Cholesterol / 2011 / Article / Tab 1 / Review Article
The Effects of Very-Low-Calorie Diets on HDL: A Review Table 1 Studies investigating the use of VLCD only.
Study N Number of males Intervention Duration of intervention Weight at baseline (Kg) Weight at end of intervention (Kg) HDL at baseline (mmol/L) HDL at end of intervention (mmol/L) Clément et al. [13 ] 21 0 800 kcal/d 28 days 94 (3.0) 88 (3.0)* 1.05 (0.04) 0.9 (0.03) Clément et al. [13 ] 8 0 650 kcal/d 2 days 120 (7.7) 119 (8) 1.4 (0.2) — Haugaard et al. [14 ] 13 4 600–800 kcal/d 8 weeks 106.4 (SE: 4.1) 97.0 (SE: 4.3)* 1.3 (SE: 0.1) 1.2 (SE: 0.1)* Hong et al. [12 ] 152 0 Black participants 500–800 kcal/d + BT + exercise. 12 weeks 105 (21) 95 (28)* 1.45 (0.39) 1.34 (0.39)* Hong et al. [12 ] 152 0 White participants 500–800 kcal/d + BT + exercise. 12 weeks 104 (28) 94 (25)* 1.50 (0.34) 1.37 (0.34)* Laaksonen et al. [15 ] 20 9 800 kcal/d 9 weeks 101.3 (12.0) 86.4 (9.6)* 1.17 (0.26) 1.22 (0.18) Lin et al. [16 ] 66 24 1200 kcal/d + 450 kcal/d 14 weeks (2 weeks LCD followed by 12 weeks VLCD) 92.5 (14.1)
▵
−8.37 (0.7)*1.09 (0.20)
▵
−0.26 (0.85)Lin et al. [16 ] 66 21 1200 kcal/d + 800 kcal/d 14 weeks (2 weeks LCD followed by 12 weeks VLCD) 92.1 (15.6)
▵
−8.42 (0.7)*1.15 (0.25)
▵
−0.49 (0.85)
All values are reported as means (standard deviation) unless stated otherwise. N: number of participants
*
𝑃
<
.
0
5
compared to baseline
Δ
Values reported as change SE: standard error.