Review Article
Nedaplatin: A Radiosensitizing Agent for Patients with Cervical Cancer
Table 1
Summery of the literature on nedaplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
| Author (Reference) | Year | Study type | Setting | Stage | Results |
| J. Kodama [19] | 2008 | Phase I | Postoperative RT | Ib-IIb | Weekly 35 mg/m2 of nedaplatin was recommended. | Y. Kobayashi [21] | 2009 | Retro | Postoperative RT | Ib2-IIb | Biweekly 70 mg/m2 of nedaplatin was employed. CCRT was better than RT alone, but the improvement was not significant. | S. Mabuchi [20] | 2009 | Retro | Postoperative RT | IA2-IIb | Weekly 40 mg/m2 of nedaplatin was employed. CCRT was significantly better than RT alone. |
| Y. Onishi [14] | 2002 | Phase I | Definitive RT | III-IVa | Weekly 30 mg/m2 of nedaplatin was recommended. | K. Yoshinaga [15] | 2007 | Phase I | Definitive RT | Ib2-IIIb | Weekly 35 mg/m2 of nedaplatin was recommended. | Y. Yokoyama [16] | 2008 | Phase II | Definitive RT | Ib2-IVa | Weekly 30 mg/m2 of nedaplatin was employed. | Y. Niibe [17] | 2008 | Phase II | Definitive RT | IIIa-IVa | Weekly 30 mg/m2 of nedaplatin was employed. | S. Mabuchi [18] | 2010 | Retro | Definitive RT | IIIb | Weekly 35mg/m2 of nedaplatin was employed. CCRT was significantly better than RT alone. |
|
|
CCRT: concurrent chemoradiotherapy, Retro: retrospective cohort study, RT: radiotherapy.
|