- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 571846, 12 pages
Immune Response to Lipoproteins in Atherosclerosis
1Department of Molecular Immunology, Thrombosis Research Institute, Narayana Hrudayalaya Hospital, 258/A, Bommasandra Industrial Area, Bangalore 560099, India
2Scientific Chairman, Thrombosis Research Institute, London, UK
Received 4 June 2012; Accepted 24 July 2012
Academic Editor: Michael Ibrahim
Copyright © 2012 Sonia Samson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Atherosclerosis, the underlying cause of cardiovascular disease, is characterized by chronic inflammation and altered immune response. Cholesterol is a well-known risk factor associated with the development of cardiovascular diseases. Elevated serum cholesterol is unique because it can lead to development of atherosclerosis in animals and humans even in the absence of other risk factors. Modifications of low-density lipoproteins mediated by oxidation, enzymatic degradation, and aggregation result in changes in their function and activate both innate and adaptive immune system. Oxidized low-density lipoprotein (LDL) has been identified as one of the most important autoantigens in atherosclerosis. This escape from self-tolerance is dependent on the formation of oxidized phospholipids. The emerging understanding of the importance of immune responses against oxidized LDL in atherosclerosis has focused attention on the possibility of development of novel therapy for atherosclerosis. This review provides an overview of immune response to lipoproteins and the fascinating possibility of developing an immunomodulatory therapy for atherosclerosis.
Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading cause of global morbidity and mortality. As per the WHO estimates 17.3 million people died of CVD in 2008 representing almost 30% of global mortality. It is estimated that this number will rise to 23.6 million by 2030 with almost 80% of the death occurring in low and middle income countries. The most important risk factors of heart disease and stroke are unhealthy diet, physical inactivity, tobacco use, and harmful use of alcohol. These result in raised blood pressure, raised levels of glucose and lipids in blood, overweight, and obesity which constitute the metabolic syndrome .
Higher level of cholesterol in blood has traditionally been considered as established risk factors for CVD. However, increased total cholesterol concentrations in plasma do not accurately predict the risk of coronary heart disease as it includes the sum of all cholesterol carried not only by atherogenic lipoproteins, that is, very low-density lipoprotein [VLDL], low-density lipoprotein [LDL], and intermediate-density lipoprotein [IDL], but also by antiatherogenic lipoproteins, that is, high-density lipoprotein, [HDL]. It is also known that the small, dense LDL cholesterol is more atherogenic than large, buoyant particles, and oxidation of LDL increases its atherogenicity. The relationship between LDL cholesterol and risk for CVD is well established, and measurement of LDL is routinely used for risk assessment, as well as risk management . Over the last four decades, significant progress has been made towards the prevention of CVD, primarily by the use of statins which result in lowering the cholesterol levels. However, the increasing epidemic of metabolic syndrome and Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has slown down this progress. Although the use of statins has accounted for the significant reduction in the morbidity and mortality associated with CVD, the risk is not completely eliminated despite effective lipid-lowering treatment . It is estimated that the current therapies prevent only 30% of clinical events, suggesting an urgent need for newer therapeutic strategies .
For many years atherosclerosis was believed to be a disease of lipid accumulation in the vessel wall. Extensive research on the pathophysiology of the disease has brought about a paradigm shift in our understanding of CVD, and atherosclerosis is now accepted as a multifactorial, multiphase chronic inflammatory disease with immunological activity at every stage, from initiation to progression and plaque rupture [4–6]. This review will concentrate on immune response to lipoproteins, its role in the development of atherosclerosis, and modulation of immune response to lipoprotein as therapeutic strategy.
2. Immune Response and Atherosclerosis
Atherosclerosis, which manifests itself as acute coronary syndrome, stroke, and peripheral arterial diseases, is a chronic inflammatory disease of the arterial wall . Immune system plays an important role in the development, progression, and the complications associated with atherosclerosis . Both innate and adaptive immune responses are associated with the progression of the disease (Figure 1). The retention of cholesterol in the subendothelial region of the vessel is the central pathogenic event that starts the atherosclerotic lesion formation . Lipids, such as cholesterol and triglycerides, are insoluble in plasma and are carried by lipoproteins that transport them to various tissues, and LDL is normally associated with the apolipoprotein (Apo) B-100. An increase in plasma LDL levels leads to an increased rate of its entry into the intima, and consequently a higher level of LDL is observed in the intimal region . The interaction of positively charged ApoB to negatively charged proteoglycans leads to the retention of ApoB-linked lipoproteins in the vessel wall . These sequestered lipoproteins are susceptible to modification by oxidation, enzymatic cleavage, and aggregation . Immune response to these modified lipoproteins drives the pathogenic evolution of the plaque by releasing proinflammatory mediators leading to a chronic inflammatory reaction. Oxidized LDL induces the formation of foam cells and fatty streaks in the vessel wall which is the hallmark of initiation of atherosclerosis . Macrophages from the host immune system try to clean up cholesterol deposits in arteries, but once they are loaded with the unhealthy form of cholesterol, they get stuck in the arteries, triggering the body’s inflammatory response. These cholesterol-loaded macrophages line the artery wall and become major components of the growing plaque. As the atherosclerotic lesion evolves, other immune inflammatory cells such as T cells, dendritic cells, and mast cells accumulate in the region. Macrophages and dendritic cells are known to contribute to the innate immune response by generating free oxygen radicals, proteases, complement factors and cytokines. Macrophages also produce chemokines including the T-cell attractant CCL5 (RANTES) to attract other immune cells into the growing plaque [13, 14]. A fibrous cap of variable thickness, composed mainly of collagen, covers the lesion, while the shoulder region consists of activated T cells, macrophages, and mast cells . The early fatty streaks develop into a complex lesion consisting of apoptotic and necrotic cells, cell debris, and cholesterol crystals which form the necrotic core over a long period of time . Adaptive immunity recognizes specific epitopes on antigens that are processed and presented by the antigen-presenting cells to the T cells, leading to lymphocyte activation and secretion of cytokines and antigen-specific antibodies. T cells reacting to disease-related antigens such as Ox-LDL, HSP60, bacterial, and viral antigens have been found in the human lesions [16–18] (Figure 1).
