Research Article

Increased Fracture Collapse after Intertrochanteric Fractures Treated by the Dynamic Hip Screw Adversely Affects Walking Ability but Not Survival

Table 3

Ordinal regression of factors which predicted increasing severity of collapse. Value with a positive (+) estimate predicts more fracture collapse and that with a negative (−) estimate predicts less.

Estimated likelihood of increased fracture collapse in ordinal regression
EstimateStandard errorWalddfSig.95% confidence interval

Per day delay from admission to operation−0.1210.1910.4011.0000.527−0.4960.254
Operative time per minute increase0.0210.0086.4841.0000.0110.0050.037
Age at operation per year increase0.0490.0234.3691.0000.0370.0030.095
MMSE per mark increase0.0250.0231.1821.0000.277−0.0200.071
MBI per mark increase0.0070.0080.7011.0000.402−0.0090.023
Poor premorbid walking status (independent versus assisted versus dependent)−0.2780.2820.9741.0000.324−0.8310.274
Poor reduction quality (good versus acceptable versus poor)1.1120.24021.5101.0000.0000.6421.582
Male versus female−0.6800.3025.0671.0000.024−1.271−0.088
31.A1 class versus A2−0.7190.2816.5701.0000.010−1.269−0.169
Screw versus blade−0.1560.2840.3011.0000.583−0.7120.401
Operated by specialists (>6 years of experience)0.3600.3111.3381.0000.247−0.2500.971
Suboptimal centre-centre or centre-inferior lag screw position0.1280.2950.1901.0000.663−0.4490.706
ASA 1-2 versus 3-40.1940.2920.4411.0000.506−0.3780.765
Suboptimal tip-apex distance > 25 mm1.9781.0113.8291.0000.050−0.0033.959

Pseudo -square (Nagelkerke) = 0.244