Study Insights into Gastrointestinal Cancer through the Gut Microbiota

Kong, Fanli; Cai, Yi

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8721503

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusions Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Prevention and Early Detection of Gastrointestinal Cancers

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 | Article ID 8721503 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8721503

Study Insights into Gastrointestinal Cancer through the Gut Microbiota

Fanli Kong¹and Yi Cai¹

Guest Editor: Qiang Tong

Received22 Apr 2019

Accepted28 May 2019

Published24 Jun 2019

Abstract

The gut microbiome in human is recognized as a “microbial organ” for its roles and contributions in regulating the human homeostasis and metabolism. Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, especially colorectal cancer (CRC), rank as the most common cancer-related deaths worldwide. Evidences have suggested that the disorder of gut microbiota, also named as “dysbiosis,” is related to the development of a variety of diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and the CRC. However, detailed mechanisms between disease and gut microbiota remain largely unknown. This review introduced the correlation between gastrointestinal diseases and the microbiota in human gut from the recent studies, as well as the roles of microbiota in manipulating the CRC and IBDs development, in order to facilitate future studies and to develop novel methods for the precaution, diagnosis, or even cure of gastrointestinal diseases. Additionally, we also elucidated the possibility of probiotics in treatment against CRC.

1. Introduction

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, especially colon cancer, caused the second highest deaths resulting from cancer in developed countries with more than 4 million new cases arising each year [1]. In pathological diagnosis, the colorectal cancer (CRC) is mainly caused by unhealthy diet, mutation of genes, inflammation, irregular life schedule, and the disorder of microbiota in the gut, and more than 95% of CRC is believed to occur among people who have no predisposition in genes [2]. Since the early phase of the GI diseases is usually asymptomatic, it poses a significant challenge to clinical diagnosis. The trillions of microorganisms inhabited in/on human body are reported to be more and more important as indicators of or contributors to the human health. The so-called “gut microbiota”, for example, are involved in various essential functions including digestion, metabolism, and sustaining the immune system. For the past couple of decades, a considerable amount of studies had demonstrated the correlation of gut microbiota composition and function with atherosclerotic disease [3], metabolic disease [4], and colon cancer [5]. Obesity, for example, is proved to be partly determined by the community structure changes of the gut microbiota. At present, methods of colonoscopy, computed tomography, and blood tests, etc. are widely used for early clinical diagnosis, though the inspection of the gut microbiota is expected to be an alternative way to detect GI cancers early. Nevertheless, most of the researches concentrated on the correlation of altered microbiota and pathophysiology instead of the causative mechanism of the change of microbiome. Although there are significant efforts in improving treatment, such as the development of new drugs, the prognosis for advanced stages of GI disease even the GI cancers is still limited. Consequently, this review mainly elaborates the potential relationship between gut microbiota and the development of GI cancers based on published researches and discusses the influence of major external factors on the constitution of gut microbiota as well as explores the potential of probiotics in the treatment against GI cancers.

2. Human Gut Microbiota

The gut microbiota, colonized in gastrointestinal (GI) tract, consists of various microorganisms including bacteria, archaea, viruses, fungi (mostly yeasts), and some eukaryotes. Most of the bacteria belong to the phyla of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes accounting for more than 90% in healthy human intestinal tract, followed by Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, and Fusobacteria [6, 7]. The population of the bacteria in the stomach and small intestine is rather small, while the concentration of microorganisms in the large intestine is significantly higher. Studies showed that there are probably around 1,000-1,150 bacteria existing in human colon [6, 8]. Most of the microbiome show a favorable symbiotic relationship with the host [9, 10]. However, when the microbiome composition and function are perturbed, it will be increasingly linked to various conditions and diseases including cancers, obesity, metabolic diseases, diabetes, allergies, depression, and disorders in the immune system [11, 12]. Meanwhile, a variety of factors including genetics, diet, age, antibiotics, mode of delivery, stress, environmental factors as well as psychological factors can influence the constitution and structure of microbiota in human gut [13].