3. ProAtherogenic and Atheroprotective Immune Response
Four major subsets of T helper cells are involved in the adaptive immune response: helper T-cell subsets Th1 and Th2, regulatory T cells, and the Th17 cells. The CD8+ T cells promote atherogenesis when activated by foreign antigens, but their precise role in atherogenesis remains unclear as their depletion is not associated with any change in the lesion formation . Th1 cells the induce activation of macrophages, neutrophils, and cytotoxic T lymphocytes and secrete proinflammatory cytokines such as interferon and IL12. They are more prevalent in the lesions of both human and ApoE−/− mice suggesting that atherosclerosis is a Th1-dominant disease [20, 21]. Th2 cells are involved in allergic diseases such as atopic allergy and asthma . Their role in atherosclerosis seems to depend on the stage and site of the disease. Increased concentrations of Th2 cytokines in lymphoid organs and atheroprotective anti-oxLDL IgM antibodies in the serum resulted in a significant reduction in atherosclerotic plaque development . However in mice deficient in IL4, the archetypical Th2 cytokine, atherosclerosis was less severe than in IL4-sufficient mice . Th17 cells produce the proinflammatory cytokine IL17 and promote autoimmune diseases [25, 26]. Significant increase in peripheral Th17 cells, cytokines IL17, IL6 and IL23, and transcription factor RORγ levels was reported in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) when compared to control . A functional imbalance between the Th17/Treg was also reported in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), suggesting a potential role for these cells in plaque destabilization and the onset of ACS.
Treg cells are a subpopulation of T cells specialized in maintaining immune homeostasis and self-tolerance by suppressing pathogenic immune responses. Treg cells are heterogeneous and can be subdivided schematically into two major subsets: natural (n Treg) and induced (i Treg). These cells are characterized by expression of CD25 (a subunit of the IL2 receptor) and CD4, on the surface and intracellular expression of the transcription factor fork head box protein P3 (FoxP3) . Treg cells can inhibit effector T cells by contact-dependent suppression of cell proliferation and downregulate the availability of growth factors to effector T cells by enhanced consumption of IL2, and by inhibiting the effector cell functions through secretion of the anti-inflammatory cytokines TGF-β, IL10, and IL35 . The clinical manifestation of atherosclerosis can be linked to inflammation mediated by the Th1 cells, while Treg cells may be involved in the stabilization of disease. Several review articles have discussed the role of immune response in atherosclerosis in detail [5, 7, 27, 30–41].
4. Immune Response to Lipoproteins in Atherosclerosis
The positive role of lipoproteins in the development of cardiovascular diseases has been reported by several epidemiological studies so much so that atherosclerosis was considered a lipid-mediated disease. A key early step in atherogenesis is the formation of the fatty streak, consisting of a subendothelial collection of foam cells, which are cholesterol-laden macrophages or smooth muscle cells . LDL does not trigger an immune response in its native state. Formation of oxidized phospholipids and aldehyde-modified breakdown fragments of apolipoprotein B-100 (apoB-100) exposes neoantigens which cause a breakdown in self-tolerance and induces inflammatory reactions [43, 44]. Oxidation of LDL generates reactive aldehydes and truncated lipids by cleaving the fatty acid double bonds in phospholipids, triglycerides, and cholesteryl esters . Modified phospholipids such as lysophosphatidyl choline and trimethylamine N-oxide can trigger potent immune response by activating NKT cells, macrophages, and endothelial cells [15, 46, 47]. Oxidative modification of ApoB 100 also causes degradation of ApoB and release of small peptides which increase vascular permeability [48, 49]. Accumulation of monocytes/macrophages, smooth muscle cells, and T cells within the arterial wall in response to proinflammatory molecules constitutes a hallmark of developing plaque . Oxidized LDL (OxLDL) has been identified as one of the most important autoantigens in atherosclerosis. The Activation of both innate and adaptive immune responses against OxLDL is the major cause of inflammation and its pathological consequences [31, 36, 50, 51]. Modified LDL interact with scavenger receptors while OX LDL binds to CD36 receptor on monocytes and macrophages and form foam cells . Foam cells are highly immunogenic and attract the adhesion, migration, and activation of the cells of the immune system thus contributing to the development of the disease.
Antigen-presenting cells take up modified LDL and initiate an adaptive immune response by presenting these antigens to T cells, which proliferate to amplify the immune response . Upon renewed exposure to the specific antigen, these T cells produce cytokines and trigger inflammation.
OxLDL is frequently present in sera of patients with coronary syndrome [53, 54] and also accumulates in atherosclerotic plaques . Apart from the formation of foam cells, OxLDL exhibits a range of proatherogenic properties. It acts as a chemoattractant for circulating monocytes and can stimulate secretion of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 by endothelial cells . It is cytotoxic for endothelial cells cultured in serum-free medium, induces expression of macrophage colony stimulating factor, promotes the differentiation of monocytes to macrophages, attracts T cells into the growing atherosclerotic plaque, induces a wide variety of proinflammatory cytokines in macrophages, increases expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and is also immunogenic [57, 58]. The existence of a preexisting, natural immune response against oxidized LDL phospholipids mediated by IgM produced by B-1-cells has also been identified . Immune complexes formed by modified LDL and corresponding antibodies are potent macrophage activators and direct overexpression of MHC-II, costimulatory molecules, and proinflammatory markers, thus creating an ideal conditions for Th1 activation [56–58]. Activated macrophages also release reactive oxygen radicals, enhancing the opportunity for LDL modification  which increases the immunogenic load, induce a more vigorous antibody response, and increase the formation of LDL immune complexes (Figure 2).
5. Natural Antibodies to Lipoproteins
Natural antibodies are defined as antibodies that are found in normal individuals in the complete absence of any exogenous antigenic stimulation and provide first line of defense against invading pathogens . These antibodies bind to a number of self-antigens such as cell membrane components (phosphtidyl choline, glycolipids, etc.) [59, 60] single-stranded DNA  and cell surface molecules on T-cells such as Thy1 . Many of these self-epitopes are also present on pathogens [63–65]. These natural antibodies are also termed as poly reactive to explain their cross reactivity with multiple self-and- non-self-antigens and are required for the immediate recognition and protection against invading pathogens [59, 66]. Natural antibodies are also involved in the removal of aging and dead cells, their debris, and self-antigens and thus protect from autoimmunity . This role of protection from autoimmunity is very relevant especially under certain pathological conditions that involve increased accumulation of self-antigens such as oxidation specific epitopes during atherosclerosis .
