Copyright © 2012 Paul R. Bruening et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

1. S. A. Graham, D. Poulin-Dubois, and R. K. Baker, “Infants' disambiguation of novel object words,” First Language, vol. 18, no. 53, pp. 149–164, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
2. S. Carey and E. Bartlett, “Acquiring a single new word,” Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, vol. 15, pp. 17–29, 1978.
3. E. M. Markman, “Constraints children place on word meanings,” Cognitive Science, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 57–77, 1990. View at Scopus
4. A. E. Booth and S. R. Waxman, “Shape bias special section: taking stock as theories of word learning take shape,” Developmental Science, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 185–194, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
5. E. M. Markman, J. L. Wasow, and M. B. Hansen, “Use of the mutual exclusivity assumption by young word learners,” Cognitive Psychology, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 241–275, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
6. E. M. Markman, Categorization and Naming in Children: Problems of Induction, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1989.
7. R. M. Golinkoff, K. Hirsh-Pasek, L. M. Bailey, and N. R. Wenger, “Young children and adults use lexical principles to learn new nouns,” Developmental Psychology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 99–108, 1992. View at Scopus
8. E. V. Clark, “On the pragmatics of contrast,” Journal of child language, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 417–431, 1990. View at Scopus
9. G. Diesendruck and L. Markson, “Children's avoidance of lexical overlap: a pragmatic account,” Developmental Psychology, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 630–641, 2001. View at Scopus
10. D. Jurafsky, “Universal tendencies in the semantics of the diminutive,” Language, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 533–578, 1996. View at Scopus
11. V. Kempe, P. J. Brooks, and L. Pirott, “How can child-directed speech facilitate the acquisition of morphology?” in Research on Child Language Acquisition: Proceedings of the 8th conference of the International Association for the Study of Child Language, M. Almgren, A. Barrena, M. J. Ezeizabarrena, I. Idiazabal, and B. MacWhinney , Eds., pp. 1237–1247, Cascadilla Press, Medford, Mass, USA, 2001.
12. G. Melzi and K. A. King, “Spanish diminutives in mother-child conversations,” Journal of Child Language, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 281–304, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
13. S. Gillis, “The acquisition of diminutives in Dutch,” in Studies in Pre- and Protomorphology, W. Dressler, Ed., pp. 165–179, Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Vienna, Austria, 1997.
14. I. Savickienė, The Acquisition of Lithuanian Noun Morphology, Verlag der Ősterreichschen Akademie der Wissenschaft en, Wien, Austria, 2003.
15. I. Savickienė and W. U. Dressler, Acquisition of Diminutives: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007.
16. V. Kempe, P. J. Brooks, N. Mironova, A. Pershukova, and O. Fedorova, “Playing with word endings: morphological variation in the learning of Russian noun inflections,” British Journal of Developmental Psychology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 55–77, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
17. K. King and G. Melzi, “Intimacy, imitation and language learning: Spanish diminutives in mother-child conversation,” First Language, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 241–261, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
18. J. M. Hupp, V. M. Sloutsky, and P. W. Culicover, “Evidence for a domain-general mechanism underlying the suffixation preference in language,” Language and Cognitive Processes, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 876–909, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
19. W. E. Merriman and J. M. Schuster, “Young children's disambiguation of object name reference,” Child development, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 1288–1301, 1991. View at Scopus
20. L. H. Jarvis, W. E. Merriman, M. Barnett, J. Hanba, and K. S. Van Haitsma, “Input that contradicts young children’s strategy for mapping novel words affects their phonological and semantic interpretation of other novel words,” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 392–406, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
21. S. A. Kuczaj, “Evidence for a language learning strategy: on the relative ease of acquisition of prefixes and suffixes,” Child Development, vol. 50, pp. 1–13, 1979.
22. M. Mithun, “The acquisition of polysynthesis,” Journal of Child Language, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 285–312, 1989. View at Scopus
23. D.I. Slobin, “Cognitive pre-requisites for the acquisition of grammar,” in Studies of Child Language Development, C. A Ferguson and D. I. Slobin , Eds., Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, NY, USA, 1973.
24. E. Sapir, Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech, Harcourt, Brace & Co., New York, NY, USA, 1921.
25. J. A. Hawkins and G. Gilligan, “Prefixing and suffixing universals in relation to basic word order,” Lingua, vol. 74, no. 2-3, pp. 219–259, 1988. View at Scopus
26. N. Grandi and F. Montermini, “Prefix suffix neutrality in evaluative morphology,” in Morphology and Linguistic Typology, On-line Proceedings of the Fourth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM4), University of Bologna, Catania, Italy, September 2003, http://morbo.lingue.unibo.it/mmm/.
27. W. A. Bagley, “The apperception of the spoken sentence: a study in the psychology of language,” American Journal of Psychology, vol. 12, pp. 80–130, 1900.
28. W. D. Marslen-Wilson, “Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition,” Cognition, vol. 25, no. 1-2, pp. 71–102, 1987. View at Scopus
29. W. D. Marslen-Wilson and A. Welsh, “Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech,” Cognitive Psychology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 29–63, 1978. View at Scopus
30. S. Nooteboom, “Lexical retrieval from fragments of spoken words: beginnings vs. endings,” Journal of Phonetics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 407–424, 1981.
31. A. C. Walley, “Young children's detections of word-initial and -final mispronunciations in constrained and unconstrained contexts,” Cognitive Development, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 145–167, 1987. View at Scopus
32. M. C. S. Clair, P. Monaghan, and M. Ramscar, “Relationships between language structure and language learning: the suffixing preference and grammatical categorization,” Cognitive Science, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1317–1329, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
33. M. Merkx, K. Rastle, and M. H. Davis, “The acquisition of morphological knowledge investigated through artificial language learning,” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 1200–1220, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
34. G. O. Deák and M. Maratsos, “On having complex representations of things: preschoolers use multiple words for objects and people,” Developmental Psychology, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 224–240, 1998. View at Scopus
35. G. O. Deák, L. Yen, and J. Pettit, “By any other name: when will preschoolers produce several labels for a referent?” Journal of Child Language, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 787–804, 2001. View at Scopus
36. C. B. Mervis, R. M. Golinkoff, and J. Bertrand, “Two-year-olds readily learn multiple labels for the same basic-level category,” Child Development, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 1163–1177, 1994. View at Scopus
37. D. Crepaldi, K. Rastle, C. J. Davis, and S. J. Lupker, “Seeing stems everywhere: position-independent identification of stem morphemes,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. In press. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
38. D. Crepaldi, K. Rastle, and C. J. Davis, “Morphemes in their place: evidence for position-specific identification of suffixes,” Memory and Cognition, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 312–321, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
39. E. Fudge, English Word-Stress, George Allen & Unwin, London, UK, 1984.