Research Article
Body Fat Evaluation in Male Athletes from Combat Sports by Comparing Anthropometric, Bioimpedance, and Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Measurements
Table 3
Correlation between existing anthropometric equations and DXA-derived estimates of assessing body fat percentage in male athletes from combat sports.
| Anthropometric vs. DXA | | |
| Stewart et al. | 0.876 | <0.001 | Civar et al. | 0.834 | <0.001 | Reilly et al. | 0.899 | <0.001 | Oliver et al. | 0.907 | <0.001 | Evans et al. 2 | 0.907 | <0.001 | Evans et al. 1 | 0.905 | <0.001 | Withers et al. | 0.890 | <0.001 | Thorland et al. 2 | 0.840 | <0.001 | Thorland et al. 1 | 0.906 | <0.001 | White et al. | 0.887 | <0.001 | Forsyth and Sinning 4 | 0.886 | <0.001 | Forsyth and Sinning 3 | 0.852 | <0.001 | Forsyth and Sinning 2 | 0.877 | <0.001 | Forsyth and Sinning 1 | 0.848 | <0.001 | Zuti and Golding | 0.569 | <0.001 | Faulkner | 0.904 | <0.001 | Yuhasz | 0.909 | <0.001 |
|
|