Natural IgM antibodies are predominantly produced by a small subset of long-lived, self-replenishing B cells, termed B-1 cells which exhibit a conserved repertoire . These antibodies are encoded in the germline genome and are not dependent on immunoglobulin gene rearrangement. They have broad specificities, but display low affinities and do not require T-cell stimulation of the B lymphocytes to produce antibodies. Presence of autoantibodies to epitopes of copper-oxidized LDL (Cu-OxLDL) and malondialdehyde-modified LDL (MDA-LDL) has been reported in human and animal models of atherosclerosis [67–69]. Cholesterol-fed ApoE−/− mice were found to have very high autoantibody titers, particularly IgM, to a wide variety of Ox LDL epitopes . B-cell hybridomas generated from these mice revealed that most of these autoantibodies were of IgM isotype, recognized the lipid and ApoB moieties of OxLDL, but not of native LDL, and had a specific recognition for phosphorylcholine group [71, 72]. The prototypic and best-characterized antibody against OxLDL, EO6, is identical to T15, a natural antibody known to recognize phosphorylcholine (PC) expressed as a capsular epitopes on Streptococcus pneumonia  and could also block OxLDL uptake by macrophages. Binder et al. identified the functional role of antiphospholipid antibodies in atherosclerosis by immunizing LDLr−/− mice with heat-inactivated PC containing pneumococci . The pneumococcal immunization was found to induce high titers of anti-OxLDL IgM (predominantly of the T15 clonotype) and significantly reduce atherosclerotic lesion in the aortic sinus. The uptake of OxLDL by macrophages was found to be inhibited by the plasma of immunized mice. In a similar attempt to use PC as a vaccine for atherosclerosis, Caligiuri et al. immunized mice with PC covalently linked to a carrier protein, keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH). Immunized mice showed a 40% reduction in lesions compared to control and sera from PC-KLH-immunized mice decreased, the uptake of OxLDL compared to sera of PBS-immunized mice . Further studies in human revealed that patients recovering from pneumococcal infections contain IgM antibodies to the bacterial polysaccharide that significantly correlated with levels of anti-OxLDL IgM antibodies in the same serum sample. These findings suggest that PC-specific cross-reacting IgMs are also present in humans. Human IgG1 against a specific OxLDL epitope was reported to induce rapid and substantial regression of atherosclerotic lesions, possibly by stimulating lipid efflux and inhibiting macrophage recruitment . These recombinant human atheroprotective antibodies could, thus, represent a novel strategy for rapid regression/stabilization of atherosclerotic lesions.
The mechanism of protection afforded by these antibodies has not been studied in detail so far [76, 77]. Binding of OxLDL by IgM antibodies could potentially neutralize most of their proinflammatory properties, which promote atherogenesis. The formation of circulating immune complexes of these IgMs with OxLDL may have protective properties by preventing LDL from entering vulnerable sites of the artery wall. A number of in vitro studies have suggested that these IgM antibodies block the uptake of OxLDL by macrophages and thus could prevent foam cell formation in vivo . They could prevent the activation of endothelial cells and monocyte binding by apoptotic cells containing oxidized lipids . It is still not clear whether passive therapy with these antibodies alone would be protective. Passive transfer of antiphosphorylcholine monoclonal antibodies reduced atherosclerosis supporting the protective role of natural antibodies . Thus, a number of protective mechanisms have been suggested for natural antibodies; however, the relevance of these mechanisms in vivo is still not very clear.
On the other hand existence of proatherogenic natural antibodies is also a possibility which has not been studied in detail so far, as some B-1 cell-derived IgMs have been shown to play a pathogenic role in intestinal ischemia/reperfusion injury . Understanding the role of natural antibodies in health disease and autoimmunity is likely to open up novel therapeutic approaches for the control of atherosclerosis.
6. Antilipoprotein Antibodies: Friend or Foe?
Antibodies to lipoproteins are exemplary in having both proatherogenic as well as protective function against atherosclerosis (Figure 3).
6.1. Pathogenic Effects of Anti-OxLDL Antibodies
OxLDL frequently presents in the sera of patients with coronary artery disease, and the serum concentrations of circulating oxLDL may correlate with the severity of CAD and acute coronary syndrome [53, 54, 80, 81]. Analysis of several studies suggests that, in humans, the humoral immune response to modified LDL is pathogenic. Adaptive response is known to generate IgG antibodies, and the predominance of IgG over IgM antibodies favors the formation of IgG-containing immune complexes with proinflammatory properties. Immune complexes formed with modified LDL and IgG antibodies have been shown to have significantly stronger proatherogenic and proinflammatory properties than modified LDL itself [82–85]. Atherosclerotic lesions also contain immunoglobulins that specifically recognize OxLDL , and these antibodies are believed to be the most effective parameters for predicting the extent of coronary atherosclerosis . Their presence is also associated with a higher risk for coronary restenosis after coronary angioplasty .
Elevated levels of anti-Ox-LDL antibody are related to hypertension, systemic vacuities, peripheral arterial disease, endothelial dysfunction, atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular disease [69, 84, 85, 87–90]. Anti-OxLDL antibodies can also induce other effects, such as complement activation, and induction of adaptive immune response leading to inflammation. Different subclasses of anti-Ox LDL antibodies with a range of pathogenic effects are reported in humans . IgG1 and IgG3 antibodies have been defined as proinflammatory, based on their ability to activate the complement system by the classical pathway and to interact with Fcγ receptors in phagocytic cells . The involvement of IgG1 and IgG3 antibodies in immune complex disease is also well recognized . However, there are reports showing negative or no correlation between anti-LDL antibodies and atherosclerosis [93, 94]. The measurement of free circulating autoantibodies depends on the magnitude of the antibody response, antibody avidity, and on the amount of antigen present in circulation. Soluble immune complexes are formed by the high-avidity antibodies and circulating Ox-LDL leading to inaccurate estimation of anti-Ox-LDL antibodies in the serum [52, 95].