With the emergence of next-generation sequencing technology, the links between the gut microbiota and its related diseases have been the focus of research. What’s more, the microbiome analysis also opens up a new insight into developing biomarkers to diagnose disease and management even at potential therapeutic applications. For example, particular categories of bacteria are involved in the initiation of cancer, e.g., Clostridia, Streptococcus bovis, Helicobacter pylori, and Bacteroides, while other categories of bacteria, e.g., Bifidobacterium longum and Lactobacillus acidophilus, can suppress carcinogen and induce colon tumor development, which means the gut microbiota also shows a balance between “detrimental” and “beneficial” bacteria to act on host [14]. However, it is still a big challenge for studying mechanism of gut microbiota in host metabolism, that is because (1) the human gut microbiota is showed high interindividual variability and big complexity, (2) these microorganism interacting with each other is influenced by food inconsistent with the host, and (3) the majority of microbiota are nonsequenced members, which heavily limits interpretation.

3. The Main Gastrointestinal Disease and Gut Microbiota

The gut microbiota is highly active and deeply involved in the mucosal immune system and the maintenance of intestinal homeostasis. Not only are various environmental factors such as diet and life style related to IBD and GI cancers, changes of the gut microbiota also lead to IBD and colon cancer. The potential roles of dysbiosis of gut microbiota during the GI diseases focusing on inflammatory bowel diseases and colon cancer are discussed as follows.

3.1. The Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD)

IBDs are a category of long-term inflammatory disease of gastrointestinal tract in human, associated with a number of environmental factors. The pathogenesis includes mucosal barrier function and ulcers in patients. Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are two predominant IBDs conditions that cause the disorder of the epithelial barrier in the intestine as well as the immune system’s response to gut microbiome [15]. In general, UC is an inflammatory disease confined to the colonic mucosa, whereas CD has the potential to develop along the entire gastrointestinal tract in small and large intestines. The change of gut microbiota, or dysbiosis, very likely causes IBD in recent researches, but it is still unknown whether the microbiota changes initiate the disease pathogenesis. The immunity to IBD was reported to be strongly determined by polymorphisms in bacterial sensor genes in the host including nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing protein 2 (NOD2), which is also named as caspase recruitment domain-containing protein 15 (CARD15) [16, 17], and toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) [18]. The Fusobacterium species might be related to IBD, such as Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis (UC). And a study showed that patients who suffer from CD or UC have different community structures of gut microbiome using PCR-based approaches [19, 20] (Table 1). More specifically, by using the next-generation sequencing method, the microbiome was found to be in disorder with higher concentration of Neisseriaceae, Fusobacteriaceae, Enterobacteriaceae, Veillonellaceae, Gemellaceae, and Pasteurellaceae and lower concentration of Bacteroidales, Erysipelotrichaceae, Clostridiales, and Bifidobacteriaceae [6, 21, 22]. Moreover, individuals who suffer from chronic IBD have higher possibilities of developing colorectal cancer [23], which accounts for almost 10-15% of their deaths [24, 25].

3.2. The Colon/Colorectal Cancer (CRC)

Epidemiologic studies have shown that the cause of colon or colorectal cancer (CRC) includes heredity, diet, environmental factors, life style, microbial exposures, and host immunity [26, 27]. The incidence of CRC mainly occurs in Western countries with high-fat, low-fibre diet (so-called Western diet), seldom in South America, Africa, and Asia, but there’s no direct relationship between CRC and the diet. Genetically, the CRC is adenocarcinomas originating in epithelium by DNA damage or chromosomal instability or chronic inflammation [28], and chronic inflammation is widely recognized as a risk factor for CRC initiation and development [29].

