Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: Invasive versus Non-Invasive Methods—A Review

Table 2

Comparison of microtransducer ICP monitoring devices.

	Technology	Rate of infection	Rate of hemorrhaging	Technical errors	Zero drift
Camino ICP Monitor	Fiber optic	8,5% [74]	2,50% (0,66% clinical significant) [74]	4,5% [74]	Mean 7,3 ± 5,1 mmHg (range −17 to 21 mmHg) [74]
		4,75% [76]	1,1% [76]	10% [75]	Mean −0,67 mmHg (range −13 to 22 mmHg) [75]
				3,14% [76]	Mean 3,5 ± 3,1 mmHg (range 0 to 12 mmHg) [84]
Codman MicroSensor	Strain gauge	0% [77]	0% [76]	n/a	Mean 0,9 ± 0,2 mmHg (range −5 to 4 mmHg) [78]
		0% [78]	~0,3% (0% clinical significant) [78]		Mean 0,1 ± 1,6 mmHg/100 hours of monitoring [80]
					Mean 2,0 mmHg (range −6 to 15 mmHg) [87]
Raumedic Neurovent-P ICP sensor	Strain gauge	0% [79]	2,02% (0% clinical significant) [79]	n/a	Mean 0,8 ± 2,2 mmHg (range −4 to +8 mmHg) [79]
					1,7 ± 1,36 mmHg (range −2 to 3 mmHg) [84]
					In vitro: 0,6 ± 0,96 mmHg (range 0 to 2 mmHg) [88]
Pressio	Strain gauge	n/a	n/a	n/a	Mean −0,7 ± 1,6 mmHg/100 hours of monitoring [80]
					In vitro: 7-day drift <0,05 mmHg [89]
Spiegelberg	Pneumatic	0% [81]	0% [81]	3,45% [81]	Mean < ± 2 mmHg [81]