Review Article
Outcomes of Chronic Hemodialysis Patients in the Intensive Care Unit
Table 1
Comparison of studies assessing outcomes of chronic dialysis patients admitted to ICU.
| Study | Country | Year of publication | No. of patients () | Mean age (years) | Mean severity score on admission to ICU | ICU mortality (%) | Hospital mortality (%) | 30-day mortality (%) | ICU LOS (days) mean ± SD or median range | ICU readmission rate (%) |
|
Clermont et al. [8] | USA | 2002 | 57 | 58 | 64 (APACHE III) | 11 | 14 | — | | — | Uchino et al. [5] | Australia | 2003 | 38 | 45 | 22 (APACHE II) | 22 | 38 | — | 6 | — | Dara et al. [10] | USA | 2004 | 93 | 66 | 64 (APACHE III) | 9 | 16 | 22 | 2 | — | Manhes et al. [7] | France | 2005 | 92 | 63 | 49.4 (SAPS II) | 28 | 38 | — | | — | Bagshaw et al. [20] | Canada | 2006 | 92 | 66 | 29.7 (APACHE II) | 16 | 34 | — | — | — | Hutchison et al. [4] | UK | 2007 | 3420 | 57 | 24.7 (APACHE II) | 26 | 45 | — | 1.9 [0.9–4.2] | 9 |
Ostermann and Chang [19] | UK/Germany | 2008 | 797 | 55 | 8 (SOFA) | 21 | 35 | — | 2 [1–64] | — | Senthuran et al. [11] | Australia | 2008 | 70 | 57 | 26.1 (APACHE II) | 17 | 29 | — | 2 [1–27] | — | Strijack et al. [6] | Canada | 2009 | 619 | 62 | 24 (APACHE II) | — | 16 | — | 4.3 | 12 | Chapman et al. [18] | UK | 2009 | 199 | 59 | 27.6 (APACHE II) | 44 | 56 | — | | — | Rocha et al. [14] | Brazil | 2009 | 54 | 66 | 43.9 (SAPS II) | 20 | 24 | — | 5 [3–11] | — | Juneja et al. [13] | India | 2010 | 73 | 54 | 27.1 (APACHE II) | 27 | — | 41 | 2 [1–20] | — | Sood et al. [15] | Canada | 2011 | 578 | 61 | 19 (APACHE II, renal adjusted) | 13 | — | — | — | — | Walcher et al. [22] | USA | 2011 | 28 | 58 | — | 36 | 39 | 39 | 9 ± 8 | — | O’Brien et al. [21] | UK | 2012 | 8991 | 59 | 24.6 (APACHE II) | 24 | 42 | — | 2 [0.9–4.7 | — |
|
|
Abbreviations: APACHE: Acute Physiology Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation; SOFA: sequential organ failure assessment; SAPS: Simplified Acute Physiology Score; ICU: intensive care unit; LOS: length of stay.
|