6.2. Protective Effects of Ox-LDL Antibodies
Anti-Ox-LDL antibodies are present in healthy individuals as well as in patients with atherosclerosis [69, 96]. Several experimental studies in animals using Ox-LDL immunization have shown a positive correlation between high titers of anti-Ox-LDL antibodies and the degree of protection against atherosclerosis [97–100]. Transfer of B cells from atherosclerotic apolipoprotein (Apo) E- knockout mice (ApoE−/−) to young, ApoE−/− mice protected the latter from developing advanced disease . Passive administration of recombinant human antibodies against aldehyde-modified apolipoprotein B-100 peptide sequences was observed to inhibit atherosclerosis in ApoE−/− mice . These antibodies were found to modulate the development of fatty streaks as well as their progression to atherosclerotic plaque . Anti-Ox-LDL antibodies are present in healthy individuals as well as in patients with atherosclerosis [69, 96]. Antibodies to Ox LDL seem to play an important role in regulating the level of OX LDL in human. Circulating antibodies recognizing ox-LDL have been found in children with no risk of CVD, and an inverse correlation was observed between plasma Ox-LDL concentrations with the levels of anti-Ox-LDL antibodies in healthy subjects [103, 104]. In another study anti-Ox-LDL antibody levels were inversely related to the intima-media thickness of the carotid arteries in a healthy population with no clinical signs of atherosclerosis . These studies support the protective function of anti LDL antibodies in atherosclerosis which seem to be native antibodies that neutralize Ox-LDL [104, 105].
These observations raise several pertinent questions; is it possible that different epitopes on Ox-LDL determine its protection or pathogenicity? “Can we use anti-Ox-LDL antibodies for atheroprotection? Can OX-LDL be used as an immunogen for modulation of immune response without having any serious adverse effects? Careful consideration of these aspects will be most essential before they can be taken as candidates for therapeutic intervention.
7. Vaccine against Atherosclerosis
Over the last few years, considerable efforts have been made to develop a vaccine using epitopes from lipoproteins and heat shock proteins [106–110]. Considering atherosclerosis as an autoimmune disease wherein an immune response is triggered against the autoantigens, a vaccine which can restore the tolerance to these antigens would be effective in reducing the inflammatory response. Antigen-specific immune modulation is an attractive approach to prevent chronic inflammatory diseases without affecting the normal immune function of the host. Two self-antigens which have emerged as most important ones are related to LDL and heat shock protein (HSP) . Normally T cells reacting to these antigens should be eliminated by negative selection, in the thymus leading to central tolerance. If oxidation of LDL generates neoantigens, all the T cell clones reactive to these would not be removed during thymic education . Similarly in the case of HSP60, molecular mimicry between HSPs of pathogens and human could trigger autoimmune response leading to chronic inflammation. Peripheral tolerance plays a role in maintaining an immune homeostasis to these self-antigens under normal circumstances. Vaccines against atherosclerosis that are being currently developed are different from traditional vaccines for infectious diseases. An ideal vaccine is aimed at restoring the self-tolerance to autoantigens like LDL and heat shock proteins, reducing the inflammation, and balancing the pro- and anti-atherogenic immune response .
8. Modulation of Immune Response to Lipoproteins
Lipoprotein oxidation and subsequent formation of several new antigenic epitopes renders this molecule highly immunogenic, leading to both humoral and cellular immune response. Moreover LDL is a complex particle composed of a high-molecular-weight protein, apolipoprotein B-100 (ApoB100), neutral and polar lipids, and lipophilic antioxidants. Since the different epitopes of ox-LDL induce atherogenic immune responses, it is an attractive candidate to explore immune modulation. Immunization against Ox-LDL has been shown to reduce atherosclerosis by a number of studies [73, 75, 97, 101, 109, 112–115].
Immunization of hypercholesterolemic rabbits and LDLr−/− mice with both MDA-LDL and Cu-Ox-LDL were found to generate high titers of antibodies and inhibit atherosclerosis development by 40–70%, suggesting an induction of atheroprotective immune response [68, 97, 100, 108]. The mechanism of protection afforded by this immunization is thought to be through IgM antibodies generated against Ox-LDL that are shown to block the uptake of Ox-LDL by CD36 receptors on macrophages, thus reducing foam cell formation . Induction of oral tolerance to Cu-Ox-LDL and MDA-LDL mediated by Treg cells and TGF-β was also reported to attenuate the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis in LDLr−/− mice . Similar effects were also observed on tolerance induction to HSP60 .
The protein sequence of ApoB-100 was studied by Fredrikson et al. to identify potential antigenic epitopes that could have atheroprotective effects . Out of the 302 overlapping 20 amino acid peptides synthesized, few were found to provoke an atheroprotective immune response in hypercholesterolemic mice . Peptide 45, corresponding to the amino acid sequence 661–680 of ApoB100 was found to be one of the most effective atheroprotective peptides . The presence of autoantibodies against this peptide sequence was also shown to be associated with reduced risk for development of myocardial infarction (MI) in humans . Adoptive transfer of splenocytes from immunized mice as well as monoclonal antibody against this peptide was found to passively transfer protection . Treatment with human recombinant IgG1 antibodies against the same epitope ameliorated the existing atherosclerotic lesions in ApoB−/− and LDLr−/− mice. The study also demonstrated reduction in macrophage MCP1 release leading to reduced inflammatory plaques and increased reverse cholesterol transport as a possible mechanism of protection . Recently intranasal immunization with ApoB100 peptides was found to induce protective immune response mediated by antigen-specific Treg and could confer protection against the disease in animal models. Our study showed a synergistic effect of immunization with a combination of ApoB and HSP60 peptides in preventing early atherosclerosis . Molecular mimicry between PC of Ox-LDL and apoptotic cells and that of pneumococcus leading to generation of cross-reactive antibodies which can block uptake of LDL by macrophages has been reported . Thus, immunizations with both ApoB peptides as well as oxidized phospholipids have atheroprotective effects in animal models of diet-induced atherosclerosis.
The search for alternative and more specific ways to reduce the modification of LDL, which would consequently reduce the immune response to modified lipoproteins, has received continued attention from the atherosclerosis research community. Different epitopes on Ox-LDL is shown to determine its protection or pathogenicity by various studies. The possibility of using Ox-LDL as an immunogen for modulation of response without having any serious adverse effects has to be elucidated. Anti-Ox-LDL antibodies with neutralizing activity against modified LDL may be an effective therapeutic molecule and needs to be deliberated carefully. Another important criterion for a vaccine is to elucidate its potential in preventing the progression of an established plaque. Atherosclerosis is a slow progressing disease in human. Traces of fatty streaks are also observed in children though the disease manifests itself at a much later age. Development of a proper clinical protocol, establishment of surrogate markers, and identification of right patient population to study the vaccine efficacy are some of the important criteria to be explored in the development of a therapeutic vaccine. Careful consideration of these aspects will be most essential before they can be taken as candidates for therapeutic intervention.