Colonic mucosa is a place that regulates the differentiation and proliferation of the epithelial cells, defenses the invasion of pathogenic bacteria, synthesizes the bioactive products as well as fundamental nutrients, and stimulates the immune system [30]. For long, colonic mucosa is believed to be one of the causes of colon tumorigenesis for its constant exposure to the microbiome and/or its metabolites which can cause a long-term inflammatory response in the inflammatory cells. In this case, the colonic microbiota is a potential key factor to CRC [31, 32]. Therefore, the researches on the roles of gut microbiota in the development of tumorigenesis and colon cancer have drawn a considerable amount of attention. Harold et al. proposed a bacterial “driver-passenger model” to show the important roles of microbial involvement in the CRC development [33]. In detail, the “driver” bacteria can initiate the occurrence of CRC, eventually the “passenger” bacteria can replace the “driver” bacteria to promote or stall tumorigenesis. In recent decades, experiments revealed that the concentration of Fusobacterium nucleatum in patients who suffer from CRC was significantly higher than that of healthy people, yet the level of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes was significantly low in tumors with abundant Fusobacterium [34]. The study found the major difference of colon cancer patients from healthy individuals is the high concentration of pathogenic bacteria including Enterococcus faecalis, Bacteroides fragilis, Escherichia coli, and Fusobacterium nucleatum [35]. Boleij et al. showed that the expression of Bacteroides fragilis gene was more frequent in CRC patients than that of healthy individuals [36]. Similar finding showed in late-stage cancer patients.

The disorder of gut microbes also leads to the production of harmful metabolites, such as acetaldehyde, secondary bile acid, and glucuronic acid that dramatically influence the development of CRC [37]. In addition, the colonic microbiota may elicit host responses, for example, by stimulating exaggerated immune responses, potentially via Th17 cells, to promote CRC [38]. However, the specific mechanism behind the correlation remains unclear. Recently, researchers used specific bacteria as feed additives in mice to study the interaction between microbiota and the barrier of colonic mucus as well as the interplay of microbe-microbe [39–41]. The induction of Enterococcus faecalis shows the genotoxicity of the microbes to colonic epithelial cells [38]. Fusobacterium nucleatum is the most striking bacteria in CRC. The study showed that it is initially discovered in mouths as a proinflammatory microbe that adheres to the mucosa adherent [42]; subsequently, the Fusobacterium nucleatum was also found to promote colon cancer and diseases [43]. Therefore, it is possible to take advantage of Fusobacterium to detect colon cancer [44, 45]. Similarly, it is also possible to utilize Butyricicoccus and E. coli to screen out adenomatous colon mucosa [46, 47]. In Table 2, we showed potential “driver-passenger” bacteria to be used for the detection of CRC.

4. Two Main Factors Affecting GI Disease in Gut Microbiota

The human gut microbiota is influenced by a myriad of factors including diet, inflammation, and antibiotics. The links between diet and colon cancer have been plausible for the incidence of colon cancer for a long time. Antibiotics are used to remove or suppress unwanted microorganisms, whereas probiotics/prebiotics can directly introduce the beneficial microorganisms or stimulate the reproduction of microorganisms which are beneficial to the host.

4.1. Diet

Diet is a vital factor of modulating the structure of gut microbiota. It determines the prevention and initiation as well as progression of disease or cancer. Studies showed that unhealthy lifestyle, junk food, and malnutrition contribute to 30-40% of various cancers [48]. The diet components, by changing the gut microbiota composition, can change gut homeostasis and modulate the host inflammatory and immune responses. The direct influence on CRC of diet could be related with excessive consumption of fats and proteins, such as Western-style diet, which has been confirmed by Haenszel and coworkers [49]. The gut microbiota of mice that mostly consume standard food displayed changes in the composition of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes within a few weeks after switching to a low-fat diet, and the concentration of Mollicutes, a species of Firmicutes, decreased dramatically [50, 51]. Further study showed that the mice eating high-fat diet and mice eating low-fat diet were different in colon microbiota, which affected the growth of tumor [52]. In conclusion, to a large extent, CRC and the growth of tumor are associated with changes of gut microbiota caused by unhealthy diet [53].

