Research Article

The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy

Table 2

Comparison of TIC parameter between CSP and intrauterine pregnancy patients.

ParameterCesarean scar pregnancies ()Intrauterine pregnancy ()

Time parameter
 Arrival time/s10.91 ± 1.2717.25 ± 0.8926.886<0.001
 Time to peak/s24.73 ± 2.6439.75 ± 1.8330.67<0.001
 Time from peak to one half/s81.56 ± 3.7479.90 ± 2.972.3030.024
Intensity parameter
 Basic intensity/dB0.49 ± 0.060.50 ± 0.070.7370.463
 Peak intensity/dB19.17 ± 2.0410.39 ± 1.1524.384<0.001
 Wash in slope/(dB/s)1.16 ± 0.161.18 ± 0.220.5050.615

TIC: time-intensity curve; CSP: cesarean scar pregnancy; dB: Decibel.
Analysis of the TIC time parameters showed faster arrival time, time to peak, and time from peak to one half () in patients with CSP, when compared with intrauterine pregnancy patients. The TIC intensity parameters showed that CSP patients had a higher peak intensity than intrauterine pregnancy patients (). There were no obvious differences between CSP and intrauterine pregnancy patients in basic intensity and wash-in slope ().