Table 5: Results in engagement when compared stimuli of interest versus activities categorized as non interested by the participant.

Comparison between chosen stimuli of interest versus the stimulus categorized as “Not Interested”Engagement duration, s, Mean difference, CI95% 𝑍 𝑃 valueAttention Mean difference, CI95% 𝑍 𝑃 valueAttitude Mean difference, CI95% 𝑍 𝑃 value

Stimulus category “Not Interested” in Apathetic participants
Versus StimuliGuidance24023.7
Work79 [−11–270]−1.3.2.7[.17–1.2]−2.2.02.8 [−.1–1.8]−1.6.1
Family183 [333–33]−2.5.01.6[.02–1.3]−2.046.8 [.2–1.4]−2.3.03
Leisure260 [117–402]−3.1.0021[.5–1.6]−2.9.0041.4 [1–1.8]−3.1.002
Personal185 [−.5–371]−2.1.03.7[.02–1.4]−2.0461 [.08–2]−2.046
Versus StimuliWithout Guidance18123.7
Work151 [−21–323]−2.2.03.4[.09–.8]−2.3.025.7 [.1–1.5]−1.7.1
Family178 [20–336]−2.5.01.4[.1–.9]−1.5.1.9 [.1–1.6]−2.1.03
Leisure129 [−2–261]−2.2.03.7[.1–1.3]−3.3.0011.3 [.9–1.8]−2.5.01
Personal55 [−4–115]−2.2.03.5[.1–1]−3.2.001.9 [.2–1.6]−2.3.02

Stimulus category “Not Interested” in Non Apathetic participants
Versus StimuliGuidance2372.54.2
Work173 [65–282]−3.8<.001.5 [.2–.9]−2.8.0051.6 [.8–2.3]−3.3.001
Family211 [128–293]−4.1<.001.3 [−.04–.7]−1.7.091.4 [.9–1.4]−3.9<.001
Leisure346 [250–442]−4.4<.001.7 [.3–1.1]−3.0031.6 [1.2–2]−4.2<.001
Personal320 [218–421]−4.1<.001.7 [.3–1]−3.2.0011.5 [1–2]−3.8<.001
Versus StimuliWithout Guidance2522.64.2
Work157 [38–276]−2.2.03.08 [.3–.4]−.5.6.8 [.2–1.4]−2.5.01
Family113 [17–209]−2.5.01.04 [.3–.4]−.2.8.8 [.2–1.3]−2.6.01
Leisure165 [67–264]−3.003.3 [.04–.6]−4.5<.0011.3 [.9–1.8]−3.8<.001
Personal192 [81–303]−3.003.4 [.1–.7]−4.5<.0011.4 [.9–1.9]−3.9<.001

Note: Mean differences are calculated using boostrap method, 𝑃 value are 2 tailed.