Moreover, a variety of environmental factors including food and medicine directly influence human gut microbiota. Whether the disorder of microbiota causes CRC depends on the antibiotic system’s capability to restore the order of gut microbiota and suppress the reproduction of epithelia controlled by host cell cycle regulating genes [54]. As a result, another dimension, antibiotic alternatives, such as pro/prebiotics, has been a new promising approach to study the interaction between food and our gut microbiome.

4.2. Pro/Prebiotics

Not only can diet influence the gut microbiota positively, dietary supplement including probiotics, symbiotics, or prebiotics also influence the well-being of host intestinal tract. Probiotics are live microorganisms that alter the gut microbiota positively. Except for enhancing the immune system via the production of anti-inflammatory factors, probiotics also help generate short-chain fatty acids, antioxidant, and anticancer compounds [55]. Despite some disagreements, it is still widely believed that prebiotics and probiotics benefit gut microbiome [56]. In colon cancer, it is proved that probiotic is a new and promising approach to increase colon cancer of chemotherapy effectiveness [57]. Probiotics benefit the host in different ways including colon cancer prevention, colitis reduction, immune system regulation, blood cholesterol reduction, and suppression of pathogenic bacteria [14]. Furthermore, in animal model, Sivan et al. found that Bifidobacterium longum and Bifidobacterium breve together could improve controlling cancer, reduce tumor development, and increase the anti-PDL1 role in antitumor [58]. Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain can decrease cellular proliferation and carcinogenesis [59]. These data suggest that it is possible to use pro/prebiotics as an alternative or assistance factors to anticancer since they not only lower the side effect of traditional cancer treatment but also improve the safety of traditional cancer treatment [60, 61]. However, more clinical trials are needed to test and verify the effects of probiotics in the diagnosis, treatment, even ultimately in the prevention of human disease.

5. The Methods Used to Study GI Cancers and Microbiota

Early studies evaluating specific microbes mainly focus on species identification or toxin presence for pathogens based on culture-dependent species including Streptococcus bovis [62], which is hard to fully evaluate anaerobic constituents. The next-generation sequencing technique, especially when was applied on bacterial 16S rRNA sequencing, has enabled a great deal of clinical studies including identification of the anaerobic genus Fusobacterium related to CRC [63]. The entire genome sequences of Fusobacterium species have been compared between cases and controls. So, the advance in high-throughput sequencing technologies will facilitate major improvement to understand the microbial ecology and now these biotechnological applications have been widespread in all aspects from personalized medicine to bioenergy [64, 65]. Using the metagenomic method, they derived a positive correlation between the capacity of host glycan degradation and tumor count and a negative relationship between the potential for butyrate production and tumor count, which demonstrated the function of mucus degraders in tumorigenesis [66]. The short-read next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based method, however, is still limited when capturing bacteria. To capture the effect, the whole-genome shotgun sequencing approach or the complete 16S rRNA gene might be essential. Nowadays, various omics fields contribute to the discovery of disease, such as genomics, metagenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and phenomics or exposomics, which creates almost infinite pathogenic results to better identify the central regulators. The multiomics integration is possibly curative, which constitutes the foundation of gut disease treatment for individuals.

Furthermore, faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), administered intragastrically a suspension of fecal samples from a normal individual into a patient intestinal tract to cure the specific disease, is a feasible strategy [67]. However, FMT is still only offering us a modified selective and temporary gut microbiota that depends on both the donor and the recipient to modify the gut microbiota. For patients who suffer from IBD, clinical benefits are still unpredictable. Baxter et al. showed that tumor generation was associated with microbial composition, such as Bacteroides, Parabacteroides, Alistipes, and Akkermansia, as well as several members of Clostridium group XlVa that prevent the growth of tumors based on faecal microbiota transplantation from healthy individuals and patients who suffer from CRC [66].

