Research Article

Comparative Evaluation of the Antidiabetic Effects of Different Parts of Cassia fistula Linn, a Southeast Asian Plant

Table 6

Effect of methanolic and aqueous bark, leaf, and flower extracts of Cassia fistula on serum hepatic enzymes in diabetic rats.

GroupAST (IU)ALT (IU)ALP (IU)

Normal control 9 9 . 2 5 ± 5 . 2 8 3 0 . 0 5 ± 1 . 3 5 7 4 . 6 ± 3 . 5 3
Diabetic control 1 2 8 . 4 ± 4 . 5 2 4 4 . 2 3 ± 1 . 7 0 1 3 2 . 8 ± 2 . 6 9
Glibenclamide (2.5 mg/kg)96.82 ± 2.66c34.11 ± 2.31b80.68 ± 4.16c
BME 250 mg/kg 1 1 0 . 1 ± 4 . 8 6 3 7 . 6 ± 3 . 1 7 94.53 ± 2.74c
BAE 250 mg/kg 1 1 9 . 5 ± 5 . 8 4 3 8 . 2 5 ± 2 . 6 2 112.6 ± 3.17b
BME 500 mg/kg100.8 ± 3.61b34.56 ± 1.26a85.43 ± 2.93c
BAE 500 mg/kg 1 1 9 . 8 ± 5 . 8 4 3 7 . 1 8 ± 2 . 5 0 96.25 ± 3.34c
LME 250 mg/kg 1 2 2 . 9 ± 5 . 9 3 3 8 . 7 9 ± 1 . 5 4 100.1 ± 4.05c
LAE 250 mg/kg 1 2 2 . 1 ± 5 . 2 7 4 0 . 5 3 ± 1 . 2 5 1 2 3 . 1 ± 3 . 1 5
LME 500 mg/kg 1 1 7 . 5 ± 5 . 8 4 35.85 ± 2.54a89.27 ± 3.03c
LAE 500 mg/kg 1 2 1 . 1 ± 4 . 1 8 3 9 . 2 2 ± 1 . 4 9 118.1 ± 2.79a
FME 250 mg/kg124 ± 4.87 3 9 . 1 4 ± 2 . 6 2 1 2 5 . 7 ± 3 . 5 7
FAE 250 mg/kg 1 2 4 . 3 ± 4 . 7 9 4 0 . 7 ± 1 . 2 7 1 2 6 . 4 ± 2 . 9 8
FME 500 mg/kg 1 2 0 . 4 ± 5 . 3 9 3 8 . 1 3 ± 1 . 4 0 108.4 ± 5.32c
FAE 500 mg/kg 1 2 2 . 5 ± 5 . 8 4 3 9 . 5 2 ± 1 . 1 3 1 2 2 . 9 ± 3 . 3 8

Values are mean ± SEM ( 𝑛 = 6 ).
𝑃 value: a < 0.05, b < 0.01, c < 0.001 as compared with diabetic control group (by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test).