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the trustees of Thrombosis Research Institute, London and Bangalore, the Tata Social Welfare Trust, India (TSWT/IG/SNB/JP/Sdm), and the Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India (BT/01/CDE/08/07).
- P. Greenland, M. D. Knoll, J. Stamler et al., “Major risk factors as antecedents of fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease events,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 290, no. 7, pp. 891–897, 2003.
- J. I. Cleeman, “Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel III),” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 285, no. 19, pp. 2486–2497, 2001.
- C. Baigent, “Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90 056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins,” The Lancet, vol. 366, no. 9493, pp. 1267–1278, 2005.
- R. Paoletti, A. M. Gotto, and D. P. Hajjar, “Inflammation in atherosclerosis and implications for therapy,” Circulation, vol. 109, no. 23, supplement, pp. III20–III26, 2004.
- G. K. Hansson and P. Libby, “The immune response in atherosclerosis: a double-edged sword,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 508–519, 2006.
- A. A. Cuneo and M. V. Autieri, “Expression and function of anti-inflammatory interleukins: the other side of the vascular response to injury,” Current Vascular Pharmacology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 267–276, 2009.
- G. K. Hansson, “Mechanisms of disease: inflammation, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 352, no. 16, pp. 1685–1695, 2005.
- D. Steinberg, “Atherogenesis in perspective: hypercholesterolemia and inflammation as partners in crime,” Nature Medicine, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 1211–1217, 2002.
- D. C. Schwenke and T. E. Carew, “Initiation of atherosclerotic lesions in cholesterol-fed rabbits. II. Selective retention of LDL vs. selective increases in LDL permeability in susceptible sites of arteries,” Arteriosclerosis, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 908–918, 1989.
- K. Olin-Lewis, R. M. Krauss, M. La Belle et al., “ApoC-III content of apoB-containing lipoproteins is associated with binding to the vascular proteoglycan biglycan,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 1969–1977, 2002.
- T. Hevonoja, M. O. Pentikäinen, M. T. Hyvönen, P. T. Kovanen, and M. Ala-Korpela, “Structure of low density lipoprotein (LDL) particles: basis for understanding molecular changes in modified LDL,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1488, no. 3, pp. 189–210, 2000.
- E. Riley, V. Dasari, W. H. Frishman, and K. Sperber, “Vaccines in development to prevent and treat atherosclerotic disease,” Cardiology in Review, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 288–300, 2008.
- L. Gu, Y. Okada, S. K. Clinton et al., “Absence of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 reduces atherosclerosis in low density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice,” Molecular Cell, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 275–281, 1998.
- L. Boring, J. Gosling, M. Cleary, and I. F. Charo, “Decreased lesion formation in CCR2-/- mice reveals a role for chemokines in the initiation of atherosclerosis,” Nature, vol. 394, no. 6696, pp. 894–897, 1998.
- G. K. Hansson and A. Hermansson, “The immune system in atherosclerosis,” Nature Immunology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 204–212, 2011.
- Q. Xu, “Role of heat shock proteins in atherosclerosis,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1547–1559, 2002.
- S. Stemme and G. K. Hansson, “Immune mechanisms in atherosclerosis,” Coronary Artery Disease, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 216–222, 1994.
- O. J. De Boer, A. C. Van der Wal, M. A. Houtkamp, J. M. Ossewaarde, P. Teeling, and A. E. Becker, “Unstable atherosclerotic plaques contain T-cells that respond to Chlamydia pneumoniae,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 402–408, 2000.
- A. K. L. Robertson and G. K. Hansson, “T cells in atherogenesis: for better or for worse?” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 2421–2432, 2006.
- J. Frostegård, A. K. Ulfgren, P. Nyberg et al., “Cytokine expression in advanced human atherosclerotic plaques: dominance of pro-inflammatory (Th1) and macrophage-stimulating cytokines,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 145, no. 1, pp. 33–43, 1999.
- H. Methe, S. Brunner, D. Wiegand, M. Nabauer, J. Koglin, and E. R. Edelman, “Enhanced T-helper-1 lymphocyte activation patterns in acute coronary syndromes,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 1939–1945, 2005.
- D. K. Agrawal and Z. Shao, “Pathogenesis of allergic airway inflammation,” Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 39–48, 2010.
- S. A. Huber, P. Sakkinen, C. David, M. K. Newell, and R. P. Tracy, “T helper-cell phenotype regulates atherosclerosis in mice under conditions of mild hypercholesterolemia,” Circulation, vol. 103, no. 21, pp. 2610–2616, 2001.
- V. L. King, S. J. Szilvassy, and A. Daugherty, “Interleukin-4 deficiency decreases atherosclerotic lesion formation in a site-specific manner in female LDL receptor-/- mice,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 456–461, 2002.
- L. E. Harrington, R. D. Hatton, P. R. Mangan et al., “Interleukin 17-producing CD4+ effector T cells develop via a lineage distinct from the T helper type 1 and 2 lineages,” Nature Immunology, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 1123–1132, 2005.
- H. Park, Z. Li, X. O. Yang et al., “A distinct lineage of CD4 T cells regulates tissue inflammation by producing interleukin 17,” Nature Immunology, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 1133–1141, 2005.
- X. Cheng, X. Yu, Y.-j. Ding et al., “The Th17/Treg imbalance in patients with acute coronary syndrome,” Clinical Immunology, vol. 127, no. 1, pp. 89–97, 2008.
- G. L. Stephens and E. M. Shevach, “Foxp3+ regulatory T cells: selfishness under scrutiny,” Immunity, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 417–419, 2007.
- E. M. Shevach, “Mechanisms of Foxp3+ T regulatory cell-mediated suppression,” Immunity, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 636–645, 2009.
- J. Andersson, P. Libby, and G. K. Hansson, “Adaptive immunity and atherosclerosis,” Clinical Immunology, vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 33–46, 2010.
- C. J. Binder, M. K. Chang, P. X. Shaw et al., “Innate and acquired immunity in atherogenesis,” Nature Medicine, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 1218–1226, 2002.
- C. J. Binder, P. X. Shaw, M.-K. Chang et al., “The role of natural antibodies in atherogenesis,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 1353–1363, 2005.
- G. S. Getz, “Bridging the innate and adaptive immune systems,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 619–622, 2005.
- G. S. Getz, “Thematic review series: the immune system and atherogenesis. Immune function in atherogenesis,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2005.