6. Future Perspective and Conclusions

Although complex processes lead to the development of GI cancers, recent advances have confirmed the importance of microbiota. However, the mechanism of human microbiome in sustaining human health, however, remains unexplained. For example, some conditions, such as IBD, have very robust signatures across populations, while for obesity, the signatures do not apply across other cohorts [68]. So, we must characterize the archetypical organizations of our microbiome in large populations. Whether it is the disorder of microbiome that causes diseases or vice versa, it is certain that microbiome are valuable tools for diagnosis or prognosis, and we should take advantage of microbiome as biomarkers to detect diseases or cancers. Consequently, researchers are studying the mechanism behind the interaction between gut microbiome and disease treatment in order to eventually master the mechanism, which also poses a higher demand for taxonomic level along with various techniques including metabolomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics.

In the future, the gut microbiota may be medically informative. The patients just provide stool samples to send off sequencing and they’ll obtain sufficient information as provided by previous colonoscopy biopsy specimens. Besides, the current drug therapy might be replaced by a new strategy that aims at changing the microbiome in the intestine. Moreover, diet treatment and dietary supplement can also be used to keep the balance of microbiota in intestine to prevent or even cure intestinal illness.

In conclusion, this review mostly introduces the correlation between gut microbiota and gastrointestinal disease as well as its potential treatment. There is still a long way to explore before microbiome-based diagnostics become a routine part of clinical care.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Henry Fok Foundation ; Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, China; Sichuan Provincial Department of Science and Technology, China ; and Sichuan Provincial Department of Education, China 15ZA0001.

