Review Article

Implication of Mitochondrial Cytoprotection in Human Islet Isolation and Transplantation

Table 3

Advantages and disadvantages of mitochondria-based islet potency and viability assays.

AssaysAdvantagesDisadvantagesReferences

Newport Green + TMRE(i) Low toxicity of Newport Green Dye
(ii) β-cell specific
(iii) Correlates with in vivo islet function
(i) Islet dissociation needed
(ii) Nonstimulated static assay
(iii) Complex instrumentation and setup required
(iv) Difficult to quantify MMP
(v) Not real time
[99, 100]

FluoZin-3 + TMRE(i) β-cell specific
(ii) FluoZin-3 has higher affinity (KD= 15 nM) for
 Zinc and higher quantum yield
(i) No correlation has been demonstrated with in
vitro and in vivo islet function
(ii) Nonstimulated static assay
(iii) Complex equipment requirement and setup
(iv) Difficult to quantify MMP
(v) Not real time
[101, 102]

JC-1 + ROS(i) Multiparametric assay
(ii) Strong correlation of MMP with ROS
(iii) Dynamic ROS assay
(iv) Correlate with in vivo function
(i) Non β-cell specific
(ii) Non-stimulated static assay of MMP
(iii) Procedure complexity
(iv) Intact islet assay for ROS but need islet
dissociation for MMP
(v) Not real time
[88, 103]

Multiparametric microfluidic assay (Rh123 + Fura-2AM + insulin kinetics)(i) Multiparametric assay of key  stimulus-secretion coupling factors (MMP:
 Rh123, Ca2+: Fura-2AM; Insulin: ELISA)
(ii) Dynamic response to stimulator
(iii) Intact islets
(iv) Real time
(v) High throughput
(i) Large-scale evaluation needed
(ii) Moderate spatiotemporal resolution of the
 measured parameters
[104, 105]