Detection of European Bat Lyssavirus Type 1

Table 2

Comparison of RT-qPCR SybrGreen kits (two-step) provided by the same manufacturer. Results of five different qPCR kits on a range of seven triplicate dilutions of EBLV-1 RNA.

Testing of different RT-qPCR kits (two-step) provided by the same manufacturer
Number of copies/sampleNumber of copies/rxnIScript RT + qPCR SsoFastQuantiTect RT + qPCR QuantitectMaxima RT + qPCR MaximaSS Vilo RT + qPCR ExpressqScript RT + qPCR Perfecta
Average CtCV (%)Average CtCV (%)Average CtCV (%)Average CtCV (%)Average CtCV (%)

1065.0 10516.58 ± 0.13 0.77 19.47 ± 0.07 0.34 16.50 ± 0.15 0.92 15.01 ± 0.05 0.35 16.09 ± 0.03 0.19
18.96 ± 0.040.2122.79 ± 0.261.1517.47 ± 0.090.5217.49 ± 0.100.5417.99 ± 0.291.59
1055.0 10419.93 ± 0.09 0.45 22.89 ± 0.10 0.42 19.50 ± 0.06 0.33 18.21 ± 0.05 0.26 19.79 ± 0.03 0.13
22.17 ± 0.060.2525.94 ± 0.090.3521.16 ± 0.291.3820.95 ± 0.030.1521.27 ± 0.150.72
1045.0 10323.28 ± 0.05 0.20 25.89 ± 0.06 0.25 22.95 ± 0.28 1.23 21.68 ± 0.17 0.76 23.18 ± 0.16 0.67
25.75 ± 0.050.1829.60 ± 0.421.4324.29 ± 0.290.3924.40 ± 0.120.4924.55 ± 0.080.33
1035.0 10226.61 ± 0.21 0.80 29.64 ± 0.32 1.07 26.43 ± 0.26 0.98 24.81 ± 0.05 0.19 26.94 ± 0.08 0.30
29.16 ± 0.230.8032.10 ± 0.190.6027.78 ± 0.301.0928.03 ± 0.742.6327.84 ± 0.120.42
1025.0 10130.45 ± 0.13 0.42 32.20 ± 0.41 1.26 30.59 ± 0.45 1.46 28.33 ± 0.64 2.25 31.40 ± 0.53 1.68
32.38 ± 0.611.8935.12 ± 0.100.2830.46 ± 0.923.0331.05 ± 0.381.2331.35 ± 0.702.22
1015.0 1002/3**1/3**2/3**31.52 ± 1.33 4.20  1/3**
1/3**1/3**32.76 ± 0.702.121/3**2/3**
10.51/3**0/3**0/3**0/3**0/3**
0/3**0/3**0/3**0/3**2/3**

Efficiency99% 99% 100% 101% 90%
96%107%97%93%102%

0.999 0.997 0.997 0.999 0.999
0.9990.9910.9970.9940.998

y-intercept 36.65 39.55 36.31 34.73 37.67
39.3841.8338.0138.5038.01

CV (%) = standard deviation/mean Ct × 100.
CV was not calculated when some of the parallels failed to amplify.
/: number of positives/number of experiments.
Average Ct values: mean ± standard deviation.
All PCR comparisons were run on the Rotor Gene Q MDx thermocycler (in italic font) and on the Mx3005P thermocycler (in bold).