References

S. J. D. O'Keefe, “Diet, microorganisms and their metabolites, and colon cancer,” Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 691–706, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. J. M. Watson and P. D. Collins, “Colon cancer: A civilization disorder,” Digestive Diseases, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 222–228, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. H. W. Tang, Z. Wang, B. S. Levison et al., “Intestinal microbial metabolism of phosphatidylcholine and cardiovascular risk,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 368, no. 17, pp. 1575–1584, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. K. Pedersen, V. Gudmundsdottir, H. B. Nielsen et al., “Human gut microbes impact host serum metabolome and insulin sensitivity,” Nature, vol. 535, no. 7612, pp. 376–381, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. L. Sears and W. S. Garrett, “Microbes, microbiota, and colon cancer,” Cell Host & Microbe, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 317–328, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Qin, R. Li, J. Raes et al., “A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing,” Nature, vol. 464, no. 7285, pp. 59–65, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Bäckhed, R. E. Ley, J. L. Sonnenburg, D. A. Peterson, and J. I. Gordon, “Host-bacterial mutualism in the human intestine,” Science, vol. 307, no. 5717, pp. 1915–1920, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Sommer and F. Bäckhed, “The gut microbiota-masters of host development and physiology,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 11, pp. 227–238, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Gueimonde, A. Ouwehand, H. Huhtinen, E. Salminen, and S. Salminen, “Qualitative and quantitative analyses of the bifidobacterial microbiota in the colonic mucosa of patients with colorectal cancer, diverticulitis and inflammatory bowel disease,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 13, no. 29, pp. 3985–3989, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. C. Savage, “Microbial ecology of the gastrointestinal tract,” Annual Review of Microbiology, vol. 31, pp. 107–133, 1977.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Shanahan, “The colonic microbiota in health and disease,” Current Opinion in Gastroenterology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 49–54, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. J. Turnbaugh, R. E. Ley, M. Hamady, C. M. Fraser-Liggett, R. Knight, and J. I. Gordon, “The human microbiome project,” Nature, vol. 449, no. 7164, pp. 804–810, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Osadchiy, C. R. Martin, and E. A. Mayer, “The gut–brain axis and the microbiome: mechanisms and clinical implications,” Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 322–332, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Raman, P. Ambalam, K. K. Kondepudi et al., “Potential of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics for management of colorectal cancer,” Gut Microbes, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 181–192, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. H. Kim and J. H. Cheon, “Pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease and recent advances in biologic therapies,” Immune Network, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 25–40, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Ogura, D. K. Bonen, N. Inohara et al., “A frameshift mutation in NOD2 associated with susceptibility to Crohn's disease,” Nature, vol. 411, no. 6837, pp. 603–606, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. Hugot, M. Chamaillard, H. Zouali et al., “Association of NOD2 leucine-rich repeat variants with susceptibility to Crohn's disease,” Nature, vol. 411, no. 6837, pp. 599–603, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Franchimont, S. Vermeire, H. El Housni et al., “Deficient host-bacteria interactions in inflammatory bowel disease? the toll-like receptor (TLR)-4 Asp299gly polymorphism is associated with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis,” Gut, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 987–992, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Dicksved, J. Halfvarson, M. Rosenquist et al., “Molecular analysis of the gut microbiota of identical twins with Crohn's disease,” The ISME Journal, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 716–727, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Macfarlane, E. Furrie, J. H. Cummings, and G. T. Macfarlane, “Chemotaxonomic analysis of bacterial populations colonizing the rectal mucosa in patients with ulcerative colitis,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 1690–1699, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. Hofer, “Microbiome: Bacterial imbalance in Crohn's disease,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 312-313, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. S. Garrett, C. A. Gallini, T. Yatsunenko et al., “Enterobacteriaceae Act in concert with the gut microbiota to induce spontaneous and maternally transmitted colitis,” Cell Host & Microbe, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 292–300, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Moossavi and F. Bishehsari, “Inflammation in sporadic colorectal cancer,” Archives of Iranian Medicine, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 166–170, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
R. W. Stidham and P. D. R. Higgins, “Colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease,” Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 168–178, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Mattar, “Current management of inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer,” Gastrointestinal Cancer Research, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 53–61, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Nosho, Y. Sukawa, Y. Adachi et al., “Association of Fusobacterium nucleatum with immunity and molecular alterations in colorectal cancer,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 557–566, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Ji, Q. Peng, and M. Wang, “Anti-colon-cancer effects of polysaccharides: A mini-review of the mechanisms,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 114, pp. 1127–1133, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Munro, S. K. Wickremesekera, L. Peng, S. T. Tan, and T. Itinteang, “Cancer stem cells in colorectal cancer: A