- G. K. Hansson, “Immune and inflammatory mechanisms in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis,” Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis, vol. 1, supplement, pp. S6–S9, 1994.
- G. K. Hansson, “Immune mechanisms in atherosclerosis,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 1876–1890, 2001.
- G. K. Hansson, “Regulation of immune mechanisms in atherosclerosis,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 947, pp. 157–166, 2001.
- G. K. Hansson, “Atherosclerosis-An immune disease. The Anitschkov Lecture 2007,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 202, no. 1, pp. 2–10, 2009.
- G. K. Hansson, “Inflammatory mechanisms in atherosclerosis,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 7, supplement 1, pp. 328–331, 2009.
- P. Libby, “Inflammation in atherosclerosis,” Nature, vol. 420, no. 6917, pp. 868–874, 2002.
- P. Libby, P. M. Ridker, and G. K. Hansson, “Inflammation in atherosclerosis. From pathophysiology to practice,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 54, no. 23, pp. 2129–2138, 2009.
- G. K. Hansson, A.-K. L. Robertson, and C. Söderberg-Nauclér, “Inflammation and atherosclerosis,” Annual Review of Pathology, vol. 1, pp. 297–329, 2006.
- P. X. Shaw, S. Hörkkö, M. K. Chang et al., “Natural antibodies with the T15 idiotype may act in atherosclerosis, apoptotic clearance, and protective immunity,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 105, no. 12, pp. 1731–1740, 2000.
- W. Palinski and J. L. Witztum, “Immune responses to oxidative neoepitopes on LDL and phospholipids modulate the development of atherosclerosis,” Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 247, no. 3, pp. 371–380, 2000.
- H. Esterbauer, M. Dieber-Rotheneder, G. Waeg, G. Striegl, and G. Jurgens, “Biochemical, structural, and functional properties of oxidized low-density lipoprotein,” Chemical Research in Toxicology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–92, 1990.
- S. Yia-Herttuala, W. Palinski, M. E. Rosenfeld et al., “Evidence for the presence of oxidatively modified low density lipoprotein in atherosclerotic lesions of rabbit and man,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 1086–1095, 1989.
- N. M. Gharavi, J. A. Alva, K. P. Mouillesseaux et al., “Role of the JAK/STAT pathway in the regulation of interleukin-8 transcription by oxidized phospholipids in vitro and in atherosclerosis in vivo,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 43, pp. 31460–31468, 2007.
- E. Svensjö, P. Boschcov, D. F. J. Ketelhuth, S. Jancar, and M. Gidlund, “Increased microvascular permeability in the hamster cheek pouch induced by oxidized low density lipoprotein (oxLDL) and some fragmented apolipoprotein B proteins,” Inflammation Research, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 215–220, 2003.
- D. F. J. Ketelhuth and G. K. Hansson, “Cellular immunity, low-density lipoprotein and atherosclerosis: break of tolerance in the artery wall,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 106, no. 5, pp. 779–786, 2011.
- D. Steinberg, S. Parthasarathy, T. E. Carew, J. C. Khoo, and J. L. Witztum, “Beyond cholesterol: modifications of low-density lipoprotein that increase its atherogenicity,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 320, no. 14, pp. 915–924, 1989.
- G. K. Hansson, “Vaccination against atherosclerosis: acience or fiction?” Circulation, vol. 106, no. 13, pp. 1599–1601, 2002.
- S. Stemme, B. Faber, J. Holm, O. Wiklund, J. L. Witztum, and G. K. Hansson, “T lymphocytes from human atherosclerotic plaques recognize oxidized low density lipoprotein,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 92, no. 9, pp. 3893–3897, 1995.
- S.-I. Toshima, A. Hasegawa, M. Kurabayashi et al., “Circulating oxidized low density lipoprotein levels: a biochemical risk marker for coronary heart disease,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 2243–2247, 2000.
- P. Holvoet, J. Vanhaecke, S. Janssens, F. Van De Werf, and D. Collen, “Oxidized LDL and malondialdehyde-modified LDL in patients with acute coronary syndromes and stable coronary artery disease,” Circulation, vol. 98, no. 15, pp. 1487–1494, 1998.
- H. C. Boyd, A. M. Gown, G. Wolfbauer, and A. Chait, “Direct evidence for a protein recognized by a monoclonal antibody against oxidatively modified LDL in atherosclerotic lesions from a Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbit,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 135, no. 5, pp. 815–825, 1989.
- S. D. Cushing, J. A. Berliner, A. J. Valente et al., “Minimally modified low density lipoprotein induces monocyte chemotactic protein 1 in human endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 87, no. 13, pp. 5134–5138, 1990.
- D. Steinberg, “The LDL modification hypothesis of atherogenesis: an update,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 50, pp. S376–S381, 2009.
- E. A. Dennis and J. L. Witztum, “Fifty years of research on lipids,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 50, supplement, p. S1, 2009.
- N. Baumgarth, J. W. Tung, and L. A. Herzenberg, “Inherent specificities in natural antibodies: a key to immune defense against pathogen invasion,” Springer Seminars in Immunopathology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 347–362, 2005.
- H. Masmoudi, T. Mota-Santos, F. Huetz, A. Coutinho, and P. A. Cazenave, “All T15 Id-positive antibodies (but not the majority of V(H)T15+ antibodies) are produced by peritoneal CD5+ B lymphocytes,” International Immunology, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 515–520, 1990.
- P. Casali, S. E. Burastero, and M. Nakamura, “Human lymphocytes making rheumatoid factor and antibody to ssDNA belong to Leu-1+ B-cell subset,” Science, vol. 236, no. 4797, pp. 77–81, 1987.
- K. Hayakawa, M. Asano, S. A. Shinton et al., “Positive selection of anti-thy-1 autoreactive B-1 cells and natural serum autoantibody production independent from bone marrow B cell development,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 197, no. 1, pp. 87–99, 2003.
- R. Berland and H. H. Wortis, “Origins and functions of B-1 cells with notes on the role of CD5,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 20, pp. 253–300, 2002.
- N. A. Bos, J. J. Cebra, and F. G. M. Kroese, “B-1 cells and the intestinal microflora,” Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 252, pp. 211–220, 2000.
- P. A. Lalor and G. Morahan, “The peritoneal Ly-1 (CD5) B cell repertoire is unique among murine B cell repertoires,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 485–492, 1990.
- L. A. Herzenberg and L. A. Herzenberg, “Toward a layered immune system,” Cell, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 953–954, 1989.
