About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Child Development Research
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 467872, 9 pages
Research Article

What Makes an Act a Pretense One? Young Children’s Pretend-Real Judgments and Explanations

1Department of Psychology, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON, Canada M5B 2K3
2Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 400400, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4400, USA

Received 16 January 2013; Accepted 19 March 2013

Academic Editor: Tricia Striano

Copyright © 2013 Lili Ma and Angeline S. Lillard. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. S. Lillard, “Pretend play skills and the child's theory of mind,” Child development, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 348–371, 1993. View at Scopus
  2. J. Belsky and R. K. Most, “From exploration to play: a cross-sectional study of infant free play behavior,” Developmental Psychology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 630–639, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. I. Bretherton, “Representing the social world in symbolic play: reality and fantasy,” in Symbolic Play: The Development of Social Understanding, I. Bretherton, Ed., pp. 3–41, Academic Press, Orlando, Fla, USA, 1984.
  4. G. G. Fein, “Pretend play in childhood: an integrative review,” Child Development, vol. 52, pp. 1095–1118, 1981.
  5. L. Nicolich, “Beyond sensorimotor intelligence: assessment of symbolic maturity through analysis of pretend play,” Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 89–99, 1977.
  6. W. L. Haight and P. J. Miller, Pretending at Home: Early Development in a Sociocultural Context, SUNY Press, Albany, NY, USA, 1993.
  7. K. L. Walton, Mimesis as Make-Believe, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1990.
  8. A. M. Leslie, “Pretense and representation: the origin of ‘theory of mind’,” Psychological Review, vol. 94, pp. 412–426, 1987.
  9. A. S. Lillard, “Wanting to be it: children's understanding of intentions underlying pretense,” Child Development, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 981–993, 1998. View at Scopus
  10. H. Rakoczy, M. Tomasello, and T. Striano, “Young children know that trying is not pretending: a test of the “behaving-as-if” construal of children's early concept of pretense,” Developmental Psychology, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 388–399, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. M. Sobel, “Children's knowledge of the relation between intentional action and pretending,” Cognitive Development, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 130–141, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. S. Lillard and D. C. Witherington, “Mothers' behavior modifications during pretense and their possible signal value for toddlers,” Developmental Psychology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 95–113, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. P. H. Weiss, M. Jeannerod, Y. Paulignan, and H. J. Freund, “Is the organisation of goal-directed action modality specific? A common temporal structure,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 1136–1147, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Bekoff, “Social communication in canids: evidence for the evolution of a stereotyped mammalian display,” Science, vol. 197, no. 4308, pp. 1097–1099, 1977. View at Scopus
  15. A. S. Lillard, T. Nishida, D. Massaro, A. Vaish, L. Ma, and G. McRoberts, “Signs of pretense across age and scenario,” Infancy, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–30, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. S. DeLoache and B. Plaetzer, “Tea for two: joint mother-child symbolic play,” in Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting for the Society for Research in Child Development, Toronto, Canada, 1985.
  17. R. A. Richert and A. S. Lillard, “Observers' proficiency at identifying pretense acts based on behavioral cues,” Cognitive Development, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 223–240, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. D. Bransford, J. R. Barclay, and J. J. Franks, “Sentence memory: a constructive versus interpretive approach,” Cognitive Psychology, vol. 2, pp. 331–350, 1972.
  19. S.-E. Clausen, Applied Correspondence Analysis: An Introduction, Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA, 1998.
  20. B. S. Everitt, The Analysis of Contingency Tables. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, vol. 4, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Washington, DC, USA, 1992.
  21. R. Baillargeon, “Object permanence in 3 1/2- and 4 1/2-month-old infants,” Developmental Psychology, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 655–664, 1987. View at Scopus
  22. E. S. Spelke, K. Breinlinger, J. Macomber, and K. Jacobson, “Origins of knowledge,” Psychological Review, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 605–632, 1992. View at Scopus
  23. J. H. Flavell, E. R. Flavell, F. Green, and J. E. Korfmacher, “Do young children think of television images as pictures or real objects,” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronics Media, vol. 34, pp. 399–419, 1990.
  24. A. Dorr, “No shortcuts to judging reality,” in Children's Understanding of Television: Research on Attention and Comprehension, J. Bryant and D. R. Anderson, Eds., pp. 199–220, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1983.
  25. C. Hoffner, J. Cantor, and D. M. Badzinski, “Children's understanding of adverbs denoting degree of likelihood,” Journal of child language, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 217–231, 1990. View at Scopus
  26. S. R. Beck, E. J. Robinson, D. J. Carroll, and I. A. Apperly, “Children's thinking about counterfactuals and future hypotheticals as possibilities,” Child Development, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 413–426, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. C. Garvey, Play, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1977.
  28. L. Ma and A. S. Lillard, “Where is the real cheese? Young children's ability to discriminate between real and pretend acts,” Child Development, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 1762–1777, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. L. Ma and A. S. Lillard, “Two-year-olds' understanding of real-pretend contrasts: the case of real versus substitute content,” in Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of Society of Research in Child Development, Boston, Mass, USA, 2007.
  30. S. Carey, Conceptual Change in Childhood, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1985.
  31. A. Gopnik and A. N. Meltzoff, Words, Thoughts, and Theories, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1997.
  32. K. Inagaki and G. Hatano, “Young children's conception of the biological world,” Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 177–181, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. F. C. Keil, “The origins of an autonomous biology,” in Modularity and Constraints in Language and Cognition: The Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology, M. R. Gunnar and M. Maratsos, Eds., vol. 25, pp. 103–137, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1992.
  34. H. M. Wellman and S. A. Gelman, “Cognitive development: foundational theories of core domains,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 337–375, 1992. View at Scopus
  35. L. E. Schulz, E. B. Bonawitz, and T. L. Griffiths, “Can being scared cause tummy aches? Naive theories, ambiguous evidence, and preschoolers' causal inferences,” Developmental Psychology, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1124–1139, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. A. K. Hickling, H. M. Wellman, and G. M. Gottfried, “Preschoolers' understanding of others' mental attitudes towards pretend happenings,” British Journal of Developmental Psychology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 339–354, 1997.