review,” Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 110–116, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Qu, X. Yuan, J. Zhao et al., “Dietary advanced glycation end products modify gut microbial composition and partially increase colon permeability in rats,” Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, vol. 61, no. 10, Article ID 1700118, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. A. Tappenden and A. S. Deutsch, “The physiological relevance of the intestinal microbiota--contributions to human health,” Journal of the American College of Nutrition, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 679–683, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. S. Plottel and M. J. Blaser, “Microbiome and malignancy,” Cell Host & Microbe, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 324–335, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. R. Rowland, “The role of the gastrointestinal microbiota in colorectal cancer,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 15, no. 13, pp. 1524–1527, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Tjalsma, A. Boleij, J. R. Marchesi, and B. E. Dutilh, “A bacterial driver-passenger model for colorectal cancer: beyond the usual suspects,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 575–582, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. D. Kostic, D. Gevers, C. S. Pedamallu et al., “Genomic analysis identifies association of Fusobacterium with colorectal carcinoma,” Genome Research, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 292–298, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. H. Park, C. S. Eun, and D. S. Han, “Intestinal microbiota, chronic inflammation, and colorectal cancer,” Intestinal Research, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 338–345, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Boleij, E. M. Hechenbleikner, A. C. Goodwin et al., “The bacteroides fragilis toxin gene is prevalent in the colon mucosa of colorectal cancer patients,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 208–215, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Louis, G. L. Hold, and H. J. Flint, “The gut microbiota, bacterial metabolites and colorectal cancer,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 661–672, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Wu, K. J. Rhee, E. Albesiano et al., “A human colonic commensal promotes colon tumorigenesis via activation of T helper type 17 T cell responses,” Nature Medicine, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1016–1022, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. P. McNulty, M. Wu, A. R. Erickson et al., “Effects of diet on resource utilization by a model human gut microbiota containing bacteroides cellulosilyticus WH2, a symbiont with an extensive glycobiome,” PLoS Biology, vol. 11, no. 8, Article ID e1001637, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
F. E. Rey, M. D. Gonzalez, J. Cheng, M. Wu, P. P. Ahern, and J. I. Gordon, “Metabolic niche of a prominent sulfate-reducing human gut bacterium,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 33, pp. 13582–13587, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Desai, A. M. Seekatz, N. M. Koropatkin et al., “A dietary fiber-deprived gut microbiota degrades the colonic mucus barrier and enhances pathogen susceptibility,” Cell, vol. 167, no. 5, pp. 1339–1353, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Krisanaprakornkit, J. R. Kimball, A. Weinberg, R. P. Darveau, B. W. Bainbridge, and B. A. Dale, “Inducible expression of human beta-defensin 2 by Fusobacterium nucleatum in oral epithelial cells: multiple signaling pathways and role of commensal bacteria in innate immunity and the epithelial barrier,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 2907–2915, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Flemer, R. D. Warren, M. P. Barrett et al., “The oral microbiota in colorectal cancer is distinctive and predictive,” Gut, vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 1454–1463, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Komiya, Y. Shimomura, T. Higurashi et al., “Patients with colorectal cancer have identical strains of Fusobacterium nucleatum in their colorectal cancer and oral cavity,” Gut, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
S. H. Wong, T. N. Y. Kwong, T.-C. Chow et al., “Quantitation of faecal Fusobacterium improves faecal immunochemical test in detecting advanced colorectal neoplasia,” Gut, vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 1441–1448, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Zou, L. Fang, and M.-H. Lee, “Dysbiosis of gut microbiota in promoting the development of colorectal cancer,” Gastroenterology Report, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Xu and B. Jiang, “Analysis of mucosa-associated microbiota in colorectal cancer,” Medical Science Monitor, vol. 23, pp. 4422–4430, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. V. Almeida, M. R. Camargo, E. Russo, and A. Amedei, “Role of diet and gut microbiota on colorectal cancer immunomodulation,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 151–162, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Haenszel, “A case-control study of large bowel cancer in Japan,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 17–22, 1980.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Larsen, F. K. Vogensen, F. W. J. van den Berg et al., “Gut microbiota in human adults with type 2 diabetes differs from non-diabetic adults,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 2, Article ID e9085, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Wen, R. E. Ley, P. Y. Volchkov et al., “Innate immunity and intestinal microbiota in the development of Type 1 diabetes,” Nature, vol. 455, no. 7216, pp. 1109–1113, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. J. Turnbaugh, F. Bäckhed, L. Fulton, and J. I. Gordon, “Diet-induced obesity is linked to marked but reversible alterations in the mouse distal gut microbiome,” Cell Host & Microbe, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 213–223, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Bingham and E. Riboli, “Diet and cancer - The European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 206–215, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. H. Reikvam, A. Erofeev, A. Sandvik et al., “Depletion of murine intestinal microbiota: effects on gut mucosa and epithelial gene expression,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 3, Article ID e17996, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. S. L. Chong, “A potential role of probiotics in colorectal cancer prevention: review of possible mechanisms of action,” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 351–374, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Rossi, S. S. Mirbagheri, A. Keshavarzian, and F. Bishehsari, “Nutraceuticals in colorectal cancer: A mechanistic approach,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 833, pp. 396–402, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. R. Pandey, S. R. Naik, and B. V. Vakil, “Probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics- a review,” Journal of Food Science and Technology, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 7577–7587, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Sivan, L. Corrales, N. Hubert et al., “Commensal Bifidobacterium promotes antitumor immunity and facilitates anti-PD-L1 efficacy,” Science, vol. 350, no. 6264, pp. 1084–1089, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Manuzak, T. Hensley-McBain, A. S. Zevin et al., “Enhancement of microbiota in healthy macaques results in beneficial modulation of mucosal and systemic immune function,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 196, no. 5, pp. 2401–2409, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Hendler and Y. Zhang, “Probiotics in the treatment of colorectal cancer,” Medicines, vol. 5, no. 3, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Mego, J. Chovanec, I. Vochyanova-Andrezalova et al., “Prevention of irinotecan induced diarrhea by probiotics: a randomized double blind, placebo controlled pilot study,” Complementary Therapies in Medicine, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 356–362, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Váradi, J. L. Luo, D. E. Hibbs et al., “Methods for the detection and identification of pathogenic bacteria: Past, present, and future,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 46, no. 16, pp. 4818–4832, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Castellarin, R. L. Warren, J. D. Freeman et al., “Fusobacterium nucleatum infection is prevalent in human colorectal carcinoma,” Genome Research, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 299–306, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Cho and M. J. Blaser, “The human microbiome: at the interface of health and disease,” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 260–270, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Suen, J. J. Scott, F. O. Aylward et al., “An insect herbivore microbiome with high plant Biomass-degrading capacity,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 6, no. 9, Article ID e1001129, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. T. Baxter, J. P. Zackular, G. Y. Chen, and P. D. Schloss, “Structure of the gut microbiome following colonization with human feces determines colonic tumor burden,” Microbiome, vol. 2, no. 1, article no 20, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
O. C. Aroniadis and L. J. Brandt, “Intestinal microbiota and the efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation in gastrointestinal disease,” Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 230–237, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
W. A. Walters, Z. Xu, and R. Knight, “Meta-analyses of human gut microbes associated with obesity and IBD,” FEBS Letters, vol. 588, no. 22, pp. 4223–4233, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Yu, Q. Feng, S. H. Wong et al., “Metagenomic analysis of faecal microbiome as a tool towards targeted non-invasive biomarkers for colorectal cancer,” Gut, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 70–78, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Tsoi, E. S. H. Chu, X. Zhang et al., “Peptostreptococcus anaerobius induces intracellular cholesterol biosynthesis in colon cells to induce proliferation and causes dysplasia in mice,” Gastroenterology, vol. 152, no. 6, pp. 1419–1433.e5, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Wang, T. D. Allen, R. J. May, S. Lightfoot, C. W. Houchen, and M. M. Huycke, “Enterococcus faecalis induces aneuploidy and tetraploidy in colonic epithelial cells through a bystander effect,” Cancer Research, vol. 68, no. 23, pp. 9909–9917, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Wang and M. M. Huycke, “Extracellular superoxide production by enterococcus faecalis promotes chromosomal instability in mammalian cells,” Gastroenterology, vol. 132, no. 2, pp. 551–561, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Mima et al., “Fusobacterium nucleatum and T cells in colorectal carcinoma,” JAMA Oncol, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 653–661, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Cuevas-Ramos, C. R. Petit, I. Marcq, M. Boury, E. Oswald, and J. Nougayrede, “Escherichia coli induces DNA damage in vivo and triggers genomic instability in mammalian cells,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 25, pp. 11537–11542, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. J. Shen, J. F. Rawls, T. A. Randall et al., “Molecular characterization of mucosal adherent bacteria and associations with colorectal adenomas,” Gut Microbes, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 138–147, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Nakatsu, X. Li, H. Zhou et al., “Gut mucosal microbiome across stages of colorectal carcinogenesis,” Nature Communications, vol. 6, no. 1, Article ID 8727, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Boleij, M. M. H. J. van Gelder, D. W. Swinkels, and H. Tjalsma, “Clinical importance of Streptococcus gallolyticus infection among colorectal cancer patients: systematic review and meta-analysis,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 870–878, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. K. Wentling, P. P. Metzger, E. J. Dozois, H. K. Chua, and M. Krishna, “Unusual bacterial infections and colorectal carcinoma--Streptococcus bovis and Clostridium septicum: report of three cases,” Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 1223–1227, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. R. Marchesi, B. E. Dutilh, N. Hall et al., “Towards the human colorectal cancer microbiome,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 5, Article ID e20447, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2019 Fanli Kong and Yi Cai. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

2702

Downloads

1667

Citations