- W. Palinski, S. Hörkkö, E. Miller et al., “Cloning of monoclonal autoantibodies to epitopes of oxidized lipoproteins from apolipoprotein E-deficient mice: demonstration of epitopes of oxidized low density lipoprotein in human plasma,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 800–814, 1996.
- W. Palinski, R. K. Tangirala, E. Miller, S. G. Young, and J. L. Witztum, “Increased autoantibody titers against epitopes of oxidized LDL in LDL receptor-deficient mice with increased atherosclerosis,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1569–1576, 1995.
- J. T. Salonen, S. Ylä-Herttuala, R. Yamamoto et al., “Autoantibody against oxidised LDL and progression of carotid atherosclerosis,” The Lancet, vol. 339, no. 8798, pp. 883–887, 1992.
- W. Palinski, V. A. Ord, A. S. Plump, J. L. Breslow, D. Steinberg, and J. L. Witztum, “ApoE-deficient mice are a model of lipoprotein oxidation in atherogenesis: demonstration of oxidation-specific epitopes in lesions and high titers of autoantibodies to malondialdehyde-lysine in serum,” Arteriosclerosis and Thrombosis, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 605–616, 1994.
- P. Friedman, S. Hörkkö, D. Steinberg, J. L. Witztum, and E. A. Dennis, “Correlation of antiphospholipid antibody recognition with the structure of synthetic oxidized phospholipids. Importance of Schiff base formation and aldol condensation,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 9, pp. 7010–7020, 2002.
- S. Hörkkö, D. A. Bird, E. Miller et al., “Monoclonal autoantibodies specific for oxidized phospholipids or oxidized phospholipid-protein adducts inhibit macrophage uptake of oxidized low-density lipoproteins,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 117–128, 1999.
- C. J. Binder, S. Hörkkö, A. Dewan et al., “Pneumococcal vaccination decreases atherosclerotic lesion formation: molecular mimicry between Streptococcus pneumoniae and oxidized LDL,” Nature Medicine, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 736–743, 2003.
- G. Caligiuri, J. Khallou-Laschet, M. Vandaele et al., “Phosphorylcholine-targeting immunization reduces atherosclerosis,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 540–546, 2007.
- A. Schiopu, B. Frendéus, B. Jansson et al., “Recombinant antibodies to an oxidized low-density lipoprotein epitope induce rapid regression of atherosclerosis in Apobec-1-/-/low-density lipoprotein receptor-/- mice,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 50, no. 24, pp. 2313–2318, 2007.
- J. Hulthe, L. Bokemark, and B. Fagerberg, “Antibodies to oxidized LDL in relation to intima-media thickness in carotid and femoral arteries in 58-year-old subjectively clinically healthy men,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 101–107, 2001.
- J. Karvonen, M. Päivänsalo, Y. A. Kesäniemi, and S. Hörkkö, “Immunoglobulin M type of autoantibodies to oxidized low-density lipoprotein has an inverse relation to carotid artery atherosclerosis,” Circulation, vol. 108, no. 17, pp. 2107–2112, 2003.
- J. R. Faria-Neto, K. Y. Chyu, X. Li et al., “Passive immunization with monoclonal IgM antibodies against phosphorylcholine reduces accelerated vein graft atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-null mice,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 189, no. 1, pp. 83–90, 2006.
- M. Zhang, W. G. Austen, I. Chiu et al., “Identification of a specific self-reactive IgM antibody that initiates intestinal ischemia/reperfusion injury,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 11, pp. 3886–3891, 2004.
- D. Zhao, H. Ogawa, X. Wang et al., “Oxidized low-density lipoprotein and autoimmune antibodies in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome with a history of thrombosis,” American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 116, no. 5, pp. 760–767, 2001.
- S. Ehara, M. Ueda, T. Naruko et al., “Elevated levels of oxidized low density lipoprotein show a positive relationship with the severity of acute coronary syndromes,” Circulation, vol. 103, no. 15, pp. 1955–1960, 2001.
- J. George, Y. Shoenfeld, A. Afek et al., “Enhanced fatty streak formation in C57BL/6J mice by immunization with heat shock protein-65,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 505–510, 1999.
- J. George, D. Harats, B. Gilburd et al., “Immunolocalization of β2-glycoprotein I (apolipoprotein H) to human atherosclerotic plaques: potential implications for lesion progression,” Circulation, vol. 99, no. 17, pp. 2227–2230, 1999.
- C. Bergmark, R. Wu, U. De Faire, A. K. Lefvert, and J. Swedenborg, “Patients with early-onset peripheral vascular disease have increased levels of autoantibodies against oxidized LDL,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 441–445, 1995.
- C. Monaco, F. Crea, G. Niccoli et al., “Autoantibodies against oxidized low density lipoproteins in patients with stable angina, unstable angina or peripheral vascular disease: pathophysiological implications,” European Heart Journal, vol. 22, no. 17, pp. 1572–1577, 2001.
- S. Yla-Herttuala, W. Palinski, S. W. Butler, S. Picard, D. Steinberg, and J. L. Witztum, “Rabbit and human atherosclerotic lesions contain IgG that recognizes epitopes of oxidized LDL,” Arteriosclerosis and Thrombosis, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 32–40, 1994.
- R. Wu, S. Nityanand, L. Berglund, H. Lithell, G. Holm, and A. K. Lefvert, “Antibodies against cardiolipin and oxidatively modified LDL in 50-year- old men predict myocardial infarction,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 3159–3163, 1997.
- M. Puurunen, M. Mänttäri, V. Manninen et al., “Antibody against oxidized low-density lipoprotein predicting myocardial infarction,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 154, no. 22, pp. 2605–2609, 1994.
- J. C. Fang, S. Kinlay, D. Behrendt et al., “Circulating autoantibodies to oxidized LDL correlate with impaired coronary endothelial function after cardiac transplantation,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 2044–2048, 2002.
- B. P. Swets, D. A. J. Brouwer, and J. W. Cohen Tervaert, “Patients with systemic vasculitis have increased levels of autoantibodies against oxidized LDL,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 163–167, 2001.
- R. Wu, Y. Shoenfeld, Y. Sherer et al., “Anti-idiotypes to oxidized LDL antibodies in intravenous immunoglobulin preparations—possible immunomodulation of atherosclerosis,” Autoimmunity, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 91–97, 2003.
