About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
Volume 2007 (2007), Article ID 51363, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2007/51363
Research Article

A Concept for Extending the Applicability of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy through Motor Cortex Activity Feedback Using a Neural Prosthesis

1Department of Electronic Engineering, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, County Kildare, Ireland
2Department of Computer Science and Department of Experimental Physics, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, County Kildare, Ireland
3Hamilton Institute, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, County Kildare, Ireland
4Department of Computer Science, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, County Kildare, Ireland

Received 17 February 2007; Revised 11 May 2007; Accepted 14 July 2007

Academic Editor: Fabio Babiloni

Copyright © 2007 Tomas E. Ward et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. Adams, M. Victor, and A. Ropper, Adam's & Victor's Principles of Neurology, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 6th edition, 1997.
  2. World Health Organization Global Report 2002, “World Health Organization,” January 2007, http://www.who.int/whr/2002/en/index.html.
  3. The Internet Stroke Centre, January 2007, http://www.strokecenter.org/pat/stats.htm.
  4. R. W. Bohannon, “Muscle strength and muscle training after stroke,” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 14–20, 2007.
  5. E. Taub, N. E. Miller, and T. A. Novack, et al., “Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 347–354, 1993.
  6. E. Taub, G. Uswatte, and R. Pidikiti, “Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation—a clinical review,” Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 237–251, 1999.
  7. W. H. Miltner, H. Bauder, M. Sommer, C. Dettmers, and E. Taub, “Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: a replication,” Stroke, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 586–592, 1999.
  8. J. Liepert, “Motor cortex excitability in stroke before and after constraint-induced movement therapy,” Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 41–47, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. V. W. Mark, E. Taub, and D. M. Morris, “Neuroplasticity and constraint-induced movement therapy,” Europa Medicophysica, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 269–284, 2006.
  10. S. L. Wolf, C. J. Winstein, and J. P. Miller, et al., “Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 296, no. 17, pp. 2095–2104, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  11. V. W. Mark and E. Taub, “Constraint-induced movement therapy for chronic stroke hemiparesis and other disabilities,” Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, vol. 22, no. 3-4, pp. 317–336, 2004.
  12. P. S. Lum, C. G. Burgar, D. E. Kenney, and H. F. M. Van der Loos, “Quantification of force abnormalities during passive and active-assisted upper-limb reaching movements in post-stroke hemiparesis,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 652–662, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. J. H. van der Lee, R. C. Wagenaar, G. J. Lankhorst, T. W. Vogelaar, W. L. Devillé, and L. M. Bouter, “Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial,” Stroke, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 2369–2375, 1999.
  14. J. Chae, F. Bethoux, T. Bohinc, L. Dobos, T. Davis, and A. Friedl, “Neuromuscular stimulation for upper extremity motor and functional recovery in acute hemiplegia,” Stroke, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 975–979, 1998.
  15. J. Powell, A. D. Pandyan, M. Granat, M. Cameron, and D. J. Stott, “Electrical stimulation of wrist extensors in poststroke hemiplegia,” Stroke, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 1384–1389, 1999.
  16. A. J. Butler and S. J. Page, “Mental practice with motor imagery: evidence for motor recovery and cortical reorganization after stroke,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 87, no. 12, supplement, pp. 2–11, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  17. S. Coyle, T. E. Ward, C. Markham, and G. McDarby, “On the suitability of near-infrared (NIR) systems for next-generation brain-computer interfaces,” Physiological Measurement, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 815–822, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. R. Sitaram, H. Zhang, and C. Guan, et al., “Temporal classification of multichannel near-infrared spectroscopy signals of motor imagery for developing a brain-computer interface,” NeuroImage, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1416–1427, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  19. S. Coyle, T. E. Ward, and C. Markham, “An optical brain computer interface,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Brain-Computer Interface Workshop and Training Course, vol. 49 of Biomedizinische Technik, pp. 45–46, Graz, Austria, 2004.
  20. J. W. Krakauer, “Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation,” Current Opinion in Neurology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 84–90, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. E. Taub and G. Uswatte, “Constraint-induced movement therapy: answers and questions after two decades of research,” NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 93–95, 2006.
