Research Article

The Change of Laboratory Tests Could Be Predictive Factors for Infection after McKeown Esophagogastrectomy

Table 2

Difference in perioperative features among patients who underwent McKeon esophagogastrectomy.

OutcomeInfection group (%)Noninfection group (%)Statistic (χ2 or value) value

Total no. of patients72286
Hoarseness12.282<0.001
Yes17 (23.6)25 (8.7)
No55 (76.4)261 (91.3)
Poor coughing ability70.967<0.001
Yes37 (51.4)26 (9.1)
No35 (48.6)260 (90.9)
Wound pain0.0500.823
Yes14 (19.4)59 (20.6)
No58 (80.6)227 (79.4)
Chest pain/chest distress0.2900.590
Yes1 (1.4)2 (0.7)
No71 (98.6)284 (99.3)
Heart rate3.5860.058
<100/min16 (22.2)7 (2.4)
≤100/min56 (77.8)279 (97.6)
Respiratory rate0.5670.451
<24/min3 (4.2)7 (2.4)
≤ 24/min69 (95.8)279 (97.6)
Atrial fibrillation0.0000.993
Yes2 (2.8)8 (2.8)
No70 (97.2)278 (97.2)
MAP90.20 ± 9.8389.83 ± 10.33−0.2810.779

Statistically significant at . MAP: Mean artery pressure