- R. Wu, E. Svenungsson, I. Gunnarsson et al., “Antibodies to adult human endothelial cells cross-react with oxidized low-density lipoprotein and β2-glycoprotein I (β2-GPI) in systemic lupus erythematosus,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 561–566, 1999.
- G. N. Fredrikson, B. Hedblad, G. Berglund et al., “Association between IgM against an aldehyde-modified peptide in apolipoprotein B-100 and progression of carotid disease,” Stroke, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 1495–1500, 2007.
- J. Hulthe, J. Wikstrand, A. Lidell, I. Wendelhag, G. K. Hansson, and O. Wiklund, “Antibody titers against oxidized LDL are not elevated in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1203–1211, 1998.
- U. P. Steinbrecher, S. Parthasarathy, and D. S. Leake, “Modification of low density lipoprotein by endothelial cells involves lipid peroxidation and degradation of low density lipoprotein phospholipids,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 81, no. 12 I, pp. 3883–3887, 1984.
- G. Virella, I. Virella, R. B. Leman, M. B. Pryor, and M. F. Lopes-Virella, “Anti-oxidized low-density lipoprotein antibodies in patients with coronary heart disease and normal healthy volunteers,” International Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Research, vol. 23, no. 1-4, pp. 95–101, 1993.
- S. Ameli, A. Hultgårdh-Nilsson, J. Regnström et al., “Effect of immunization with homologous LDL and oxidized LDL on early atherosclerosis in hypercholesterolemic rabbits,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 1074–1079, 1996.
- W. Palinski, E. Miller, and J. L. Witztum, “Immunization of low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor-deficient rabbits with homologous malondialdehyde-modified LDL reduces atherogenesis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 821–825, 1995.
- G. Caligiuri, A. Nicoletti, B. Poirierand, and G. K. Hansson, “Protective immunity against atherosclerosis carried by B cells of hypercholesterolemic mice,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 109, no. 6, pp. 745–753, 2002.
- X. Zhou, G. Caligiuri, A. Hamsten, A. K. Lefvert, and G. K. Hansson, “LDL immunization induces T-cell-dependent antibody formation and protection against atherosclerosis,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 108–114, 2001.
- A. Schiopu, J. Bengtsson, I. Söderberg et al., “Recombinant human antibodies against aldehyde-modified apolipoprotein B-100 peptide sequences inhibit atherosclerosis,” Circulation, vol. 110, no. 14, pp. 2047–2052, 2004.
- D. Nicolo, B. I. Goldman, and M. Monestier, “Reduction of atherosclerosis in low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice by passive administration of antiphospholipid antibody,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 2974–2978, 2003.
- Y. Shoenfeld, R. Wu, L. D. Dearing, and E. Matsuura, “Are anti-oxidized low-density lipoprotein antibodies pathogenic or protective?” Circulation, vol. 110, no. 17, pp. 2552–2558, 2004.
- T. Shoji, Y. Nishizawa, M. Fukumoto et al., “Inverse relationship between circulating oxidized low density lipoprotein (oxLDL) and anti-oxLDL antibody levels in healthy subjects,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 148, no. 1, pp. 171–177, 2000.
- M. Fukumoto, T. Shoji, M. Emoto, T. Kawagishi, Y. Okuno, and Y. Nishizawa, “Antibodies against oxidized LDL and carotid artery intima-media thickness in a healthy population,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 703–707, 2000.
- R. Klingenberg, M. Lebens, A. Hermansson et al., “Intranasal immunization with an apolipoprotein B-100 fusion protein induces antigen-specific regulatory T cells and reduces atherosclerosis,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 946–952, 2010.
- R. Maron, G. Sukhova, A. M. Faria et al., “Mucosal administration of heat shock protein-65 decreases atherosclerosis and inflammation in aortic arch of low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice,” Circulation, vol. 106, no. 13, pp. 1708–1715, 2002.
- J. Nilsson, G. N. Fredrikson, H. Björkbacka, K. Y. Chyu, and P. K. Shah, “Vaccines modulating lipoprotein autoimmunity as a possible future therapy for cardiovascular disease,” Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 266, no. 3, pp. 221–231, 2009.
- G. H. M. Van Puijvelde, A. D. Hauer, P. De Vos et al., “Induction of oral tolerance to oxidized low-density lipoprotein ameliorates atherosclerosis,” Circulation, vol. 114, no. 18, pp. 1968–1976, 2006.
- G. H. M. Van Puijvelde, T. Van Es, E. J. A. Van Wanrooij et al., “Induction of oral tolerance to HSP60 or an HSP60-peptide activates t cell regulation and reduces atherosclerosis,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 2677–2683, 2007.
- Z. Mallat and A. Tedgui, “Immunomodulation to combat atherosclerosis: the potential role of immune regulatory cells,” Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 1387–1393, 2004.
- G. N. Fredrikson, B. Hedblad, G. Berglund et al., “Identification of immune responses against aldehyde-modified peptide sequences in apoB associated with cardiovascular disease,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 872–878, 2003.
- G. N. Fredrikson, M. W. Lindholm, I. Ljungcrantz, I. Söderberg, P. K. Shah, and J. Nilsson, “Autoimmune responses against the apo B-100 LDL receptor-binding site protect against arterial accumulation of lipids in LDL receptor deficient mice,” Autoimmunity, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 122–130, 2007.
- S. Hörkkö, C. J. Binder, P. X. Shaw et al., “Immunological responses to oxidized LDL,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 1771–1779, 2000.
- P. X. Shaw, S. Hörkkö, S. Tsimikas et al., “Human-derived anti-oxidized LDL autoantibody blocks uptake of oxidized LDL by macrophages and localizes to atherosclerotic lesions in vivo,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1333–1339, 2001.
- G. Virella, M. F. Lopes-Virella, C. J. Binder, and J. L. Witztum, “Humoral immunity and atherosclerosis,” Nature Medicine, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 243–245, 2003.
- G. N. Fredrikson, I. Söderberg, M. Lindholm et al., “Inhibition of atherosclerosis in apoE-null mice by immunization with apoB-100 peptide sequences,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 879–884, 2003.
- G. N. Fredrikson, A. Schiopu, G. Berglund, R. Alm, P. K. Shah, and J. Nilsson, “Autoantibody against the amino acid sequence 661-680 in apo B-100 is associated with decreased carotid stenosis and cardiovascular events,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 194, no. 2, pp. e188–e192, 2007.