  22. H. I. Krebs, N. Hogan, M. L. Aisen, and B. T. Volpe, “Robot-aided neuro-rehabilitation,” IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 75–87, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. E. J. Plautz, G. W. Milliken, and R. J. Nudo, “Effects of repetitive motor training on movement representations in adult squirrel monkeys: role of use versus learning,” Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 27–55, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  24. J. H. van der Lee, R. C. Wagenaar, G. J. Lankhorst, T. W. Vogelaar, W. L. Devillé, and L. M. Bouter, “Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial,” Stroke, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 2369–2375, 1999.
  25. B. T. Volpe, H. I. Krebs, N. Hogan, L. Edelsteinn, C. M. Diels, and M. L. Aisen, “Robot training enhanced motor outcome in patients with stroke maintained over 3 years,” Neurology, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 1874–1876, 1999.
  26. M. Ferraro, J. J. Palazzolo, J. Krol, H. I. Krebs, N. Hogan, and B. T. Volpe, “Robot-aided sensorimotor arm training improves outcome in patients with chronic stroke,” Neurology, vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 1604–1607, 2003.
  27. R. Colombo, F. Pisano, and S. Micera, et al., “Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 311–324, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  28. B. T. Volpe, M. Ferraro, and D. Lynch, et al., “Robotics and other devices in the treatment of patients recovering from stroke,” Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 465–470, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. M. J. Johnson, “Recent trends in robot-assisted therapy environments to improve real-life functional performance after stroke,” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 29, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  30. L. Dipietro, M. Ferraro, J. J. Palazzolo, H. I. Krebs, B. T. Volpe, and N. Hogan, “Customized interactive robotic treatment for stroke: EMG-triggered therapy,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 325–334, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  31. A. Kübler, V. K. Mushahwar, L. R. Hochberg, and J. P. Donoghue, “BCI meeting 2005-workshop on clinical issues and applications,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 131–134, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. B. H. Dobkin, “Brain-computer interface technology as a tool to augment plasticity and outcomes for neurological rehabilitation,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 579, no. 3, pp. 637–642, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  33. G. Pfurtscheller, G. R. Müller, J. Pfurtscheller, H. J. Gerner, and R. Rupp, “‘Thought’—control of functional electrical stimulation to restore hand grasp in a patient with tetraplegia,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 351, no. 1, pp. 33–36, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. A. Buttfield, P. W. Ferrez, and J. D. R. Millán, “Towards a robust BCI: error potentials and online learning,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 164–168, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  35. Y. Wang, R. Wang, X. Gao, B. Hong, and S. Gao, “A practical VEP-based brain-computer interface,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 234–240, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  36. D. J. McFarland, D. J. Krusienski, and J. R. Wolpaw, “Brain-computer interface signal processing at the Wadsworth Center: mu and sensorimotor beta rhythms,” Progress in Brain Research, vol. 159, pp. 411–419, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  37. E. W. Sellers, D. J. Krusienski, D. J. McFarland, T. M. Vaughan, and J. R. Wolpaw, “A P300 event-related potential brain-computer interface (BCI): the effects of matrix size and inter stimulus interval on performance,” Biological Psychology, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 242–252, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  38. C. Vidaurre, A. Schlögl, R. Cabeza, R. Scherer, and G. Pfurtscheller, “A fully on-line adaptive BCI,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1214–1219, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  39. N. Birbaumer and L. G. Cohen, “Brain-computer interfaces: communication and restoration of movement in paralysis,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 579, no. 3, pp. 621–636, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  40. F. Hummel, P. Celnik, and P. Giraux, et al., “Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke,” Brain, vol. 128, no. 3, pp. 490–499, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  41. P. Rolfe, “In vivo near-infrared spectroscopy,” Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 2, pp. 715–754, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  42. S. Coyle, Near-infrared spectroscopy for brain computer interfacing, Ph.D. thesis, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Ireland, 2005.
  43. M. Cope and D. T. Delpy, “System for long-term measurement of cerebral blood and tissue oxygenation on newborn infants by near infra-red transillumination,” Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 289–294, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. R. C. Oldfield, “The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 97–113, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. S. Coyle, C. Markham, W. Lanigan, and T. Ward, “A mechanical mounting system for functional near-infrared spectroscopy brain imaging studies,” in Opto-Ireland 2005: Optical Sensing and Spectroscopy, vol. 5826 of Proceedings of SPIE, pp. 618–627, Dublin, Ireland, April 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. HomER, http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/PMI/resources/homer/home.htm.
  47. F. Babiloni, D. Mattia, and C. Babiloni, et al., “Multimodal integration of EEG, MEG and fMRI data for the solution of the neuroimage puzzle,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1471–1476, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed