About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Biotechnology Research International
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 973851, 9 pages
Review Article

Advances in Neuroscience and the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention

Wellcome Trust Dual-Use Bioethics Group, Bradford Disarmament Research Centre, Department of Peace Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK

Received 1 June 2010; Accepted 25 August 2010

Academic Editor: Maxim Golovkin

Copyright © 2011 Malcolm Dando. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. The text of the Convention, http://www.opbw.org/.
  2. The text of the Final Declarations, http://www.opbw.org/.
  3. World Health Organization, Public Health Response to Biological and Chemical Weapons: WHO Guidance, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2004.
  4. Secretariat, “Background Paper on New Scientific and Technological Developments Relevant to the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction,” BWC/CONF.V/4/Add. 1. United Nations, Geneva, Switzerland, October 2001.
  5. Committee on Advances in Technology and the Prevention of their Application to Next Generation Biowarfare Threats, Globalization, Biosecurity and the Future of the Life Sciences, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2006.
  6. The further information provided in slide 8 of Lecture 17 of the Education Module Resource, http://www.dual-usebioethics.net/.
  7. Committee on Military and Intellgence Methodology for Emergent Neurophysiological and Cognitive/Neural Science Research in the Next Two Decades, Emerging Cognitive Neuroscience and Related Technologies, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2008.
  8. C. Green, “The potential impact of neuroscience research is greater than previously thought,” Round Table, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  9. S. P. R. Rose, Prospects and Perils of the New Brain Sciences: A Twenty Year Timescale, Royal Society 'Neuropolicy Lab'. Royal Society, London, UK, 2009.
  10. T. Baumgartner, M. Heinrichs, A. Vonlanthen, U. Fischbacher, and E. Fehr, “Oxytocin shapes the neural circuitry of trust and trust adaptation in humans,” Neuron, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 639–650, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  11. S. V. Dhuria, L. R. Hanson, and W. H. Frey II, “Intranasal delivery to the central nervous system: mechanisms and experimental considerations,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 1654–1673, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  12. S. A. Deadwyler, L. Porrino, J. M. Siegel, and R. E. Hampson, “Systemic and nasal delivery of orexin-A (hypocretin-1) reduces the effects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performance in nonhuman primates,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 27, no. 52, pp. 14239–14247, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  13. J. P. P. Robinson, “Difficulties facing the chemical weapons convention,” International Affairs, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 223–239, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Crowley, “Dangerous ambiguities: regulation of riot control agents and incapacitants under the chemical weapons convention,” Bradford Non-Lethal Weapons Research Project Report, October 2009, http://www.dual-usebioethics.net/. View at Google Scholar
  15. C. Rhodes and M. R. Dando, “Options for a scientific advisory panel for the biological weapons convention,” in The Web of Prevention: Biological Weapons, Life Sciences, and the Governance of Research, B. Rappert and C. McLeish, Eds., pp. 95–114, Earthscan, London, UK, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  16. N. Sims, “Next step in remedying the institutional deficit,” in Proceedings of the 30th Workshop of the Pugwash Study Group on Implementation of the CBW Conventions: Preparing for the Seventh BWC Review Conference, Geneva, Switzerland, December 2009.
  17. C. Bell, “Neurons for peace. Take the pledge brain scientists,” New Scientist, no. 2746, February 2010, http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20527465.900-neurons-for-peace-take-the-pledge-brain-scientists.html.