Body Fat Evaluation in Male Athletes from Combat Sports by Comparing Anthropometric, Bioimpedance, and Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Measurements

Table 4

Median values of body fat percentages measured with DXA and BIA and estimated by anthropometric equations.

Method	Median (25^th-75^th percentile)
DXA	15.80 (12.70-19.45)
BIA	10.50 (7.45-13.35)
Stewart et al.	10.50 (6.95-15.80)
Civar et al.	13.00 (10.85-16.65)
Reilly et al.	11.60 (10.10-13.90)
Oliver et al.	12.70 (10.55-16.35)
Evans et al. 2	10.90 (8.90-14.25)
Evans et al. 1	10.80 (8.85-14.30)
Withers et al.	13.5 (11.00-17.05)
Thorland et al. 2	9.40 (6.60-12.25)
Thorland et al. 1	11.30 (7.90-16.80)
White et al.	9.70 (7.25-12.60)
Forsyth and Sinning 4	11.90 (8.40-18.05)
Forsyth and Sinning 3	11.80 (8.80-18.50)
Forsyth and Sinning 2	12.00 (8.30-19.25)
Forsyth and Sinning 1	11.80 (8.40-19.10)
Zuti and Golding	18.00 (15.45-21.35)
Faulkner	12.50 (10.80-14.80)
Yuhasz	18.00 (15.45-21.35)

BIA: bioelectrical impedance; DXA: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; : Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient; : statistical significance; .